similar to: Samba 3.0.21a Available for Download

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 =============================================================== You can't change the world, but you can make a dent. -- Smoochy the Rhino =============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Exposed clear text of domain machine == account password in debug logs (log == level >= 5) == CVE ID#: CAN_2006-1059 == == Versions: Samba Samba 3.0.21 - 3.0.21c (inclusive) == == Summary: The winbindd daemon writes the clear text ==

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Exposed clear text of domain machine == account password in debug logs (log == level >= 5) == CVE ID#: CAN_2006-1059 == == Versions: Samba Samba 3.0.21 - 3.0.21c (inclusive) == == Summary: The winbindd daemon writes the clear text ==

Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal at eyal.emu.id.au> writes: > I am upgrading to f42. > > I get this failure doing "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42" > > 2025-05-17T21:13:37+1000 CRITICAL Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/bin/rhino conflicts between attempted installs of rhino-1.7.14-14.fc42.noarch and nut-2.8.3-1.fc42.x86_64 > > Both packages

I would like to have your comments regarding: 1) drivers/rhino.c ------------------ The following patch addresses some problems in drivers/rhino.c. Or that is what I think. I don't use this hardware. The patch: 1. Eliminates some usefulness definitions. 2. It removes code that evaluate the time. I can't see how the code actually does useful work. 3. The

I'm running the samba-client-3.0.20-0.1 SUSE RPM. I was using the version that came with 9.3 but upgraded to see if this specific problem would go away. Guest access does not appear to be working correctly, and it looks like the problem is due to guest not getting mapped into the LDAP query correctly. Specifically, I can login with local account, join workstation to the domain, browse

On 18/5/25 22:07, Greg Troxel wrote: > Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal at eyal.emu.id.au> writes: > >> I am upgrading to f42. >> >> I get this failure doing "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42" >> >> 2025-05-17T21:13:37+1000 CRITICAL Error: Transaction test error: >> file /usr/bin/rhino conflicts between attempted installs of

Had a fairly horrible lightning storm night before last, and four of eight ports in a 1.4.20 machine stopped answering. In the CLI: budsw*CLI> zap show channels Chan Extension Context Language MOH Interpret pseudo default en default 1 from-zaptel en default 2 from-zaptel en default

The if() statement always evaluated to true. Detected by "cppcheck", not tested on real hardware. Signed-off-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch at intra2net.com> --- drivers/rhino.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rhino.c b/drivers/rhino.c index ca66169..e478bcb 100644 --- a/drivers/rhino.c +++ b/drivers/rhino.c @@ -187,7 +187,7

I would really appreciate help ! I did not have any reply to my two posts and I don't know what to do. I can't build 3.0.21a and I have to migrate 54 Solaris 2.5.1 servers from 2.2.8a to 3.0.x. I'm afraid we could not move to newer solaris versions before 12 or 18 months. Under is the problem description. Thank you for your help. Pierre --------- SOLARIS 7 --------- On Solaris 7

Hello, My first attempt to get dahdi running on 1.4.28... with a Rhino 8 port modular card and a single FXS module. Got the Rhino card installed and the machine sees it: root at pbx:/etc/dahdi# dmesg | grep rcbfx [ 71.985309] rcbfx 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 21 [ 71.985440] rcbfx 1: Rhino PCI BAR0 50100000 IOMem mapped at ffffc90008d7c000 [ 71.985504]

FYI Arnaud ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Silvino Benevides Magalhaes <sbm2yk at gmail.com> Date: 2009/10/14 Subject: Re: about solis and rhino To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com> Hi Arnaud, I was on holiday, so I only answer you now. About rhino, I received a document contains the its protocol and a little box with rhino firmware to testing driver

I am upgrading to f42. I get this failure doing "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42" 2025-05-17T21:13:37+1000 CRITICAL Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/bin/rhino conflicts between attempted installs of rhino-1.7.14-14.fc42.noarch and nut-2.8.3-1.fc42.x86_64 Both packages contain a file with the same name. Is this problem being dealt with? What is the recommended

Hello, The company I work for recently purchased 2 Rhino CB24s and a Rhino PCI-E R4T1. The channel banks are plugged into the R4T1, as well as 2 PRIs from our telco. The CB24s are for all internal analog phones. Most of the phones are setup in "batphone mode", which is "immediate=on" in the DAHDI config. They are set up this way because we are an outgoing call

I'm hoping someone can give me a little dialplan assistance. Here is my scenario... I currently have an AT&T T1 connected to a Nortel Optn 11. I recently purchased a Rhino system with a Rhino dual T1 card. What I want to do is insert the Rhino box between the CO and the Nortel on the T1 so I can start migrating users over to the Asterisk system in the near future. But, in the meantime, I

Peter, looking back on rev 543, it looks like my 'make depend' ended up removing 'rhino.h', but also removed the rule for rhino.o as well. Did I miss a step somewhere? On 10/9/06, Peter Selinger <selinger-guest@costa.debian.org> wrote: > - updated dependencies for rhino -- - Charles Lepple

Hi Folks, Struggling with a new * installation with 2 Rhino R2T1 cards. For some reason, the system is locking up tight when you run ztcfg to configure the card(s). Configuration is asterisk 1.2.14, zaptel 1.2.12, and rhino's 1.05rxt1 drivers. The cards seem to load fine with a "modprobe rxt1", but once you run "ztcfg -vvv", the system will lock up within a few seconds, no

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== A revolution without dancing... is a revolution not worth having! -- V ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is

Hi all, I am a huge fan of Sangoma cards after having many problems with digium cards and then switching to sangoma cards and them giving me excellent support with excellent results. That being said, they are also alot more money than the Rhino cards and my friend currently has 1 digium 4 fxo card in their system and they need to add another phone line, plus they have echo problems and quality

i have quite some problems getting 2 lans together with tinc, setup is : 2 linuxrouter connected to the inet. behind everyone is a subnet 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 with some normal windowsworkstations. these 2 subnets should be merged to one. we already connected the 2 linuxboxes with tinc and it worked smooth. but the subnets behind the routers werent pingable. so I thought we need ethernet