similar to: Nested groups are completely missing

Sorry about the dumb question: Are the "BUILTIN\Administrators" and "BUILTIN\Users" local (nested) groups supposed to be populated with DOMAINNAME\Domain Administrators and DOMAINNAME\Domain Users (respectively) by default? If I download the Redhat Samba package, they are populated. Not so with a compiled version. I've had a helluva time populating BUILTIN\Administrators

Probably an easy one for most of you: I'm trying to create nested groups on my Samba server. When running "net rpc group add" I am prompted for my root password and receive the error: "Failed to connect to IPC$ share on localhost". When I use my other login I receive: # net rpc group add Admins -L -U bill Enter bill's password: Failed to add alias 'Admins'

Hey folks... I'm using the Redhat Samba package (samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1) and I'm having a problem with one specific user. When she opens a project for her program, there are several shape files which need to open. Unfortunately, performance is EXTREMELY slow for her; everyone else who accesses the project can open it up quickly and normally. A tail of /var/log/samba/<IP

Hello all! I have a data frame with nine variables and 293 cases. (attached goes the csv file). I need to calculate a index using the sum of one variable (N) divided by the length of other variable (Fisherman), but for each day (Date). I tried to use that codes: by (cpue, cpue$Date, function (x) sum (cpue$N)/length(cpue$Fisherman)) tapply (cpue$Data, cpue$Data, function (x) {sum

On 08/24/2017 09:40 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > On 17 August 2017 at 15:15, Rodney M. Bates via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> For an indirect call, i.e., on a function whose address is runtime variable, >> I can't find any place/way to attach this attribute. LLVMAddAttribute >> won't take a type. > > In the C++ API you'd add the

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0780 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0780.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f5a3bfd84a7225cfc366e2af24313ed9bec6ffbab90497fbe3bb58bbd9649a62 avahi-0.6.25-12.el6_5.1.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1140 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1140.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c05c0eb98850d7593eec0089f6d64c2a81df5bdf2e0cce873cc1b4666dee1191 avahi-0.6.25-12.el6_5.3.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1663 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1663.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 2da08ce1a4e3ab757f29c482bc187f630bd756c987d9c7d084b9778e7a4f7277 avahi-0.6.25-15.el6_8.1.i686.rpm

I need to set the 'next' attribute on a parameter. If the function is to be directly called, i.e., a function constant, I am getting what I want as follows (using the C 'Core.h' binding) 1) Build a function type, using LLVMFunctionType. 2) Build a function value, passing the result of 1) to LLVMAddFunction 3) Go through the formal parameters of 2), using LLVMGet[First|Next]Param,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0528 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0528.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 28e9fe626208b2f04015fa4c2168bafe avahi-0.6.16-9.el5_5.i386.rpm a0f73643f040354b4cb9a2b3138018d6 avahi-0.6.16-9.el5_5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0436 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0436.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: eaa18c4146ee6a0d6bb4bf9760a9b2b5 avahi-0.6.16-10.el5_6.i386.rpm 1f27d25834e49ff5522a5db706ea4f0b avahi-0.6.16-10.el5_6.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:0183 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0183.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: d9e301f787f9d52204a111af639f106c559c08a8e87a2354e3261d890a578db6 avahi-0.6.31-15.el7_2.1.i686.rpm

I just installed CentOS-5 but when I try to update I get this: # yum clean all Loading "installonlyn" plugin Cleaning up Everything [root at inet02 ~]# yum update Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates 100% |=========================|

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I''m getting some weirdness with integration testing. The following works fine if I don''t have parameters, but as soon as I add parameters I get a hang. Not sure exactly where it is hanging. NO HANG post ''user/register'' HANG post ''user/register'', :user => {:name => ''John Doe'', :email =>

I am using dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4 on my system and decided to check the logs since I just took over as the administrator on this system and I noticed the same error entry over and over in the logs. I went to /var/log/dovecot.err and see: imap(rangry): May 22 13:33:31 Error: Error parsing IMAP envelope: "Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:10:01 -0400" "Re: Hi there I have a question"

I have a Proliant running Red Hat with the 2.6.9-5.ELsmp kernel. We have a Windows 2000 Server who's secondary disc drive is mounted on the Linux box via CIFS using the following command: /sbin/mount.cifs //w2000/docs /var/www/documents -o dir_mode=0777,file_mode=0444,gid=100,uid=501,username=winuser,password=winpass From time to time, for whatever reason, the Windows 2000 Server

It's now a multi-stage process. First, there is a difference between a permanent forward declaration (i.e. the actual definition is in a different file) and a temporary forward declaration (i.e. it will appear later in the same file). To create a permanent forward declaration: DICompositeType *result = m_DIBuilder->createForwardDecl( dwarf::DW_TAG_structure_type,

On 11/15/2015 01:29 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > On 15 November 2015 at 09:01, Rodney M. Bates via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> The latter is reduced to machine code by llc, the former is not, instead >> coming through as an external function call, which then fails to link. > > Is this for x86? I don't think that has a single instruction to >