similar to: Upgrade samba from 3.28 to 3.29 to fix winbind issue.

Greetings Everyone, I finally got around to downloading and installing CentOS 3.1. Performed flawlessly :) Any of my whitebox friends still around here? I've been extremely busy with work as of late....I'm still considering getting involved with CentOS. -- Donavan Nelson donavan at whiteboxlinux.net http://whiteboxlinux.net

I would appreciate any ideas on how to correct the problem that we are having that is outlined below. Thanks for your help. I have been running samba for a long time. Currently we are having problems with it filling up /var/log/messages with Feb 7 10:45:02 servername smbd[2157]: Can't become connected user! Feb 7 10:45:02 servername smbd[2158]: [2008/02/07 10:45:02, 0] smbd/

Hi, I am deciding on what 'RHEL clone' to use and prefer to use one that has a quick release after RedHat releases an update. I checked the repositories, but have not encountered any of the latest errata. Am I looking at the wrong place ? Thanks, Taco

>> bugzilla.redhat.com and provide us with the bug number there? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ralph >> > >Red Hat Bug 389021 opened on 11-17-07. RedHat released updates for samba late last week: samba-2.2.12-1.21as.8.2 samba-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3 samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4 samba-3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4 They fixed the linux-linux directory panic issue with this update as

Hello I am leaving Whitebox because of lack of up to date sec. updates. Did any body try to "upgrade" WBEL to CentOS? Any dificulty or problems? Thanks Petr Klima

Hello all, I'm running samba server ?3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4 on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 6). The server is set to be a part of the Windows AD domain. The domain name is IIS. In the /var/log/samba/wb-IIS.log I keep getting the messages similar to: [2008/03/23 09:01:01, 3] lib/charcnv.c:convert_string_internal(265) ? ? convert_string_internal: Conversion error:

Hi, We are running a RHEL4 x86_64 server, samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4. The server is running with essentially the same configuration since a year without problems. Due to a hardware failure on the back-end SAN the samba-server was moved to a different machine (same OS, same samba version, same config). At about the same time we deployed SP2 on various W2300 machines (there are in total about 50 W2003

Just tried to install RPMs to a RHEL 5.5 64-bit machine, failed too. #rpm -ihv --nodeps http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-tftpboot-3.86-1.x86_64.rpm error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: Bad Magic #rpm -ihv --nodeps http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-tftpboot-3.84-1.x86_64.rpm error: unpacking of archive failed on

Hi there We are having a problem where the DNS "A" records of ADS member Samba servers are disappearing from DNS. It's not routine, but it is definitely real. What we normally do is assign static IPs, create DNS records manually and then install and configure the Samba server (mainly CentOS4 and CentOS5) and "net ads join" it to the domain. This is normally good for a

Hi, We have an office-based Windows-locked publishing system whose only delivery mechanism is to write to a local filesystem, and a requirement for its output to be available to a collocated production environment comprising Solaris and Linux boxes. The 'obvious' solution was to run a Samba server on one of the collocated Linux boxes and mount the share it provides on the relevant

Hello *, i get following error: Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies .....Unable to satisfy dependencies Package rpm-libs needs rpm = 4.2.3-13.WB2, this is not available. I switch from WhiteBox to Centos. How can resolve this problem?

Hi, Anyone know if Asterisk and Digium Hardware supports Centos-3.1 which is clone of Redhat Enterprise 3.1 server.? -- Best regards, Frankie (fgravato@cfsdigital.com) mailto:nanog@cfsdigital.com

Hi Is it possible to swap the yum.conf from my centos box onto my whitebox box and have the whitebox machine use centos updates through yum? CentOS seems further ahead and far quicker at roll outs than whitebox? thanks

In an effort to prevent getting many minutes into an installation only to have a CD read fail (I did verify the CD's first), I did a minimal install. Can I use the minimal install to add the necessay packages for a HTTP server and graphical interface? Todd -- Ariste Software 200 D Street Ext Petaluma, CA 94952 (707) 773-4523

Hi all Can you tell me what is the different between fedora / redhat enterprise / centos and whitebox? Thank you ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news

Hi to the list, I am trying to find a way to painlessly move structured data back and forth between R and Matlab (also Octave). For this purpose I found the R.matlab package great help. I wish to use a Matlab -v6 MAT file as an intermediary format, because it is well read by both Matlab and Octave. It is also well read by 'readMat' function in R.matlab package, but that is where I run

Well, I'm a recent convert from WBEL. My biggest concern with CentOS is that the community here seems to want to be more than a recompile of RHEL. But WBEL is floundering, what with Katrina and Rita, and there really being only 1 developer behind it, etc. I offer an automated shell script to switch from WBEL4 to CentOS4 (easy, it's hosted on my home DSL line!) It assumes that

I've been following the faq for moving from whitebox to centos (which admittedly is for release 3, but using the equivalent release 4 files) and keep getting stuck when installing the centos-release-4-2.1 rpm which says it should replace whitebox-release4.2 However this is not happening, giving me the following rpm -Uvh

Hello all I migrated my Centos installation from a whitebox install few months ago. Only one minor issue...on booting up X, the login screen shows whitebox logos. At that time, I did not tackle it because I assumed that it will automatically be upgraded with yum...and again it was not essential to running the OS. What whitebox rpms do I need to substitute with centos ones to correct this

Hello several months ago I install WhiteBox Linux on several severs, I was happy, not woriing about upgrading every 1,5 year as when I use RH 4.0, 6.0, 7.3, 9.0 .... And then WhiteBox went black, WBEL updates release slowed down and maintainer wont help form anybody. Just telling "If you want quick updates, build it yourself.". I prefer wasting time for customizations and/or