similar to: Disappearing user name

I'm straddling the half-way point between samba and ldap. When adding a machine to the domain, functionally, it works like you would expect. You enter in the domain, enter your credentials, and reboot. The computer is able to function as a machine on the domain. I'm using the smbldap-tools as suggested in the wiki. Here's the script: add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd

Following the instructions here ( http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/Fedora_DS_1.2.3), I got to the DS provisioning step and encountered an error trying to provision the 389-DS (v1.2.3 B2009.280.1622). The source was checked out around 12/30/2009 ~16:00 GMT following the instructions provided in the 'howto'. I have made sure that system.domain-test.local is listed in the

Hi, i have followed the idealx tutorial to the letter, however i get this error when i try to start slapd: ambepdc# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd start Starting slapd. /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf: line 74: index type "uidNumber" undefined this is my slapd.conf ambepdc# cat /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf # # See slapd.conf(5) for details on configuration options. # This file

I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. I launched the CentOS boot DVD and CentOS correctly identified the card and the RAID 5 array as configured by the controller's BIOS. My question now is:

Hello, i?ve some problems setting the initial password for Windows and Unix User with Samba configured to use LDAP as backend. I?ve attached the configuration files and the errors. Creating a new user with net rpc user add "xyz" is working without problem. Using for example GQ as LDAP browser, i can see the account and also getent passwd is showing the entry. I?ve activated ldap

> On May 10, 2019, at 8:59 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for delay, I was busy with other stuff. > CTMark results. > > dse is the current DSE. > dsem is my experimental module level DSE. > dsem runs after dse, so it's additionally deleted stores. > > -O3 > dse - Number of stores deleted

Let me be the first (maybe): CentOS 5.2 is here (at least): http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/ Thank you all who worked on it! -------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 22-06-2008 7:52

I'm struggling with trying to create a unified, ldap-backed for my home network. I have an existing directory that handles my posix logins correctly and I'm able to auth smb users against those accounts, but I'm not able to join any machines to the directory. It would be profoundly helpful to see a ldif dump of a working configuration. Surely others have created similar setups at home

Can you post numbers for how many stores get eliminated from CTMark? > On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > I tried -Os and effect of new approach significantly increases. > I run regular DSE and immediately myDSE. With -Os myDSE removes more than 50% of DSE number. > Which is expected as -Os inlines less and regular DSE can't

Hi, Over the past six months, a MemorySSA-backed DSE implementation has been added to LLVM and it now covers almost all cases the existing DSE implementation does, plus adding a major new capability: eliminating stores across basic blocks. Thanks everyone involved with reviews, testing & patches! I think now would be a good time to start working towards switching to use MemorySSA-backed DSE

Hi JF, I've heard that you are interested DSE improvements and maybe we need to be in sync. So far I experimented with following DSE improvements: * Cross-block DSE, it eliminates additional 7% stores comparing to existing DSE. But it's not visible on benchmarks. * Cross-block + Interprocedural analysis to annotate each function argument with: - can read before write - will

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:02 PM Amara Emerson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 2019, at 1:51 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi JF, > > > > I've heard that you are interested DSE improvements and maybe we need to be in sync. > > So far I experimented with

Hi, As a project for a computer performance analysis paper I am taking this semester, I am going to look at the performance of the memory manager in R, with the aim of determining how fast it is and which areas most need improvement. The idea is that I will compare various versions of R, starting with 0.64.2, and then at a few stages in the implementation of the new memory management scheme (of

Hi, If I try to do this: if(is.R()) data("eg1.DSE.data.diff", package="dse1") model <- est.VARX.ls(eg1.DSE.data.diff) (Page 14 - DSE Package Manual) I obtain a Segment Violation. I use R-1.3.0 and the last dse package version Maximino Ameneiro Gomez -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

Hello, I would like to find a way to do this removal properly. I found DSE and "eliminateNoopStore" can be useful for this thing. What I mean? int *test = malloc(15 * sizeof(int)); test[10] = 12; < ----- remove this store memset(test,0,sizeof(int) * 15); I already checked the function "eliminateNoopStore". Looks good, I think I would be to get the value ("A") we

> Full ack! +1 > > Regards > Tim > > Am 12. Februar 2015 22:12:45 MEZ, schrieb Miguel Medalha > <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>: >> >> I am using a Samba 4.1.16 as an Active Directory domain controller. >> >> After a lot of time complaining to myself that my users' properties >> sheet in ADUC did not contain the Unix Attributes tab, it

All; I have an application that dials a list of numbers and then plays a recorded message. My customer uses it to dial a list of customers to confirm their appointment for the next day. No biggie, maybe 25 - 30 calls per day for customers who want the confirmation call. What they need now is a way to dial an extension after the number is dialed and answered. I've seen that before, but I

Hi, It looks like the DeadStoreElimination optimization doesn't work across BasicBlock boundaries. The project I'm working on (https://github.com/trailofbits/mcsema), would tremendously benefit from even simple cross-block DSE. There was a patch to do non-local DSE few years ago (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-January/028751.html), but seems that the patch was never

memoryIsNotModifiedBetween is precisely the sort of expensive walk we shouldn't be doing... I'm surprised it hasn't caused any serious issues yet.  Ideally, what we should be doing is using MemorySSA to find a dependency from the memset: if the closest dependency is the malloc, there aren't any stores between the memset and the malloc.  (But we aren't using MemorySSA in

Sorry.. One more email.. I tried to create the IDMAP container on the LDAP with an example I found: dn: ou=Idmap,dc=softeng,dc=com objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: idmap structuralObjectClass: organizationalUnit and it gives: adding new entry "ou=Idmap,dc=softeng,dc=com" ldap_add: Constraint violation additional info: structuralObjectClass: no user modification allowed