similar to: Getting mad with group permissions

Hi, When I use "valid users" in smb.conf to limit access on my share, I have this message with smbclient : [global] workgroup = MYDOM domain master = no local master = no security = user passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://x.x.x.x:389 ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=company,dc=com ldap suffix = dc=company,dc=com ldap user

Hi, We have been running samba file server about 2 years without this problem. The problem appeared at the same time on our debian and centos servers. Not sure if it's related to any updates on our windows AD servers. Debian Squeeze sernet-samba-3.5.8-27 Centos 5.5 samba3-3.5.5-43.el5 Use Active Directory for user login authentication Use uid/gid from ldap The reason we still want winbind

Hi I'm using Samba 3.6.3 on ubuntu 12.04 as a domain member with AD on Win Server 2012. My hare is configured like this: valid users = @"EVSOFFICE.LOCAL+dangroup" When I try to connect to a share via IP from Win7 (part of the domain) it succeeds but when use host name \\node15 I can see shares but double-click on share shows AccessDenied. I'm trying to connect as

Hi, I am trying to use squid proxy with validation on win 2003 active directory to filter internet navigation and for it I installed an ubuntu 10.04 server 64 bit with samba. My installation looks ok, the server is joined to the AD, ntlm is able to validate user, wbinfo report corret information and squid works good. The problem arise after some hours: winbind become not able to resolv info

For the last 3 weeks I've been working on getting RHEL4 (and 5, but that's a different story) to play well with Active Directory, OpenLDAP, Kerberos, PAM and NSS. It's been a long struggle but I now have a process to authenticate and authorize a RHEL4 client to a windows Active Directory server to that my AD Users can log into my Linux boxes (assuming their group permissions are set

Hi, after upgrading samba from 4.1.17 to 4.1.19 on OpenSuSE 13.2, any shares offered by this machine can nolonger be accessed, when these shares contain an entry "force group" which specifies a local unix group and when there exists a unix user with the same name. Here's an excerpt from smb.conf: [FactWork] comment = FactWork-Downloadportal path =

We've got nicely ADS integrated Samba-3.0.27a servers that are working fine with Win2000 through to standard Vista. However, we are starting to test RC1 of Vista SP1 and discovered that once applied, that workstation cannot connect to Samba server shares - unless the share is open - i.e. no "valid user" style settings. The moment one is defined, Vista fails to connect and pops up an

hello, I'm trying to migrate a rather simple configuration from a Samba 2.0.6 to Samba 2.2.8 , on an AIX system. smb.conf stays exactly the same & checked with testparm. File sharing works fine again, but not printing : smbd meets an internal error when a NT box tries to launch a print job. Sample of logfile : [2003/03/19 16:42:56, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(456) user_in_list:

Hi there, I use FC5. I discovered, for an exemple, if you have a user group with 3 members (Alan, Baker, Clive), before 3.0.23c this line at smb.conf worked fine: valid users = @user But with 3.0.23c update it doesn't work anymore. You have to replace the line like this: valid users = Alan, Baker, Clive I mean, replace the "@groupname" with the complete userlist of the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Volker, Assume I have a member server named LINUX joined to a domain name AD. Now assume I have a local user named foo in my passdb and a user named foo in the domain as well. I'm modifying winbindd_util.c:parse_domain_user() to do a lookup_name() to try to figure out which domain to prepend to the username rather than just assuming its a domain

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Alex Vasylenko >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 >Description: rsync does reverse name

Hi all, I seem to be having a problem identical to this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 in Samba 3.0.28, however the bug is supposed to be fixed by now. I have a Fedora 7 box joined as a member to Windows 2003 domain. All my Windows users have accounts on the Samba machine, with the same user name in Windows and in Unix. I have a share with valid users = +group, where

We had to power down all servers today for electrical maintenance in the building and for some reason I began having access problems related to the valid users lists when power was restored. The dialog from the 'Samba-3.0.23 broke my network' thread seemed as if it might be related even though I had not performed any software upgrade so I tried adding the group mappings as discussed in

I am attempting to get a Debian box running Samba 3.0.23d (latest from debian testing) to work with our shiny new Windows 2003 server PDC. I can join the domain. windbinds various wbinfo commands return all the groups and users, as does getent. I can access everything from the PDC. Effectively, everything works _except_ specifying a group to 'valid users'. My smb.conf[0] is run of the

Hi I have been working all week with samba 3.4.7 in Centos 5.5 PDC(3.4.7) with LDAP backend+Centos 5.5(3.4.7) BDC with LDAP slave. I already have 5 clients join. 1 Windows XP 1 Windows 7 UE 1 Centos 5.5 Desktop 1 Ubuntu 9.x 1 Centos 5.5 I can browse inside windows and see my clients, access some shares. I want to create private shares inside my PDC, I use: force group valid users write list

My opinion: Local users should always take precedence. People should specifically refer to local users as <SambaHostName>\localuser, if that is the form the SMB client insists on sending. Tacking on default domains and/or stripping domains to/from user names and "trying them out" is playing fast and loose with user identity and is a breeding ground for potential security holes.

Hi, I'd like to build a personal PBX connecting 4 or 5 analogic phones with a ADSL line and I'd like to know what is the right card I need I visited digium site and I think TDM400 could be the right choice but I cannot understand how it works...I think it has 4 slots where 4 modules (FXS or FXO) can be inserted. How many cards do I need to connect my ADSL line to 5 phones? I think I

All; I am using the cobalt Qube 2 which uses a Cobalt OS with is supposedly a RedHat Linux 4.2 variant. I can not compile the new rsync version 2.5.7 as I always fail my make with the following error: clientname.c: In function `client_addr': clientname.c:72: warning: implicit declaration of function `getnameinfo' clientname.c:73: `NI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared (first use this function)

Hi, I've just updated (using yum under fedora 5) to the latest version of samba and am now encountering a major problem with samba. Whenever I attempt to access shares (don't have printers or other such non disk shares) the access fails (after prompting for password, and performing some level of authentication, it notes if no password is entered that Anonymous login successful).

Hello, I am running samba on a machine running fedora 5. I did not know the system was configured to automatically update the system via cron, and when it put the new samba on last night, seems to have broken things. It is coredumping now whenever a user tries to authenticate. Our system is set up with user level security which i manage via smbpasswd so there are no windows domains involved. The