similar to: Strange virtual users issues

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 SETUP: qmail + dovecot 2.2.10 + pigeonhole 0.4.2 I have a user who's quota is at 98% so theoretically when this user is receiving any mails qmail shout send a rejection message like user is overquota /vpopmail/domains/medianetork.ro/.qmail-default #| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox | DTLINE=${DTLINE/$USER-}

Hi; The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does reach their destination: [root qmail-send]# tail current @400000004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462 @400000004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from < suzieprogrammer at gmail.com> qp 23629 uid 508 @400000004b87b3d33b7f700c starting delivery 4: msg 97881462 to remote suzieprogrammer at gmail.com

FWIW, I use claws, which is about the only one not mentioned.? I don't like Thunderbird. For one thing, it is in caretaker status. Mozilla believes Web based mail is the "future." I rather not run roundcube, given I got hacked via an unpatched roundcube ?back when I was using a hosting company. ? Webmail just increases your attack surface.?

Hi all ... Happy to be back for a question/suggestion again .... I came accross this weird situation. I take care of a site running shorewall 3.0.5 in the firewall and qmail in the DMZ ( mail server ). A remote clients smtp server denies to accept more than one incomming smtp connections from my site :-(. In my site users are always sending mail to this server ( 50 - 60 per day ). So

since years mutt, 'cause it really sucks. I tried TB or claws, evolution, opera but always returned to mutt. Am 18. November 2016 06:31:43 MEZ, schrieb Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com>: >On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:07:15 -0800 >lists at lazygranch.com wrote: > >> FWIW, I use claws, which is about the only one not mentioned.? >> >> I don't like

Look up "roundcube", really straight forward configuration, once installed type in the IP of your server publishing it on a web browser and it will walk you through configuring it On 18 Nov 2016 07:16, <lists at lazygranch.com> wrote: > So does mutt suck or not? > > Original Message > From: Andreas Kalex > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:06 PM > To:

Hi, Plateform: gentoo + qmail My deliver line is in a .qmail-USER file: |/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f ${SENDER:-<>} -d user at domain.tld I notice that sieve implementation in Dovecot use double ">" for the envelop sender when there is a redirect command in sieve script. (i've tried preline -f, without -f ${SENDER:-<>},... but nothing

* lists at lazygranch.com <lists at lazygranch.com>: > So does mutt suck or not? If you work with vi and like it, chances are you will also like mutt. Personally I *love* mutt! No extra fat. Always on the spot. It is "liberal in what it receives and conservative in how it sends". Since it is command line program, I can run it almost everywhere. It supports local mailboxes,

lists at lazygranch.com skrev den 2016-11-18 03:07: > FWIW, I use claws, which is about the only one not mentioned.? lets see if dovecot will be webmail ng someday > I don't like Thunderbird. sadly > For one thing, it is in caretaker status. what ? > Mozilla believes Web based mail is the "future." do you have references for this somewhere ? > I rather not run

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:07:15 -0800 lists at lazygranch.com wrote: > FWIW, I use claws, which is about the only one not mentioned.? > > I don't like Thunderbird. For one thing, it is in caretaker status. > Mozilla believes Web based mail is the "future." I rather not run > roundcube, given I got hacked via an unpatched roundcube ?back when I > was using a hosting

So does mutt suck or not? ? Original Message ? From: Andreas Kalex Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:06 PM To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot? since years mutt, 'cause it really sucks. I tried TB or claws, evolution, opera but always returned to mutt. Am 18. November 2016 06:31:43 MEZ, schrieb Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com>:

Claws is an active project.? I became roundcube free when I set up my own mail server. ? I simply use an email client rather than a browser. Browsers can leak. Comments about the retired TB: ?https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/ -------------------- Practically what this means is that in 2016, Thunderbird will finally be able to accept donations from users directed toward the update and

Since 2008, Microsoft (formerly Revolution Analytics) staff and guests have written about R every weekday at the Revolutions blog (http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com) and every month I post a summary of articles from the previous month of particular interest to readers of r-help. In case you missed them, here are some articles related to R from the month of May: Many interesting presentations

On Wednesday 08 January 2020 09:37:10 Roger Price wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Gene Heskett wrote: > > ● nut-monitor.service - Network UPS Tools - power device monitor and > > shutdown controller > > Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/nut-monitor.service; enabled; > > vendor preset: enabled) > > Active: failed (Result: protocol) since Tue 2020-01-07 07:19:19

Currently on R I get the following: > file.access(c("doesNotExist", NA)) doesNotExist <NA> -1 0 where 0 means success. Is the 0 correct? I was expecting either NA or -1. ?file.access does not mention how NA values should be handled. The subsection "3.3.4 NA handling" from the R Language Definition manual suggest to me that file.access should return NA if given

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, well, I'm sort of sure that this was raised in the past, but I do not find the patch / answer of it: I'm running dovecot v1.0.15 from hg (5567:568687e4df02) with managesieve patch v9.2 (there is one change between this and v9.3 except in regards of AUTH so this should not matter.) and dovecot-sieve v1.0.3. When an user issues just

hi, mutt -f imap://max at test.local@127.0.0.1 Could not connect to 127.0.0.1 (Connection refused). lsof -i dovecot 20200 root 5u IPv4 233361 TCP localhost:imap2 (LISTEN) imap-logi 20204 dovecot 0u IPv4 233361 TCP localhost:imap2 (LISTEN) imap-logi 20205 dovecot 0u IPv4 233361 TCP localhost:imap2 (LISTEN) imap-logi 20206 dovecot 0u IPv4 233361 TCP

Hi Gents, (apologizes, new here...) I didn't find any hint on G**gle nor in the Dovecot archieve (maybe due to the lack of a search function :), so: I installed Doovecot, but can't get it going. The logfile states: > mail.info dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.15 starting up > mail.err dovecot: auth(default): Panic: Leaked file fd 5: dev 0.10 inode 3 > mail.err dovecot: Auth process died too

Hi, We're upgrading a cluster of servers from v1.0.15 to v1.1.x or v1.2.x. It appears that the UIDL generation mechanism has changed, and thus we'll be getting POP3 dups with users that leave mail on server (which is a nasty practice, I know). From checking the sources, and performing a number of controlled tests in various scenarios, here is the outcome: upgrade from 1.0.15 to

Hello list, I'm running into some problems, and I couldn't find any info about this anywhere on the net. I recently set up a new debian lenny machine, and used my notes from the last debian etch machine I set up, which basically is for postfix + dovecot for sasl auth. On my old etch box, in the dovecot.conf, in the auth default section, I have a socket listen { client { path