similar to: Rsync 2.6.3pre2 released

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Rsync 2.6.3pre2 released"

2004 Aug 16
1
testing rsync 2.6.3pre1
I announced the release of 2.6.3pre1 on the rsync-announce mailing list back on the 12th. I was thinking at the time that this email would get seen by those on the regular rsync list, but I forgot that this is not how the rsync lists are setup. For those that missed it, here is the text of the announcement: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have
2004 Sep 08
2
--keep-dirlinks in combination with --one-file-system
I've been using the --keep-dirlinks feature of 2.6.3pre1. I also use -x (--one-file-system) and --delete-after. The symlinked directories on the receiver are symlinked to a partition other than the one where the target of the rsync resides (that's the whole point of this nifty --keep-dirlinks feature). I discovered that the symlinked directories are not being processed for deletions.
2008 Feb 20
0
[PATCH] Fix typos in NEWS.
--- I proofread NEWS and here's what I found. NEWS | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index d1f62be..2edb43f 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -116,11 +116,11 @@ Changes since 2.6.9: options are set correctly for the current batch file: --iconv, --acls, --xattrs, --inplace, --append, and --append-verify. - - Using
2005 Mar 15
0
[Bug 2455] New: rsync --daemon segfaults if "log file = <file>" dir does not exist
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2455 Summary: rsync --daemon segfaults if "log file = <file>" dir does not exist Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2004 Aug 28
0
[Bug 1673] New: Verbose dry run doesn't report replacements of symlink with directory
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1673 Summary: Verbose dry run doesn't report replacements of symlink with directory Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2004 Aug 23
0
[Bug 1646] New: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1646 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: ard@waikato.ac.nz
2005 Mar 01
1
Rsync 2.6.4pre2 released
I've released rsync 2.6.4pre2. It was a little sooner than expected, but I wanted to get the new keep-alive packets out for testing. Plus, one backward-compatibility bug had the potential to be rather annoying. The changes since 2.6.3 are here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.4pre2-NEWS The changes since 2.6.4pre1 are as follows: - Added a keep-alive packet
2005 Mar 01
1
Rsync 2.6.4pre2 released
I've released rsync 2.6.4pre2. It was a little sooner than expected, but I wanted to get the new keep-alive packets out for testing. Plus, one backward-compatibility bug had the potential to be rather annoying. The changes since 2.6.3 are here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.4pre2-NEWS The changes since 2.6.4pre1 are as follows: - Added a keep-alive packet
2011 Sep 12
2
Ignoring /boot
Hi, I have the following script that I'm writing to backup my gentoo linux system. ----- start of script ----- #!/bin/sh # # RSYNC_OPTS="--archive --one-file-system --perms --executability --progress --stats --delete-after --hard-links --keep-dirlinks --verbose --inplace" RSYNC_USER="bs" RSYNC_SERVER="192.168.6.6" RSYNC_MODULE="ben-desktop"
2007 Feb 03
1
Man page suggestion: organize options into sections
Dear rsync people (particularly Wayne), I think it would be helpful for the options in the man page to be divided into sections based on which aspect of rsync's behavior they affect. Each section could also document rsync's default behavior when none of the options are given. Collecting all the possibilities for each aspect of rsync's behavior in one place would make it much easier
2004 Sep 05
1
minor typo fix for 2.6.3 pre 1
I'm sure that someone's gonna complain that parsing the output is messed up by this patch, but then they should have told about the typo themselves :-) --- log.c.orig 2004-08-17 10:25:57.000000000 +0200 +++ log.c 2004-09-05 16:28:42.000000000 +0200 @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ { RERR_WAITCHILD , "some error returned by waitpid()" }, { RERR_MALLOC , "error allocating core
2004 Sep 20
1
rsync version 2.6.3pre1 protocol version 28
Hi, this is possibly a bug report (I'm not sure if this is a feature). It's related to the --keep-dirlinks option, when combined with --delete . I have the following directory structure on server A: ls -lR software software: total 238 drwxr-xr-x 2 biolord bioinf 1024 Sep 20 10:49 EMBOSS/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 biolord bioinf 6 Feb 5 2003 MSE -> EMBOSS/ lrwxrwxrwx 1
2007 Jul 30
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4834] New: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4834 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: joost@seat-ibiza.nl
2012 Nov 21
1
[Bug 9416] New: --files-from : RERR_PARTIAL vs RERR_VANISHED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9416 Summary: --files-from : RERR_PARTIAL vs RERR_VANISHED Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: penning at uu.nl
2009 Oct 03
1
--keep-dirlinks --delete erroneously deletes symlinks to directories
Hi, the combination of --keep-dirlinks and --delete (--delete-during, --delete-delay) erroneously deletes symlinks to directories on the receiver. With --delete-before and --delete-after it works as expected. (rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version, on Debian Lenny) I don't think that this behaviour is intended. Details/example: - Host 1 directory-structure: drwx------ ./1
2008 Jul 09
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5601] New: extend --keep-dirlinks to files also
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5601 Summary: extend --keep-dirlinks to files also Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: hendrik.maryns@uni-tuebingen.de
2005 May 19
3
Rsync 2.6.5pre2 released
I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying bugs that made it into 2.6.4, though a few minor enhancements did make it in as well. To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre1-NEWS To read the pre-release man
2005 May 19
3
Rsync 2.6.5pre2 released
I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying bugs that made it into 2.6.4, though a few minor enhancements did make it in as well. To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre1-NEWS To read the pre-release man
2004 Aug 20
3
Using --keep-dirlinks : recursive symlinks problem
Hello folks, trying to make use of the new --keep-dirlinks feature for a synch port; it works excellent but feels incomplete without a way for rsync to ignore recursive links. Example: # ls -la . total 6 drwxrwxr-x 2 bldmstr staff 512 Aug 16 21:42 . drwxrwxr-x 8 bldmstr staff 512 Aug 16 21:41 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 bldmstr staff 2 Aug 20 12:07 bogus -> .. if you use
2008 May 17
0
Rsync 3.0.3pre2 released
I have made rsync 3.0.3pre2 available for release testing. This is another bug-fix release, with the only "enhancements" being made to the manpages and the testsuite. These are the changes that have happened since 3.0.3pre1: - Fixed the combination of --xattrs and --backup. - Fixed several places in the code that were not returning the right errno when a function failed. -