similar to: [SAMBA-SECURITY] CVE-2007-0452: Potential DoS against smbd in Samba 3.0.6 - 3.0.23d

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Potential Denial of Service bug in smbd == CVE ID#: CVE-2007-0452 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.6 - 3.0.23d (inclusive) == == Summary: A logic error in the deferred open code == can lead to an infinite loop in smbd ==

Hi there. I'm running Samba 2.2.3a on RedHat 7.1 + kernel 2.4.17. My girlfriend's laptop is running Windows 2000 + service pack 2. She has about a thousand MP3s stored on a Samba share on my RedHat machine. We were finding that she couldn't rename any MP3s on the Samba share: she would always get a sharing violation. After a day of reading Samba logs at debug 10 (_such_ fun [ ;)

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Cheerio! > -slow Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in [PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements incorrect. Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

i have a question for the people who sponsor the samba team. "when are you going to realise that your money is being wasted by not sponsoring me as a design architect on NT compatibility software suites for unix?" here - yet again, another demonstration of how much money you have been wasting. hopefully this time this "really new" proposal - i.e. yet ANOTHER idea and

Hello, We are running into the problem in slower performance on oplock. Here is the oplock scenario. - We are using 3.0.22. - Kernel oplock has been implemented on hp-ux 11v3. - smb.conf kernel oplocks = Yes oplock break wait time = 0 fake oplocks = No locking = Yes oplocks = Yes level2 oplocks = Yes oplock contention limit = 2

Hi all ! I've been using group mapping for a few weeks and found some bugs... For three of them, I tried to develop a small patch. I don't know Samba code very well and this is my first patch, so there could be errors :-p I hope my investigations will be useful :) * Platform : Here is what I used : Debian 3.0r1, Samba 3.0.2rc1 - PDC, OpenLDAP 2.1.23 as backend smb.conf extract :

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote > the attached patch. Great catch you guys ! Thanks for taking a look, I've been busy on other stuff for the past few weeks. Let me go through the issue and proposed code *really* carefully :-). The open code can be really tricky (as you've

On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 23:58 -0600, shivappa Sangapur via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using samba-4.7.x > I have some confusions over "map to guest=" options with setting SMB > Signing >  > > I want to understand why in case of *#2 and #5* it is not opening > shares of > my smb-4.7.x shares, > This is probably a case we haven't really

Hi all ! This is a patch for Group mapping bug #1 reported here : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-January/034057.html It activates users' primary group SID update when adding/modifying/deleting a group mapping. It patches utils/net_groupmap.c (net_groupmap_add, net_groupmap_modify, net_groupmap_delete) and can be applied to samba-3.0.2rc1. net_groupmap_add : Scan users

winbind primary group = 213478 winbind force primary = no // this is the default, but I just wanted to be explicit Stephen A Jazdzewski Steve@Jazd.com <<samba-2.2.4-forceprimarygrouprid.patch>> ------_=_NextPart_000_01C1FC4A.A7164AC0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="samba-2.2.4-forceprimarygrouprid.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, I have encountered some strange behaviour after upgrading to 3.0.12 on FreeBSD 4.10 file servers. Normally when users on windows apps use the file browser to select a file it remembers the selected directory between invocations, so that, for example, they can easily read in multiple files from the same directory, or if they click on Save As... it takes them to the directory where they

Using Office2K (Word & Excel) on NTWS 4.0 and samba 3.0.0 on Debian Linux, kernel 2.4.21. 1. Run Excel and create a sheet. Save it to the Samba server. No problem. 2. Close the sheet and open a new one (File->New). 3. Try to save the new sheet over the first one and Excel gives the error: "Cannot save the file. 'H:\test\Book1.xls' is not a valid file name." 4. Click

I'm trying to copy a 400 MB file from a Windows 98 host to a FreeBSD 4.5 Samba server providing access to a FAT32 filesystem. I've got "strict allocate = no", but from what I can see with debug set to 10, it is doing a ftruncate which takes about 50 seconds to complete. It appears that Windows gets impatient and generates an error (while Samba is still waiting for the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ~ Dear List, ~ My Win2k and WinXP workstations are endlessly complaining about can't ~ create central copy of the user profile, because of ..., or something ~ like that (in hungarian). When I'm trying, even as root to change the ~ acls of anything in the profile share I get an error, with other shares ~ this is working perfectly (I have ACLs

Greetings everyone, I have a question about the smbpasswd encrypted database and /etc/passwd -- why does the passdb backend require an entry in /etc/passwd? Is it possible to create samba encrypted users without a /etc/passwd entry? I have a samba PDC setup that is mainly just a login server, then a separate server for $HOME's. I have all of my PAM configs setup to remotely authenticate

Hello, (please excuse poor translations of german Windows-GUI-items) a customer of ours has a strange problem trying to install a printer driver on the print$ share. The driver in question comes from http://www.kyocera.de/kyocera_n/german/downloads/downloads.html -> choose 'Treiber' -> choose 'Produkt Typ: Drucker', choose 'Produkt: FS-6020', choose 'Sprache:

OS platform: FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p25 Filesystem: ZFS Samba version: upgraded from 4.1.17 to 4.1.22 Problem: I have been using the shadow_copy2 and zfsacl VFS modules to enable access control and the Previous Versions feature for Windows clients. With /usr/local/etc/smb4.conf configured this way (excerpt): vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl shadow:snapdir = .zfs/snapshot

Hi All, I don't know if this is a samba problem or not, but if users want to add files as an attachment in Lotus Notes and MS Outlook, and these files reside on samba shares, they get an "access denied" message. This "access denied" message refers to the whole share not only a file. Samba Server version is 3.0.4 on Sparc Solaris 8 acting as AD Member Server (W2K DC).

Experienced a strange bug in 3.0.4, but I think I've seen Jeremy discussing this with another on the list with respect to root dir access to a share, but can't find a bug in bugzilla. WinXP-SP1 Goes to My Computer/Properties/Device Mangler/Net Adap/Update Driver/Have Disk When the attemp is made to browse the 3.0.4 share they get Access Denied (they are an admin user on the share)