Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Problem syncing large dataset"
2002 Aug 05
5
[patch] read-devices
Greetings,
I'd like to propose a new option to rsync, which causes it to read
device files as if they were regular files. This includes pipes,
character devices and block devices (I'm not sure about sockets). The
main motivation is cases where you need to synchronize a large amount of
data that is not available as regular files, as in the following scenarios:
* Keep a copy of a block
2009 Apr 26
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6293] New: rsync crashes when transferring files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6293
Summary: rsync crashes when transferring files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.5
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: dirk.samba@miriup.de
2003 Aug 24
1
readdir() and read() errors ignored
We've just been hit rather badly by a very nasty bug that can cause rsync
to silently discard files or fill them with zeroes. It happens when e.g.
opendir() succeeds but readdir() returns an error; rsync does not check
for an error from readdir() and so simply ignores the error (along with
any remaining files in the directory). No error is reported to the user,
who will then happily
2004 Aug 02
4
reducing memmoves
Attached is a patch that makes window strides constant when files are
walked with a constant block size. In these cases, it completely
avoids all memmoves.
In my simple local test of rsyncing 57MB of 10 local files, memmoved
bytes went from 18MB to zero.
I haven't tested this for a big variety of file cases. I think that this
will always reduce the memmoves involved with walking a large
2002 Feb 06
2
Error from rsync-2.5.2
Hi,
I have compiled the new version 2.5.2 rsync in our servers,
then ran rsync last night, there were some files not copied
to destination server, both source and destination servers are
running 2.5.2, I got the following error messages, can you
please let me know what would be caused the errors? I copied
back 2.3.2 version on both servers, and rsync went well.
Thanks for the help, here is
2011 May 29
22
[Bug 8177] New: Problems with big sparsed files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177
Summary: Problems with big sparsed files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.8
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: joluinfante at gmail.com
2006 May 18
1
Regarding [Bug 1936] lseek failed in map_ptr
Rsync has begun failing to replicate a kerberos samba mount point. This mount point has worked previously, but recently an attempt to replicate the mount point returns;
lseek failed in map_ptr
rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at fileio.c(228)
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes: phase "unknown": Broken pipe
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code
2005 Sep 20
2
Nulls instead of data
In short:
Platform: linux with 2.4 kernel
Version: rsync 2.6.6
Command line:
rsync266 -av -W --bwlimit=1 /mnt/somedir/rsync-2.6.6.tar.gz ./
Destination: local disk
Source: file on a smbfs mounted filesystem; share is exported on a NT 4.0
workstation over a very slow and unstable link
Result: Rsync completes operation with no special message, but the
resulting file is damaged, large
2002 Feb 16
2
map_ptr error
We're using rsync to mirror a web server. The rsync is initiated using
ssh from a Red Hat Linux 7.2 box, the files are located on an Alpha
running a version of Digital Unix 4. On the Alpha rsync is 2.5.2, The
Linux box used to have a 2.4.6-X version, but with the map_ptr problems
I built 2.5.2 on that as well. However, version incompatibility was not
the problem, as they persist after the
2002 Feb 20
8
map_ptr warning
I am trying to finalize the use of rsync for updatiung a new nfs server
before we take the old one offline. I keep getting the following
warning during the rsync process:
Warning: unexpected rad size of 0 in map_ptr
Any ideas where this comes from and how to make it go away? I am using
rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 8 to pull data from rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 7.
Bob
roconnor@vectorpartners.com
2004 Oct 15
0
[Bug 1936] New: lseek failed in map_ptr
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Summary: lseek failed in map_ptr
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: jitbose@yahoo.com
QAContact:
2002 Feb 15
1
unexpected read size of 0 in map_ptr (Solaris 2.5.1)
Hi list,
Since upgrading rsync to version 2.5.2 on a Solaris 2.5.1 box,
I see plenty of
Warning: unexpected read size of 0 in map_ptr
when doing my nightly backup (rsyncing some directories
to an rsyncd on the same LAN). I have never seen this message
before, and I only see it on the Solaris machine (I upgraded
all my other machines to 2.5.2 as well).
I hope this is not a FAQ... I did not find
2001 Aug 06
1
merge rsync+ into rsync (was Re: rsync-2.4.7 NEWS file)
> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch?
Thanks for the reminder.
I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the
"branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody
screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or
Wednesday.
I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the
man page, so we should fix that in the future.
2004 Jun 16
3
[Bug 1463] New: poor performance with large block size
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
Summary: poor performance with large block size
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: wmatthews@sepaton.com
2003 Jun 27
1
bug? -z option and large compressed data
Hi,
I think I found a bug in usage of zlib. rsync 2.5.6 with -z fails
like bellow.
% cp install-disk2.iso /var/tmp/install-disk2.iso
install-disk2.iso 100% |*****************************| 316 MB 00:56
% rsync -vIz install-disk2.iso 127.0.0.1:/var/tmp/install-disk2.iso
install-disk2.iso
deflate on token returned 0 (16384 bytes left)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol
2020 May 24
3
[PATCH] file_checksum() optimization
When a whole-file checksum is performed, hashing was done in 64 byte
blocks, causing overhead and limiting performance.
Testing showed the performance improvement to go up quickly going from
64 to 512 bytes, with diminishing returns above, 4096 was where it
seemed to plateau for me. Re-used CHUNK_SIZE (32 kB) as it already
exists and should be fine to use here anyway.
Noticed this because
2013 May 17
2
[Bug 9894] New: Rsync can silently zero out chunks in a file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9894
Summary: Rsync can silently zero out chunks in a file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: an.m at outlook.com
2002 Feb 19
2
rsync-2.5.3pre1 preview release -- please try it
Available now from samba.org and all mirrors. Please report bugs,
compilation problems, etc. If there are no major issues I think I
will put this out as 2.5.3 shortly, because it fixes a few serious
issues. Thanks to everybody who contributed patches.
rsync://samba.org/rsyncftp/preview/rsync-2.5.3pre1.tar.gz\*
rsync 2.5.3 (not released yet)
SECURITY FIXES:
* Make sure that
2010 Nov 23
1
[RFC PATCH] fadvise support in rsync
Warning for kernel folks: I'm not much of an mm person; let me know if I got
anything horribly wrong.
Many folks use rsync in their nightly backup jobs. In these applications, speed
is of minimal concern and should be sacrificed in order to minimize the effect
of rsync on the rest of the machine. When rsync is working on a large directory
it can quickly fill the page cache with written data,
2003 Mar 30
1
[RFC][patch] dynamic rolling block and sum sizes II
Mark II of the patch set.
The first patch (dynsumlen2.patch) increments the protocol
version to support per-file dynamic block checksum sizes.
It is a prerequisite for varsumlen2.patch.
varsumlen2.patch implements per-file dynamic block and checksum
sizes.
The current block size calculation only applies to files
between 7MB and 160MB setting the block size to 1/10,0000 of
the file length for a