similar to: Compiling fuse-2.7.3glfs10 - Error

?Hi, I have the next scenario: ############################################################################# SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture) ?############################################################################# Two Storage Machines with: HARDWARE DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache, Bus 1333FSB RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb) 8 HDD 1 TB,

Hi, I am the next scenario: ############################################################################# SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture) ?############################################################################# Two Storage Machines with: HARDWARE DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache, Bus 1333FSB RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb) 8 HDD 1 TB, Near Line SAS 3,5"

Hi, I have a machine that must to reexport glusterfs to nfs. CONFIGURATION 2 glusterfs servers | ?| ? | 1 gluterfs client 1 nfs server ?| ?| ?| 1 nfs client #*********************************************** # GLUSTERFS SERVER ?#*********************************************** # Export with glusterfs $ glusterfs -f /etc/glusterfs/glusterfs-server.vol $ cat

Hi, I need to make a quota mechanism to restrict glusterfs space to users. How I proceed? I have an AFR installation with two servers and one NFS reexporter machine working. -- Martin Gumbau - mgumbau at iciq.es Responsable Informatic dels grups teorics de Quimica Computacional del ICIQ

Hello all, I am attempting to compile Gluster 1.3.10 on a newly-installed Fedora Core 9 machine, without success. The only non-stock package on the otherwise vanilla system is the Gluster version of Fuse. ----------------------- # rpm -qa | grep fuse fuse-devel-2.7.3glfs10-1.i386 fuse-2.7.3glfs10-1.i386 fuse-libs-2.7.3glfs10-1.i386 # rpmbuild -ta glusterfs-1.3.10.tar.gz (..snip..) make[5]:

Hello everyone, I am learning and evaluating a glusterfs for film/video editing facilities. Some major film/video editing realtime applications are using the O_DIRECT file access for video/audio data files. The GLFS client via fuse mechanism is disallow the open file with O_DIRECT flag. I made a little sample code for read a file with O_DIRECT flag, and tried open the files on GLFS volumes. It

We at Wiseguys are looking into GlusterFS to run our Internet Archive. The archive stores webpages collected by our spiders. The test setup consists of three data machines, each exporting a volume of about 3.7TB and one nameserver machine. File layout is such that each host has it's own directory, for example the GlusterFS website would be located in:

Hi. I'm using GlusterFS v1.3.12 (glusterfs-1.3.12.tar.gz) via FUSE (fuse-2.7.3glfs10.tar.gz) on CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (Linux kernel 2.6.18-92.el5) now. The nodes are HP Proliant DL360 G5 (as GlusterFS Client) and DL180 G5 (as GlusterFS Servers). And the connections are all TCP/IP on Gigabit ethernet. Then, I tested self-heal and I found a technical problem about "replace" -- self-heal

I have a very simple test setup of 2 servers each working as a glusterfs-server and glusterfs-client to the other in an afr capacity. The gluster-c and gluster-s both start up with no errors and are handshaking properly.. One one server, I get the expected behaviour: I touch a file in the export dir and it magically appears in the others mount point. On the other server however, the file

Just make gcc happy when fuse is not available. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- src/fuse.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/fuse.c b/src/fuse.c index 2bd6787..349a5b9 100644 --- a/src/fuse.c +++ b/src/fuse.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/wait.h> +#if HAVE_FUSE /* See

--- fuse/test-fuse.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fuse/test-fuse.c b/fuse/test-fuse.c index 2876dc4..1e18a75 100644 --- a/fuse/test-fuse.c +++ b/fuse/test-fuse.c @@ -249,9 +249,7 @@ test_fuse (void) unsigned u, u1; int fd; struct timeval tv[2]; -#if 0 struct timespec ts[2]; -#endif acl_t acl; char *acl_text; @@ -574,8 +572,6 @@ test_fuse (void)

I don't believe this has any use or meaning. Currently the tools don't process -?, eg: $ guestfish -\? Try `guestfish --help' for more information. Therefore I believe this is erroneous. --- fish/fish.c | 2 +- fuse/guestmount.c | 2 +- fuse/guestunmount.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fish/fish.c b/fish/fish.c index

Exit with 3 as return value when fusermount fails, because the specified mount point is not considered mounted for the user. This is in line with what the guestunmount documentation says. Adapt the test-guestunmount-fd test to the updated return value. Thanks to: Maxim Perevedentsev. --- fuse/guestunmount.c | 2 +- fuse/test-guestunmount-fd.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5

I get the following error when I try installing fuse-ntfs-3g even though I have installed fuse-2.7 and fuse-kmdl-2.7 error: Failed dependencies: libfuse.so.2 is needed by fuse-ntfs-3g-1.913-1.el5.rf.i386 libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.2) is needed by fuse-ntfs-3g-1.913-1.el5.rf.i386 libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5) is needed by fuse-ntfs-3g-1.913-1.el5.rf.i386 libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.6) is

Folks My experiments with installing ZFS-FUSE in a Centos 6 system reveal behavior different from that observed in Centos 5.6. The version of ZFS-FUSE is that provided on the EPEL repository, and was installed on a 32-bit machine. I use it because of its deduplication facility. In Centos 5.6, the facility worked as advertised. In Centos 6, however, the system "hung" in

Previously if you were root, and you tried to change directory into a directory which was not owned by you and not readable (eg. 0700 bin:bin), it would fail. This doesn't fail on regular directories because when you are root the kernel just ignores permissions. Although libguestfs in general tries not to duplicate kernel code, in the case where we emulate the FUSE access(2) system call,

Fix compilation failure on F17 --- fuse/guestmount.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fuse/guestmount.c b/fuse/guestmount.c index 7c5e0af..379346f 100644 --- a/fuse/guestmount.c +++ b/fuse/guestmount.c @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <getopt.h> #include <signal.h> +#include <locale.h> /* We're still using some of FUSE to

On Tuesday 04 February 2014 09:54:58 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:14:09PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:29:37PM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: > > > Ahhh, understood. I do have have an image I can provide that was > > > installed onto and MBR layout (seemed the easiest for libguestfs > > > to > > >

Upon seeing RWM Jones article "Using mount-local API from C" I became curious because I thought there WAS a way to combine aspects of FUSE with the tools provided by libguestfs. So if I wanted to create my own filesystem using callbacks placed in the 'fuse_operations' struct (parameter to 'fuse_main()'), I could do so using guestfs. But after reading the article and

Hello, I noticed FUSE is not there by default disabled on centos 5. Is there a separate RPM that includes FUSE module for the same kernel as of centos 5 ?. I have installed the latest centos 5 update, don't see FUSE enabled . [root at xx]# pwd /lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.8.el5/source [root at xx]# grep FUSE .config # CONFIG_FUSE_FS is not set [root at xx]# I checked both addons and