similar to: SNIA 2008 Storage Developer Conference CIFS/SMB/SMB2 Plugfest

Hi! On behalf of SNIA, I'm pleased to share the following invitation to the SNIA SMB3 IO Lab EMEA taking place alongside SambaXP. Samba XP is being held April 7-8 in Goettingen, Germany. The SNIA SMB3 IO Lab EMEA is being held April 8-10 following Samba XP! https://www.snia.org/smb3iolabemea https://sambaxp.org/ The purpose of the IO Lab is for vendors to bring their implementations of

Chris Hertel just wrote up a new Samba Team blog entry about the SNIA SDC conference here: http://samba.org/samba/news/developers/2011-snia-sdc-report.html It's a great read for people who weren't able to make it ! Ping him at crh at samba.org if you have any questions about it. Cheers, Jeremy.

Good evening, On the bottom of page 53, section 4.1.2.2 in the SNIA spec (http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/CIFS/CIFS-TR-1p00_FINAL.pdf), it states if the dialect is NT LM 0.12 and extended security is off (I.e., use "traditional" NTLMv2/NTLMv2 authentication w/o SecurityBlobs), the SessionSetupAndX response is as shown in section 4.1.2.2 with a word count = 4. However, what I have

Hi All, The Samba Team has started a blog to try and keep people up to date about what is going in in the fast moving world of Samba development :-). The second edition is available here: http://news.samba.org/developers/Samba_Team_Blog_2/ and contains details of the recent SNIA plugfest with Microsoft and other vendors. I'm still bugging people to get comments added (sometimes it seems

Dear all, what is about the support for POSIX ACL in Samba protocol implementation of SMB2 and SMB3? >From what I extracted from SNIA and SambaXP developer conference talks and as well as the official Samba Wiki, support for POSIX ACL in SMB2 and SMB3 has been completely abandonned. Am I right? If so, is there any other possibility to allow Linux Clients to natively access access control lists

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 03:05:12PM +0000, Kraus, Sebastian via samba wrote: > Dear all, > what is about the support for POSIX ACL in Samba protocol implementation of SMB2 and SMB3? > From what I extracted from SNIA and SambaXP developer conference talks and as well as the official Samba Wiki, > support for POSIX ACL in SMB2 and SMB3 has been completely abandonned. Am I right? Yes.

> 'ioctl command to query network info' requires SMB Signing been turn-on > looks like not mentioned in [MS-SMB2] spec document, though through > wireshark caputures it did force client to sign the request packet, will > ask dochelp for help later to make sure (iirc SambaXP/SDC/SNIA conference > Obaid's talk seems mentioned it)

In current kernels we have the new IOCTL / QueryInfo passthrough where you can use a simple ioctl() on an object in a SMB2/3 share and pull the full security descriptor. It would be fairly trivial to expand this to allow setting the security descriptor too using SetInfo. We can add that when there is a need. Now, since this is available through a simple ioctl() interface, you can access this

ACL management can be done for SMB2/SMB3 ACLs with two common tools depending on your preference. smbcacls (somewhat similar to using cacls.exe or icacls.exe in Windows but specifying the UNC name rather than a local path name). smbcacls sets up and tears down a network connection each time it is run and uses Samba user space code. or setcifsacl/getcifsacl (which calls cifs.ko to access the

Thanks for the first reply, Jeremy. What about the (future) implementation of RichACL? Will there be any native Linux Client support along with the SMB2/SMB3 protocol? I know, there is a native implemenation for RichACLs in ext4 FS. Unfortunately, smbcals is not a native Linux ACL Tool and has a very unhandy syntax. I just tested some days ago. ;-) I am looking for a solution that allows the

Hi Samba-people, Arnold Jones, Technical Council Managing Director or the Storage Network Industry Association (SNIA) asked me to forward this invitation to anyone who would like to participate in the SMB3 IO Lab. --------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Samba Developers, Presentations are only part of what is going on at the SNIA?s 2023 Storage Developer

Hi Samba-people, Arnold Jones, Technical Council Managing Director or the Storage Network Industry Association (SNIA) asked me to forward this invitation to anyone who would like to participate in the SMB3 IO Lab. --------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Samba Developers, Presentations are only part of what is going on at the SNIA?s 2023 Storage Developer

Hi Rowland, I'm here at the Microsoft plugfest trying to help a vendor join a Samba AD-DC (I just did a standard local provision on my laptop using the internal DNS server). They fail due to looking for a DNS name of: _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.sambadom.example.com (I provisioned with the standard realm name of sambadom.example.com). Should we be creating this record on provision ? It seems

Dear Samba users and hackers, I'd like to remind everyone that SambaXP 2025 is getting closer. SambaXP will take place on April 7th and 8th on-site in G?ttingen, Germany once again. This annual event promises to bring together Samba enthusiasts and experts for an interesting and enjoyable two-day conference. https://sambaxp.org/ The call for papers is still open. If you wanted to submit

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:24:36 -0700 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I'm here at the Microsoft plugfest trying to help > a vendor join a Samba AD-DC (I just did a standard > local provision on my laptop using the internal DNS > server). > > They fail due to looking for a DNS name of: > > _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.sambadom.example.com

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:43:02PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:24:36 -0700 > Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi Rowland, > > > > I'm here at the Microsoft plugfest trying to help > > a vendor join a Samba AD-DC (I just did a standard > > local provision on my laptop using the internal DNS > > server).

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:50:27 -0700 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:49:01AM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:28:24 +0100 > > Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, after downloading WindowsPE 10 and installing it in a VM, I > > > can confirm two things,

Hello Samba folks, Server 2012 has an option to create encrypted shares which enable in-transit data encryption between Windows 8 clients using SMB 3.0. ( http://blogs.technet.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/communityserver-blogs-components-weblogfiles/00-00-00-47-85-metablogapi/2313.clip_5F00_image00111_5F00_757A262D.jpg ) I ran across a presentation from Michael Adam where he mentioned

Hi I think I hit the cifs bug described at http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares and http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1776 As CentOS Wiki said, CentOS 5.0 do have a bug fixed cifs.ko, so I thought it should be in CentOSPlus repository ... so I upgrade my kernel and using 2.6.18-8.1.10.el5.centos.plus. After I use this kernel release, I check the cifs.ko and see the following: $

Hello, Two questions for you this evening. How do you tell the difference between NTLMv1-style authentication and NTLMv2 style? The CIFS dialect NT LM 0.12 does both(?), so does not appear in the NegProtRequest message (nor in the flags, near as I could tell). Do you ascertain this by examining the SessionSetupAndX message? If so, what parts? Is it possible to have more than one CIFS