similar to: --password-file

Timo, I joined the lemonade list for the new IMAP sending protocol and I mage the following suggestion about using IMAP as a front end for SMTP. The idea would be that a client could authenticate to IMAP, then ask for a tunnel to the SMTP server. - Here's my message. I thought I'd get people thinking. --------------------- OK thanks. I would clarify what I'm proposing. I looked

Hi! I have next setup: PDC: Samba 3.0.25b-apple, Mac OS X 10.5.8 server. (Lets call it Serv2) Machines can join domain. Clients can use kerberos to authenticate. Everything works pretty good. Domain member: Samba 3.2.7-11.4.1-2210-SUSE-CODE11, OpenSUSE 11.1. (Lets call it Serv2) this server joined domain. Clients can connets, server authenticate clients on domain controller, everything good,

Hi all, I am having *massive* problems trying to exclude a single directory from an rsync. I have serv1 and serv2. I am trying to rsync /foo/test from serv1 to /foo on serv2 I want to exclude the directory /foo/test/dir1 So I try: rsync -av --exclude-from=/foo/rsync.excludes /foo/test serv2:/foo rsync.excludes contains: /foo/test/dir1/ This is not working. I also try: rsync -av

Hello Dovecot community, Below please find a patch that adds support to dovecot-1.2.11 for: - RFC 4467 - IMAP URLAUTH Extension - RFC 4468 - Submission BURL - RFC 4469 - IMAP CATENATE Extension URLAUTH URLAUTH is added as a plugin so it can be disabled to satisfy site security requirements. Each user's URLAUTH keys for all mailboxes are stored in a file named

Will MultiMaster dsync work fine or will be big problems ? I configured dovecot to dsync from serv1 to serv2 to serv3 and repeat to serv1 to serv2 to serv3 and repeat... When email received to serv2, it will be synced to serv3, and serv3 will sync it to serv1, and serv1 will sync it to serv2 and will stop here because emails matched. What problems can be with this kind of configuration ?

Is there a way to tell rsync that if it does not have contact with a certain rsync server to continue on to another for file requests? I imagine something like this, where you define two servers as the source... /usr/local/bin/rsync {serv1,serv2}::src dest ...proposing that 1. Should serv1 be down when the sync is originally started, that serv2 be contacted after a timeout. 2. Not so

v2.2 hg now has support for NOTIFY extension. The only thing missing is support for SubscriptionChange events. Now would be a good time for IMAP clients to start implementing and testing it. :) I remember K9 developers at least said they were just waiting for Dovecot to support it first. v2.2 implements some other extensions also: BINARY, CATENATE and MOVE. Stephan has also implemented URLAUTH

Hello all, It''s my first letter on this list, and, my English is not very well. Please take me indulgence for grammar/syntax and over erorrs :)) I have trouble for acl''s of ip range. But, acl for one host (with ip adress) work fine. Please help me for make work acl/find erorr in acl. Becouse I''m new shorewall user, I maked test configuration on Virtual Mashine

Small patch to correct spelling of lemonade. Should ask Sean if he really wanted it to be lemonaid. If not, here''s the patch. On another note... This sample works! Kudos. It is odd that the textbox doesn''t scroll. I suppose I may patch that, too. Roy _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org

Hello list. I'm planning a new mail servers for our company's customers to replace the oldish Courier-IMAP based one, we already started to deploy some mail accounts on a dovecot-2.0 server as an early test. I'd like to implement the new system with dovecot-2 (I'll probably go straight to dovecot-2.1.x) and I'd like to get it right from the beginning so I'm here asking for

I try to implement a new server using domain auth ( server , pdc , bdc are on redhat 9 samba3pre1) Smb.conf of server: [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = G4 server string = %h server (Samba %v) security = domain password server = SERV2 SERV3 (PDC and BDC) wins support = no wins proxy = no wins server =

> -----Original Message----- > From: jean-marc pouchoulon > [mailto:jean-marc.pouchoulon@ac-montpellier.fr] > Sent: mercredi 22 octobre 2003 14:54 > To: 'jean-marc pouchoulon'; samba@lists.samba.org > Cc: eric.jourdan@ac-montpellier.fr > Subject: RE : [Samba] Samba 3 pre01 security=domain problem to > accessfromxpclient > > > Just one more thing > With

Hello All! First of all i would like to exuse my english then. While trying to join samba 3.0.10 to domain get the following error #net join TEST -U Administrator Administrator's password: [2005/03/05 15:56:41, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(186) ads_connect: Interrupted system call Joined domain TEST. Problem is that samba did not auth users. And they need to enter password. It's

Has anybody migrated samba from one machine to the other? I have tried migrating from a PC running Linux to a PC running Solaris, and all worked fine at first, then when I turned off the original machine, the NT ACLs stopped showing up (the Solaris box happily reported the ACLs at the unix level) I tried turning the original machine back on and, to my surprise, the domain attached to the ACLs

I have two Caldera Linux Intel boxes running as Samba servers (1.9.18p8) using an NT server (SP3) for user authentication and have no problems. I cannot get a new box to work this way. The new machine is a DEC Alpha running Red Hat 5.1 with Samba 1.9.18p5 (pre-installed). The smb.conf file contains (among other things): encrypt passwords = yes security = server password server = XYZ Using the

Hello. Sorry I didn't post it under the "how to make..." email - I didn't received it - I only found it in archives. But I think we both mean the same. All this below regards samba on debian etch: 3.0.24-6etch4 I have a share on partition mounted with acl (options=acl,...). As you know I can locally on server add another ACL entries on files in that folder. When I connect with

When ONE PARTICULAR user connects to \\mydev\oubsgout <\\mydev\oubsgout> the user (running win95) connects( from windows explorer) but only sees top level directories in the share. Any ideas as to why only one user should be affected?The network between the client PC and the server checks out ok. When the user attempts to expand one of these top level directories a messagebox appears stating

Thank you Timo for beginning the port of URLAUTH, BURL, and CATENATE from 1.2 to 2.0. Attached please find two patches that finish the port to 2.0. One patch updates the dovecot-2.0-urlauth branch and is based on the tip of that branch. The other patch adds the full support to dovecot-2.0.beta5. The resulting URLAUTH/BURL/CATENATE code is the same. Please let me know if you have any questions

Ok, this time without hitting send accidentally... 1) Please write to the proper mailing list. Swfdec is not getting enough mail to make splitting the commit mail worth it (yet ;)). 2) I don not really have a clue about ffmpeg, and all its weird options and features. I just know enough to make Debian's version work in swfdec. And I don't really care until there's something out

Quoting owczi@owczi.net: > Hi Benjamin, > > Please excuse me not writing to propper mailing list but I saw mostly > commit reports there. > I was just trying to compile swfdec + swfdec-mozilla 0.4.3 tarballs, but > finally the compilation died on 'undefined reference to `img_convert''. > My distro (PLD Linux) has ffmpeg built with swscaler and therefore >