similar to: rspec model testing - test on user defined validation- How do I test that the create failed.

Hi - I have 3 fileds a user can fill out. They can fill out 2 of them or just one of them, for example. fill out these 2 fields: Field1 and Field2 Or fill out this field: Field3 In my model how do I use validates_presence_of for Field1 and Field2 or just Field3. I want to do something like this: validates_presence_of Field1, Field2 OR validates_presence_of Field3 So the user can fill out

I want to add virtual fields in a model. table: field1 field2 I want to add field3 which is field1*2 + field2 I know tihs can be achieved in View, but I want it in model. Then I will pass this model to PagerRenderer to paginate. How to achieve this? thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, How can I use a substring match as a condition in a subset command? Sth like this: subset(input, field1=="blah1" & field2=="blah2") # but now with substring match in field2 subset(input, field1=="blah1" & field3 *substringmatch* "blah3") I've tried with gsub, but it won't work: subset(input, field1=="blah1" &

Say I have a csv file, each row contains several fields, one of them are whether the row is success. In history data, I have all the fields including the result of whether it is success. In future data, I only have fields without the result. For example: history data: Field1 Field2 Field3 Field4 ResultField 1231 CA TRUE 443 TRUE 23231 NC TRUE 123 FALSE

Hi, I''ve got an interesting one here :) I have a form with three fields : serial_number initial surname now, if serial_number is entered, it must be between 1 and 64000. If it''s filled in, the other two fields must be blank. If serial_number is left blank then the other two boxes must be filled. Any suggestions? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

hi, read the API doc and made search with google but can''t get a precise explanation on how submit_to_remote work. can someone help on that? thanks

I believe that I may have found a bug in R. The top code sample gives an error as shown. However, by simply switching which field is initialized first as in the bottom code sample, it works as expected. This gives an error: a <- NULL a[["field1"]] <- 1 a[["field2"]] <- matrix(c(2,1), 1) Error in a[["field2"]] <- matrix(c(2, 1), 1) : more elements

Hi all, My current project brought forth the snippet below, which modifies in each row of a data frame a certain field depending on another field in the same row. Dealing with data of some 30000 entries this works, but is horribly slow. Can anyone show this newbie how to do this properly (faster ;0)? for (i in 1:nrow(dataframe)){ if

Hi, The following [simplified] query works well, however a variation which includes parenthesis seems to fail, in that it returns hits which should be excluded by the NOT term. This is surprising because in this simple case, the parenthesis shouldn''t change the Boolean evaluation ... any pointers? Working Query: field1:value1 AND NOT field2:value2 Failing Query: field1:value1 AND

hello everyone, i'm new to R, so i hope you dont mind a fairly basic R question. we're using R to manipulate the results of SQL queries and create an HTML output. I'm starting with a table that looks essentially like this: Name Field1 Field2 John value1 value2 Jane value3 value4 My table is stored as a dataframe. I'd like to efficiently produce an

Hello, I wanted to parse some information from a text, where fields are tab separated. When I copy the text into an R session (under emacs) like: mystring <- "field1 field2 field3" the tab character is replaced by a single space! For ex, if I type mystring, I get: "field1 field2 field3" The tabs have disappeared!!! I checked with Python that the text I copied was tab

Greetings, How to write Example which will check if model''s variable''s format is valid using :on => :create, like this: class User < ActiveRecord::Base ... validates_format_of :email, :with => /.../, :on => :create ... Using following code is not right: it "should ..." do @user = users(:example_user) @user.email =

Hi, I am investigating a poor code generation on x86-64 involving a 64-bits structure with two 32-bits fields (in the attached examples float, but similar behavior is exposed with i32, and we can probably generalize that to smaller types too). The root cause of the problem is in SROA, although I am not sure we should fix something there. That is why I need your advices. ** Problem ** 64-bits

Hi Eli, Thanks for the feedbacks. On Aug 9, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am investigating a poor code generation on x86-64 involving a 64-bits >> structure with two 32-bits fields (in the attached examples float, but

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am investigating a poor code generation on x86-64 involving a 64-bits > structure with two 32-bits fields (in the attached examples float, but > similar behavior is exposed with i32, and we can probably generalize that to > smaller types too). > The root cause of the problem is

Having used JUnit and Test::Unit, I''m quite used to having the ability to insert a failure message, which helps when tests fail. For instance, the example RSpec that is generated for a model class specifies that the model class is valid. Assuming this were supposed to be true, and it failed, I''ve now got to duplicate the code in the test in order to find out why it

Hello everyone, I've been advised to use merge to extract information from two data.frames with a number of common columns, but I cannot get a grasp on how it sorts the result. With sort=FALSE, I would expect it to give the result back sorted exactly as the input was but it seems it is not always the case, especially when there are repeats in the input. For example: > a =

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Related idea.. what if all instructions (not just "invoke") could be > allowed to have an optional "except label ..."? This is the direction that we plan to go, when someone is interested enough to implement it. There are some rough high-level notes about this idea here:

Hi, i like to index most of my model fields, but limit the search only to a (changing) subset of this fields. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

hi all any one know how to create a temporary table and fill it, like: #------------------------------------------------------------ create temporary table test1 select * from test; #------------------------------------------------------------ regards. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.