Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Samba 3.0.23 Available for Download"
2006 Jul 10
4
Samba 3.0.23 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
You are standing in an open field west
of a white house, with a board front door.
There is a small mailbox here.
==============================================================
Release Announcements
2007 Jan 24
2
Samba v3.0.23a BROKE my network
I run Samba as a PDC for a small network. I used to use smbpassword and
went through the pain of changing up to tdbsam.
I have just upgraded from v3.0.14a to v3.0.23a.
The immediate effect was that nobody could use their domain log in any
more.
I was upset. My users wished me to understand their frustration. It
was not my fault. I became cross. The dog got my dinner (it's an ill
2006 Apr 23
0
Samba 3.0.23pre1 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
A revolution without dancing...
is a revolution not worth having!
-- V
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is
2006 Apr 23
2
Samba 3.0.23pre1 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
A revolution without dancing...
is a revolution not worth having!
-- V
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is
2009 Aug 03
1
TOSHAG-ChangeNotes.xml translate finished and some typo found
Now, TOSHARG-ChangeNotes.xml translate to Japanese finished(3.4.0 base).
And some typo found.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assume that a group named <emphasis>developers</emphasis> exists with a UNIX GID of 782. In this
case this user does not exist in Samba's group mapping table. It would be perfectly normal for
----group?
2006 Jun 23
0
Samba 3.0.23rc3 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
> How do you set 'hide unreadable = yes' via the standard
> RPC calls? We need more than pure Win32 allows.
RegSetValue() :-)
-- samba-technical ml
-- Samba Management Thread
2006 Jun 23
0
Samba 3.0.23rc3 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
> How do you set 'hide unreadable = yes' via the standard
> RPC calls? We need more than pure Win32 allows.
RegSetValue() :-)
-- samba-technical ml
-- Samba Management Thread
2007 Dec 31
0
[problem for] compile Samba + Mysql (pdbsql)
Hi everybody !
First, sorry for my bad english...
I try to compile my samba with mysql backend but i have a problem with
the compil of pdbsql (on a Debian ETCH installation)
Let's see what i did :
(The Bold lignes are the return error message that i have)
Thanks for you help...
1? installer outils de compilation et de subversion :
- aptitude install dpkg-dev
- aptitude install
2006 Jul 12
1
Setting ACLs fail
Hi,
when I try to Left-Click-Properties on any file or directory on my
samba-server (named fileserver, my PDC) and select the "security"-tab, all
acls are listed as before the upgrade from 3.0.21b to 3.0.23, but when I
click on "Add" I get the following error:
'The program cannot open the required dialog box
because it because it cannot determine whether the compter
2006 Jul 20
1
3.0.23 for Debian Sarge: LDAP problems
Hi,
I always prefer the Samba packages for Debian-Stable from the
Samba-Team and I never had a problem so far (thank you, Simo!).
Yesterday I updated from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23 in my LDAP-based network. I
updated samba.schema, added "index sambaSID eq,sub" to my slapd.conf
and ran slapindex. When I started slapd and samba afterwards, I saw
error messages like these (from smbd.log):
2011 Jan 24
1
Upgrading from 3.0.23 but group_mapping.tdb is empty on current config
Hi all,
I've done a serious amount of reading around this but I still can't figure out the implications of what I'm seeing.
I have inherited a CentOS 4 Samba 3.0.23 PDC & file server for 40 hosts that has been through the wars. It is standalone and stable and uses the smbpasswd file authentication backend, however I need to upgrade for Windows 7 support.
I intend to build a
2006 Sep 01
0
Samba 3.0.23c Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
"I think we just hit thread level Orange."
-- anonymous
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is
2004 Aug 16
0
Slow logins and groupmaps, Please Help
I have my samba box running as a PDC. When users
login to the domain, it takes a long time (3-5
minutes). I gets to the section 'Loading Personel
Settings...' and just sits there for several minutes.
I've also noticed that the login.bat script only works
for root, and all that does is net use h:
\\samba\homes. Here's my smb.conf file. Any help
would be appreciated.
[global]
2009 Nov 20
1
Builtin group mapping problem with latest from git
Hi,
I'm trying to run the latest samba from git for the first time in order
to finalize a patch to submit for a bug that I've been working on. I'm
running Fedora 11 and everything is tested and working on that with
samba 3.4.2. I got the latest version from git (3.6.0) ran configure and
make OK, and installed it. The built smbd and winbindd run fine, but
trying to access the machine
2006 Jun 13
0
Samba 3.0.23rc2 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
It was during the jra vs. vl code reformatting wars.
Somewhere around the time of the 80 column massacre.
-- coffeedude
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is
2006 Jul 18
0
[Fwd: Re: USRMGR.exe not working properly]
i built a samba/ldap pdc.
i have the same 'net groupmap list' as holger wesser.
it was made by a 'net rpc vampire' because i have to migrate from an NT4
domain. so if i understand well, 'net rpc vampire' creates unix groups
with blank spaces but shouldnt ?
unix groups are at the right of the groupmap list ? exact ?
Do i have to correct unix groups in the ldap base and put
2006 Jul 17
0
[Fwd: Re: USRMGR.exe not working properly]
i have a samba/ldap pdc with smbldap-tools and i have the same 'net
groupmap list' as holger wesser's machine.
the groups were created by smbldap-populate, i didnt do it myself, so i
think it's fairly normal. could anybody confirm ?
regards
samba 3.0.22
openldap 2.2.23
smbldap-tools 0.8.7
-------- Message original --------
Sujet: Re: USRMGR.exe not working properly
Date: Mon,
2006 Jul 19
2
Security = ADS and 3.0.23 Upgrade
Since upgrading to 3.0.23 I have encountered several problems. (latest
Debian Sarge with deb's from samba.org and security = ADS). All was
working flawlessly before.
*1.* getent passwd no longer lists machine accounts.
*2.* On the Win2K pdc, the samba system's "DNS name" on the general tab
is now listed as localhost.localdomain, and the operating system is
still listed as
2007 Jun 14
0
Samba with pdbsql (postgres) as backend - Machines can't join/login domain
Hey guys,
I'm trying to setup a centralized network authentication with postgresql
and I already have almost the services authenticating via postgresql.
Right now I'm trying to setup samba to also authenticate my users
against postgres database and I can successfully authenticate a user on
a windows desktop to lookup a share by example, but I can't do login on
the domain or even join
2007 Mar 04
0
Samba PDC (3.0.24)
Hi All,
I've been reading *lots* of pages and guides everywhere about setting up
samba as a PDC, mainly the 8 part guide by John Terpstra.
One common thing I found in all the guides I read were unstated
dependancies on the Samba version.
Tried it using 3.0.9 and it didn't have any rights (I found something
somewhere saying this eventually).
Then tried it using Debians default of