similar to: samba machine accounts problem

Hello List, I have 2 samba domain on 2 physical Servers but the User Administration is over 1 LDAP Server. At the moment i become some errors on my first PDC box: smbd[16074]: sid S-1-5-21-3194266148-564761370-2586249389-101652 does not belong to our domain (Thats all hosts from the second PDC) * first samba Server SID = S-1-5-21-3991578539-3149662252-1894531253 * second samba Server SID

Hi List, Last week i have upgrate my samba from 3.023d to 3.0.28 and now i have some trouble in my LOGs like this: Dec 31 08:59:23 ldapmaster smbd[10453]: pdb_increment_bad_password_count: pdb_get_account_policy failed. Dec 31 08:59:39 ldapmaster smbd[12758]: [2007/12/31 08:59:39, 0, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(211) Dec 31 08:59:39 ldapmaster smbd[12758]:

Hi List samba 3.0.31-36 openldap2-2.3.43-1.1 log level = 3 I have a problem, in my domain user log i see this: <snip> 2008/11/19 08:06:04, 3, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3 [2008/11/19 08:06:04, 1, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_getsampwsid(1501) ldapsam_getsampwsid: More than one user

Hi... I have had a problem when I am going to detach one specific LVM partitions of Xen, so I have been trying xm destroy <domain>, lvchange -an <lvm_partition>, lvremove -f.... So I haven''t had sucess. I restarted the server with init 1 yet and nothing... I have seem two specific process started xenwatch and xenbus, but I am not sure if this processes have some action over

Hello, i am using samba4rc2. I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get very long response times from interal queries. root at s-srv01:~# dig s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P4 <<>> s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64478 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra;

Hi there. I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both network. In the srv02 there is samba version 4.15, which is in the DMZ network 10.10.100.0/24 The first is an additional controller for

On Fri, 17 May 2024 12:36:33 -0300 Gilberto Ferreira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there. > I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, > both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. > In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network > 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both >

Hi all, Earlier I emailed the list on some issues I was having with Windows 7, and one of those issues was the trust relationship breaking down after one month. I think I have some more light to shed on this topic. First, some environmental facts I am running Ubuntu Karmic 9.10 with Samba 3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 I have installed the latest LDAP schema into OpenLDAP 2.4.18-0ubuntu1 I have a working

Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. Any fix about this issue? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5)

Hello, I've just installed samba with ldap on a debian etch. I have a problem when i attempt to create a user with the command smbldap-useradd -a -P -c "toto DUPONT" -u 1001 toto and to log in with it after. I obtain this error : [2008/10/29 17:35:26, 0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(164) pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for toto [2008/10/29 17:35:26, 1]

Hi I am testing running tinc in switch mode. , my topology is as follows Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -> Site 2 (tinc-srv02) I have configured the bridge interfaces with ip addresses and able to ping between bridges. I then setup a server on each site and tested layer 2 connectivity between the two servers. Topology as follows. Server 1 - *Site 1* (tinc-srv01) -> *Site 2* (tinc-srv02) - Server 2

The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the patch and check if the problem persists ? On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. > > Any fix about this issue? > > May 14 07:05:39

Hi Xavi That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 07:45, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: > The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the > problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:56?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xavi > That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? > It should be safe, but I wouldn't test it on production. Can't you try it in any test environment before ? Xavi > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 -

Ok. No problem. I can test it in a virtual environment. Send me the path. Oh but the way, I don't compile gluster from scratch. I was used the deb file from https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/ --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 09:21, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: >

Hi again I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd apt list --upgradable Listing... Done glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfapi0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfchangelog0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:00?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again > I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd > > apt list --upgradable > Listing... Done > glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2

Is it possible to have a standalone Samba server map different username/password pairs to a single Unix account? More specifically, I'll be using an external passdb (pdb-mysql or LDAP), and each username will only see a home directory with the same name. But I don't want to have to create a separate Unix account / UID for each username/password, the restriction by directory is enough.

Anybody also has this error? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-: Assertion failed: May 14

Hello, in the last days I switched from Xen 4.2.1 to Xen 4.2.2 (source from git repository tag 4.2.2) commit a125ec6a4a2f028f97f0bdd8946d347a36dbe76b Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Date: Tue Apr 23 18:42:55 2013 +0200 update Xen version to 4.2.2 My "base system" is a debian squeeze. For Xen I use the xl toolstack. Since updating to 4.2.2 the autosave and