similar to: Samba 3.0.25 Available for Download

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== I'm thinking with sand here! -- JFK in "Bubba Ho-Tep" ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the first production release of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== Port 80 is the new HTTP. -- Jeremy Allison on Web Services ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of the Samba 3.0.25

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== Port 80 is the new HTTP. -- Jeremy Allison on Web Services ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of the Samba 3.0.25

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== He has the most amazing ability to focus on the most mind-numbingly boring tasks. -- mbp speaking about tpot ============================================================== Release Announcements

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== I'm not really concerned with performance. -- SambaXP 07 Attendee referring to LDAP Directories ============================================================== Release Announcements

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== He has the most amazing ability to focus on the most mind-numbingly boring tasks. -- mbp speaking about tpot ============================================================== Release Announcements

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== I'm not really concerned with performance. -- SambaXP 07 Attendee referring to LDAP Directories ============================================================== Release Announcements

Hi Jeremy, thank you for your very helpful response. We're looking at a few more options. Would you have the time to provide some guidance on these, how helpful they may be? - *aio ** -> https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html#AIOREADSIZE - *write cache* -> https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html#WRITECACHESIZE -

Hi We are facing an issue with Samba3.0.25b. Some pdf files are not getting deleted from Samba fileshare. The sequence to reproduce this bug is as follows. Copy 150 PDF files in a shared folder. Open the file share (FILE_SHARE) from Windows XP+SP2. 1. open 1.pdf file then close 1.pdf file 2. Delete the 1.pdf file. 3. now, open 2.pdf file then close 2.pdf file 4. Delete the 2.pdf file. Repeat

Hi, is there nobody in the community with the same problem or solution for the problem mentioned below? CU, Michael >From: "Mickey Smith" <speedcracker@hotmail.com> >To: samba@lists.samba.org >Subject: [Samba] Linux CIFS-access problem since samba 3.0.25(a/b) >Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:56:37 +0000 > >Hi there, > >at first, the following scenario is

Hi All, I've got some performance issues with Samba and Vista that I just can't seem to figure out. Googling and fiddling has all been in vain up until now, so I'm not sure what I can do other than wait for Samba 4, but maybe someone here can find something I've missed. First off, the server is an Athlon 64 1.8GHz running Gentoo 2006.1, tested with both Samba 3.0.24 and

Hi there, at first, the following scenario is used in our environment: Server-Side: - One Samba PDC using 3.0.24 release with TDB-backend. - Some Samba member servers serving files, home-dirs, etc. Client-Side: - Windows XP-Clients. - Windows Vista Clients (testing). - some Linux Ubuntu Distro (Feisty) Clients, using CIFS to access the samba-shares. fstab-entry of the Ubuntu-clients:

Quick question... The docs for vfs readahead mention Windows Vista, but what about modern Windows versions? Windows Server 2016 or Windows Server 2019? Thank you, -- BOB BUCK SENIOR PLATFORM SOFTWARE ENGINEER SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER 250 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 T (212) 298-9624 ROBERT.BUCK at SOM.COM

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:21:48PM -0400, Andrew Richards via samba wrote: > Hello, > > We recently deployed Samba 4.5 on Debian Jessie-derived Linux with kernel v4.5.7 sharing an XFS filesystem. > > We are migrating a large data set from old NetApp filers to the Samba share. While attempting to monitor the progress of the migration, we are observing very slow population of

Hello, We recently deployed Samba 4.5 on Debian Jessie-derived Linux with kernel v4.5.7 sharing an XFS filesystem. We are migrating a large data set from old NetApp filers to the Samba share. While attempting to monitor the progress of the migration, we are observing very slow population of filesystem metadata in the Properties window (specifically the General tab for info like "Size"

I updated all my servers to 3.0.25 early this morning. Everything seems 100% A-OK except for the most surprising thing, all my Windows and Macintosh clients, no problems. But I'm having severe difficulty with the 3.0.25 smbclient. If I use smbclient from 3.0.24 it too can connect to my 3.0.25 servers without issue. Its bizarre. Before I go into it let me say, I've got some 3.0.25

Hi. I have problems, when upgraded from samba sernet 3.0.24 to 3.0.25 (too early ?): 1) always must change password, when log in to windows XP professonall - samba 3.0.25 PDC - password expired 2) I can't browse widnows network on client machine - network broswer in WinXP don't respond - just hangs 3) I cann't priny any more to printers attached to another widnows machines

Hi, I'm currently using v3.0.24 in production and all works well. I'm testing 3.0.25 to see if I'm going to have any problems with it if I have to upgrade. I have a problem with the "force group" setting if it is set to a local Unix group. This same setting works fine in 3.0.24 but I'm denied access to the same share in 3.0.25. If I comment off the "force

Hi there I was using "username map" under 3.0.24 so that when I connected from DOM\jhaar under (ADS Win2K3) Windows, it was mapped to my local "jhaar" Unix account - with homedir "/home/jhaar", etc. However, when I upgraded to 3.0.25, I started getting NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE errors - even when just trying to list the shares. This occurred using smbclient as well as

I should have noted; we did try an 'ls -R' on the Samba server itself on the same directory to try to rule out the local filesystem being behind the lag. That command returned almost immediately, which led us to believe that something with how Samba is relaying the filesystem metadata to the Windows clients was to blame. Is Windows Explorer querying all the subordinate ACLs recursively