similar to: [PATCH] (+tests) with_scope :order doesn''t work with included associations

I have set up some fixtures in test/fixtures/users.xml: # Read about fixtures at http://ar.rubyonrails.org/classes/Fixtures.html admin: id: 1 username: admin password: admin pbarry: id: 2 username: pbarry I have a unit test for my user model: require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../test_helper'' class UserTest < Test::Unit::TestCase fixtures :users def

Just looking at adding the ActiveRecord::Base#find! method that was spoken about a while ago now, and just wondering what''s the best way to add these tests in? My problem is that for 75% of the tests in finder_test.rb [1] I also want to ensure that find! or find_by_name! or find_by_sql! works alongside the regular finds. I can duplicate the tests: def test_find

Allow users to specify certificates to be used for authentication on the command line with the '-z' argument when running ssh. For successful authentication, the key pair associated with the certificate must also be presented during the ssh. Certificates may also be specified in ssh_config as a CertificateFile. This option is meant the address the issue mentioned in the following

Hello all, This is to announce the creation of R-sig-wiki, a new R SIG (Special Interest Group) mailing list dedicated to the elaboration and maintenance of a R Wiki. You can subscribe at: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-wiki. There is currently a prototype for a new R Wiki at http://www.sciviews.org/_rgui/wiki (temporary address). The main idea is to offer a site where users

Why does with_scope work with .create, .find, but not with .new? It breaks all scaffolded code :( -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, It seems that setting a with_scope on the parent class doesn''t do anything MyClass.with_scope(:find=>{:conditions=> ["somecol = ?", ''val'']}) do @ext_pages, @ext_rows = paginate :my_extended_class, { :per_page => 13 } end # this doesn''t generate WHERE somecol=''val'' In order for scope to work you have to call

Hi there, I have something like the following: class Person < AR:B ... ... has_many :votes has_many :chosen_answers, :through => :votes, :source => :answer, :select => ''DISTINCT answers.*'' do def my_answers(whodunnit) chosen_answers.with_scope(:find => { :conditions => [ "votes.created_by=?", whodunnit ] }) do chosen_answers.find :all

>From what i can gather the with_scope feature doesn''t allow you to specify which columns get selected. It appears to default to "*". So if i specify something like: Question.with_scope( :find => { :from => "questions q, answers a", :conditions => "q.owner = a.owner AND a.owner=1" }) do ... end I''ll generate SQL like: SELECT *

Has anyone successfully gotten the scoped_access[1] plugin to work in Rails 1.1? Some of the methods it was relying on are now no longer accessible. It seems the only way to add scope is to use the ''with_scope'' method that takes a block, but since Rails doesn''t have real around filters[2] I cannot see a way of adding a scope using a filter. Anyone using with_scope

i got two controller (with restful actions) where my code is quite ugly and not very dry. every action looks quite like this: if @logged_user.has_role?("admin") User.find(params[:id) else @logged_user.group.user.find(params[:id]) this is a security check that enforce a simple spec: normal user should read/write information only about their group''s users, but

There are areas of my application that "want" to use a url structure like domain/<human_readable_param>/<Module>/<Controller>/<Action>/<Id> Please note that the human readable parameter I need to inject is NOT related to the <id> being used by the action/controller pair. It''s identifying a container object whose contains are operated

Hi I would need to synschronize some Netscape stuff to a server ("roaming profiles" are not included anymore in the recent versions of Netscape). In particular I'd like to synchronize bookmarks, address book and mail filters. So I need to synchronize ONLY the following three files (that are in the mozilla directory work/mozilla) to the remote server (in the directory

The build failed. CHANGES ------- Revision 8688 committed by nzkoz on 2008-01-22 01:29:10 Add options missing from earlier changeset M /trunk/activerecord/lib/active_record/test_case.rb TEST FAILURES AND ERRORS ----------------------- Name: test_ordering(FirstSecondHelperTest) Type: Failure Message: <"first mail"> expected but was <"">.

hey, i have users who are in groups, and i have a search form, where i can search on group, user lastname, and user firstname. All this is also with pagination. these are my models class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :groups end class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :users end in my controller i do this THIS works (but in need pagination) @users2

I have the following code: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :requests do def find_active(options = {}) with_scope :find => { :conditions => ["requests.active = ?", true] } do find(:all, options) end end end end Executing user.requests.find_active results in the following SQL: SELECT * FROM requests WHERE (( requests.user_id = 10 ) AND (

"bitsweat" has given AR/SQLServer some love, but it''s still unhappy... http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/6912 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r6912 | bitsweat | 2007-05-31 10:15:56 -0700 (Thu, 31 May 2007) | 1 line Fix an edge case with find with a list of ids, limit, and offset. Closes #8437.

So, I hear that with_scope is going to be deprecated. Which is a bit of a shame, given the stuff I''ve been writing recently. I have a CMS with multiple clients. A ''client'' is essentially a company, with multiple users. Content on the site belongs to a client - content could be messages, images, schedules, etc etc. People belonging to one client should not be able

Hello all, I still have a patch for #3438 (eager loading doesn''t respect association orders); it passes all unit tests, and has additional unit tests with full coverage. The patch is attached. == The Bug == Author.find(1).posts != Author.find(1, :include => [:posts]).posts if Author has_many :posts, :order => anything. This means that either one must avoid eager loading or

The build failed. CHANGES ------- Revision 8671 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-19 03:45:24 Support aggregations in finder conditions. Closes #10572. M /trunk/activerecord/test/cases/finder_test.rb M /trunk/activerecord/CHANGELOG M /trunk/activerecord/lib/active_record/aggregations.rb M /trunk/activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb TEST FAILURES AND ERRORS -----------------------

On December 14th, 2004 David Heinemeier Hansson sent this to the mailing list: I''m seeing a lot of new names on the list. Could we perhaps do a round of introductions? That would also be a great first post, if you haven''t had a chance to contribute yet. The basics should include your name, your organization, your country and city, and the project you''re