similar to: User Manager for Domains -- Groups not showing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "User Manager for Domains -- Groups not showing"

2012 Nov 23
6
Samba PDC group list empty
Dear samba users, I have very strange problem. I have Samba PDC up and running, but only thing is missing. I cannot see any Domain Groups at all. Here is my config: Debian Squeeze: ii samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze8 SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix ii samba-common 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze8 common files used by both the Samba
2016 Dec 13
2
wbinfo -u does not listed trusted users, wbinfo -n works
Running a mix of samba versions (3.6.25 and 4.5.1) in two domains- one "classic" (with samba domain controllers) and one AD (with windows domain controllers.) The eventual goal is to drop the classic domain in favor of the AD domain. Also trying to move from samba 3.x to 4.x since Samba 3 is EOL'd. the "wbinfo -u" command will list users in the servers domain
2005 Sep 01
1
wbinfo problems and documentation questions
Hi all, I have a samba pdc running 3.0.20 + the patches on http://hostopia.samba.org/samba/patches running RHEL4 on an x86_64 platform. I have configured it to use an ldapsam backend per http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/2000users.html Since there is not much in the way of testing listed in the "2000users" section I used the tests listed under the making users happy
2016 Dec 19
1
wbinfo -u does not listed trusted users, wbinfo -n works, idmap not working
On both Samba 4.5.1 member server and Samba 3.6.25 member server I tried the following command wbinfo –set-uid-mapping=35049,S-1-5-21-xx-xx-xxx-xxx this should have created a mapping entry consistent with the one on the domain controller for a trusted user But I got the following error failed to call wbcSetUidMapping: WBC_ERR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED As far as I can tell from network
2009 Jan 30
0
Groups not Showing
I have a network of about 100+ users with a Samba 3.0.25 server with an LDAP backend that I configured myself (with some help). Recently I have had to add about 300 more users to my system and now I need to get a slightly less technical person to help me manage the accounts. I've been happily using smbldap-tools all of this time, but when I showed what I do to my hapless trainee, her eyes
2008 Oct 16
1
LDAP backend and sambaGroupType for builtin groups
Hi, I have a question about sambaGroupType attribute on a Samba 3.2 PDC with LDAP backend (and nss_ldap + nss_winbind). What should be the value for Administrators builtin group ? If i use smbldap-populate from smbldap-tools, the value of sambaGroupType is 5 (and the LDAP entry for this group is a posixGroup and a sambaGroupMapping). I've also noticed that "wbinfo -g" doesn't
2006 Feb 01
6
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root
I'm using Samba 3.0.14a as a PDC with an LDAP backend. I am having trouble using the Windows "User Manager for Domains" tool. As an example, I shall be looking at the "Domain Users" group. Whenever I try modifying anybody's group membership, I get the error message: "The following error occurred changing the properties of the global group Domain Users: The
2013 Jan 03
1
samba-tool domain classicupgrade with LDAP backend
Hi I am testing the migration from our actual Samba domain, based on Samba 3.3.8 and LDAP (389DS) to Samba 4. I have followed the Samba4 Howto, and I have successfully compiled it. Now I am running the classicupgrade command, but I am getting some errors. First of them is that the script is ignoring the "ldap group suffix" parameter in smb.conf, and is always searching in the
2007 Dec 10
1
Samba+LDAP Group mapping
Hi, I'm running into weird problems after switching from tdbsam to ldapsam user backend. I have transferred all local unix and samba groups with the sambaldap-tools scripts. The 'net groupmap list' command prints all group mappings correctly, and I also can use all the groups present in LDAP for setting local file ownerships. However these groups don't appear in the windows
2005 Aug 05
3
Help! About SAMBA_PDC and SRVTOOLS
I want to use NT4's SRVTOOLS to manage the Samba-PDC,But when i use it ,i mean ,when i add a account for windows,Samba can only receive the username from the tool. The others ,such as logon_path,Fullname and Description cannot be received by samba. Is some thing wrong with samba? what can i do ? I add the information of a user to the LDAP-server by LDIF-file handly .It works fine.And the
2008 Apr 03
1
Listening on conversations for training?
Hello I assume it's possible to do this with Asterisk: To train a new worker who works remotely, I'd like to have him listen in on support calls so that he gets to learn the kind of problems that come in, and how they're solved. When a call comes in and the support person thinks it's worthy to have the trainee be part of it, he will ring the trainee so he can join the call.
2014 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] Using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper (redux)
> Reading the bitcode reader while working on another issues I found > that we already have a version in the bitcode itself (not the darwin > wrapper) and it is used! It is stored with the > bitc::MODULE_CODE_VERSION. It is used to select relative ids, which > impacts the entire bitcode, and so it makes sense to be based on a > version. > > If we ever have a new feature
2012 Jun 07
4
ldapsam_getgroup
Hello, hello I'm writing you this email because when i want to set up a password policy with LDAP, this one isn't recognize by samba. In the log i've got this : ldapsam_getgroup: Did not find group, filter was (&(objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(sambaSID=S-1-5-11)) ldapsam_getgroup: Did not find group, filter was (&(objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(sambaSID=S-1-5-2))
2008 Feb 07
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] fix warning: 'NumFolded' defined but not used
lib/CodeGen/RegAllocLocal.cpp:38: warning: 'NumFolded' defined but not used This has been introduced because of r46821. However, maybe removing just the variable isn't enought, because the comments in the section that got modified by 46821 are not optimal: if (PhysReg) { // Register is available, allocate it! assignVirtToPhysReg(VirtReg, PhysReg); } else { // No
2014 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper (redux)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Right, that version number is used to resolve *ambiguities* in how to > > interpret some chunk of bitcode. It is not a generic bitcode version > > scheme, because most bitcode format changes involve things like adding > > new operands or opcodes, which are easily identified
2005 Feb 25
1
Srvtools causes smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root
I am using Samba 3.0.10-1 on Fedora Core 3. Most everything seems to be working as I expect it to except when I try to use the srvtools package to administrate the users and groups in the domain. I want to check and see whether maybe I am just misunderstanding usage as opposed to their being a configuration problem. If I log into my workstation as Administrator, either the local account or into
2006 Aug 09
2
samba3, srvtools, and user account with no password
hello, i've just finished in setuping my simple samba pdc (no ldap, just tdbsam), everything work, i can create account from a xp client with srvtools, modify propoerties of a user/groupe, no problem. but but, i'm unable to let account with no password, i mean, when i'm creating/modify an account with srvtools, i've got the error "access denied", but when i put
2003 Oct 09
3
Samba3+Nexus+Srvtools at least strange
Hi all, Sorry for distubing you with this minor problem, but: I've configured samba3 for ldapsam and successfuly joined a WinNT Server 4.0 with on the fly account creation (I have root in LDAP). Now I'm able to manage my samba3 with user manager for domains from srvtools, but not nexus :-(. From my point of view the sadest thing is that on 9x no other application can retrive user
2012 Aug 20
3
samba 3.0.14a works with ldapsam backend but not 3.5.10-125.el6
we are migrating our standalone Samba sever (3.0.14a) on a Solaris 10 box to an RHEL 6.3 box. Testing shows that on Solaris 3.0.14a works with both the OpenLDAP server we are currently using and the IPA2.2 server as LDAP backend. But 3.5.10-125.el6 on a RHEL 6.3 box does not work with either. I can still map a share with 3.5 as owner of the shared directory, but secondary group ownership does
2017 Mar 24
3
4 DC's to downgrade
Okay I didn't read that. surprised that it should work with the databases as is. The dbcheck function was quite involved when it was run on the 4.5.5. update. On Thursday, 23 March 2017, 20:21, Ray Klassen <julius_ahenobarbus at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: After upgrade massive slowdown network wide. Does not make sense that it's the samba, but I've nothing left. Question