similar to: Samba and CTDB on GlusterFS

HI: Was there a limit of servers which was used as storage in Gluster ? 2009-06-24 eagleeyes ???? gluster-users-request ????? 2009-06-24 03:00:42 ???? gluster-users ??? ??? Gluster-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 34 Send Gluster-users mailing list submissions to gluster-users at gluster.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hi, I am having some problem with new version of GlusterFS-2.0.1 while copying using "apache" user. sudo -u apache cp -pvf zip/* test/ getting the message cp: getting attribute `trusted.glusterfs.afr.data-pending' of `zip/speccok1ma131231824637.zip': Operation not permitted `zip/speccok1ma131231824776.zip' -> `test/speccok1ma131231824776.zip' No problem while

Hi, I'd like to set up a HA Samba server that serves out data from NFS mounts​. I was thinking that CTDB was the thing to do use but it is only mentioned with serving clustered file systems like Gluster, Lustre, etc. Is there a way to set up a HA Samba server without a clustered file system? ​Thanks, Steve​

elbert at host1:~$ dpkg -l|grep glusterfs ii glusterfs-client 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse client ii glusterfs-server 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse server ii libglusterfs0 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS libraries and translator modules I have 2 hosts set up to use AFR with

Hi. I'm evaluating GlusterFS for our DFS implementation, and wondered how it compares to KFS/CloudStore? These features here look especially nice ( http://kosmosfs.sourceforge.net/features.html). Any idea what of them exist in GlusterFS as well? Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Does the stable version of GlusterFS, GlusterFS 1.3-SUSKE RELEASE, have the High Availably (HA) Translator or is it just in v1.4? John This email was independently scanned for viruses by McAfee anti-virus software and none were found

Hello, I try to set up a clustered samba server (on Novell SLES11SP2) based upon CTDB and NFS. My problem is that I do not yet understand the structure of the setup when using NFS. I followed the documentation in http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/CTDB_Setup#Setting_up_CTDB_for_clustered_NFS As far as I understand this documentation, it should be possible to set up a samba cluster say having 3

On 03/11/16 14:28, Ralph Böhme wrote: > >> Ah, my smb.conf is missing the "ctdb socket" parameter. According to "man >> smb.conf" this should be set, but I don't remember seeing it on the wiki >> pages. > if it's not set, the default is used which works in many cases, but > not in mine. If the default wasn't working in your setup,

Hi folks, I know this topic was already discussed but unfortunately non of the suggestion's helped. My current setup, Glusterfs on ZFS, CTDB installed but running into "Permission denied" error in regards to the lock file. What did I tried/tested: - Mounting the gluster volume with option --direct-io-mode=enable - ping_pong -rw /gluster/lock/lock 3

HI: Was there a limit of servers which was used as storage in Gluster ? 2009-06-24 eagleeyes ???? gluster-users-request ????? 2009-06-24 03:00:42 ???? gluster-users ??? ??? Gluster-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 34 Send Gluster-users mailing list submissions to gluster-users at gluster.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hi - I already have an NFS server in production which shares Web data for a 4-node Apache cluster. I'd like to switch to GlusterFS. Do I have to copy the files from the NFS storage to a GlusterFS one, or may it work if I just install GlusterFS on that server, configuring a GFS volume to the existing storage directory (assuming, of course, the NFS server is shuuted down and not used

Could I impose upon someone to provide some guidance? Some hint? Thank you Is a shared file system actually required? If etcd is used to manage the global recovery lock, is there any need at that point for a shared file system? In other words, are there samba or CTDB files (state) that must be on a shared file system, or can each clustered host simply have these files locally? What must be

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:13:53 +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:34:21PM +1100, Martin Schwenke via samba wrote: > > If you lock the file from a client attached to 1 node and > > "smbstatus -L" shows the lock from all the nodes then CTDB is doing > > what it is meant to. That is, it makes sure that Samba

Hi list We recently upgraded our fileservers from Centos supplied 4.2.10 to Sernet 4.4.6, and then our DCs from 3.6.x to 4.4.6. It seems that since then we've had problems with locks not being obeyed on all nodes - they only seem to work when a second client opens a file on the same node as the first client. For example, when a user opens an Excel file I will see something like this

Hi all, Is it possible to use a nfs share to serve as a glusterfs server process?? For example: I have a host that mounts a nfs share from a solaris server under /mnt. Can I use this /mnt directory for a glusterfs server?? Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

I was testing ocfs2 on a 2 node cluster set up. ocfs2-tools version is 1.6.3 ocfs2 kernel version is 2.6.36 Using cman on 2 nodes node02 dw # ping_pong -rwm /data/test.dat 3 data increment = 2 14 locks/sec node01 dw # ping_pong -rw /data/test.dat 3 data increment = 2 10 locks/sec node02 dw # ping_pong -r /data/test.dat 3 1980 locks/sec Using cman on 1 node node02 dw #

On 03/11/16 13:12, Ralph Böhme wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> Can you send your smb.conf so I can compare it to mine? > sure. It's a virtual cluster in LXC containers with 3 nodes, > filesystem is a bind mount with ext4. > > # cat /var/lib/lxc/ctdb-node0/rootfs/opt/samba/etc/smb.conf > [global] > clustering = yes > ctdbd socket =

On 05/07/16 19:45, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: >> I've set up the "DR" side of my cluster to "use mmap = no" and with >> "private dir" removed from the smb.conf. > Why do you set "use mmap = no"? > >> I have the MooseFS guys on the case as well. Should I put them in touch

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > At the moment we're pretty happy with the Samba side of things. I > did wonder if there was any help that you kind chaps might be able > to give to the MooseFS guys if they need it (they've not asked yet > but I've suggested they might be able to). Overall it's working The main hint I would like to give to

Fwd'ing this since it seems my reply and your response didn't actually go to the mailing list. -----Original Message----- From: Keith Freedman [mailto:freedman at FreeFormIT.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:02 PM To: Will Rouesnel Subject: RE: [Gluster-users] Why does glusterfs not automatically fix these kinds of problems? At 08:47 PM 10/1/2008, you wrote: >Unison operates on