similar to: Updating a model from a checkbox (noob question)

We''re encountering a failure with Mocha 0.5.6. We had this expectation: game_version.expects(:attributes=).with(:game_file => kind_of(GameFile), :game_id => @game.id) This expectation was passing with 0.5.5, but fails with 0.5.6. I added this test to parameter_matcher_acceptance_test.rb, which passes in 0.5.5 and fails in 0.5.6 def test_should_match_nested_parameters

Can someone point me to a reference or tutorial that shows how to map foreign key relationships in the model? For example given: Users id name email Posts id user_id title How do I associate user_id with users.id in the Post and User models? has_many and belongs_to don''t seem to do it. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I am new to RSpec and BDD. I was wondering if RSpec specifications are a good solution for testing REST webservices (not implemented in Rails). If so, what would be a good way to test something like the API described below? =========== GET http://localhost/workflow text/xml Result: 200 OK <?xml version="1.0"?> <workflows>

Hi, I am new to RSpec and BDD. I was wondering if RSpec specifications are a good solution for testing REST webservices (not implemented in Rails). If so, what would be a good way to test something like the API described below? =========== GET http://localhost/workflow text/xml Result: 200 OK <?xml version="1.0"?> <workflows>

I am running chi-square test of goodness of fit, the observation data was well groupped to observation freq. I assume the data obey the normal distribution N(? ?^2), while ? and ?^2 are unknown. So I use their estimation. Consequently, I calculated out the probabilities and input in vector p >x<-c(6,13,14,27,25,19,10,6) #observation freq>p<-c(0.0505, 0.0874, 0.1533, 0.2088, 0.2088,

On 04/05/2018 08:32 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 20:38 -0400, Ken McDonald via samba wrote: >>> By default, step 4 takes forever to run on large datasets because it >>> uses named entities. My ultimate plan was to use the numeric >>> user/group id's in that step instead of named ones so the Winbind cost >>> is not incurred. Seems for

So both Liu and I made huge messes of find_lock_delalloc_range trying to fix stuff, me first by fixing extent size, then him by fixing something I broke and then me again telling him to fix it a different way. So this is obviously a candidate for some testing. This patch adds a pseudo fs so we can allocate fake inodes for tests that need an inode or pages. Then it addes a bunch of tests to make

On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 20:38 -0400, Ken McDonald via samba wrote: > > > By default, step 4 takes forever to run on large datasets because it > > uses named entities. My ultimate plan was to use the numeric > > user/group id's in that step instead of named ones so the Winbind cost > > is not incurred. Seems for the whole process, the calls to Winbind to > >

Also turns the --selinux option of guestfish, guestmount and virt-rescue into a no-op -- it didn't work before so this is effectively no change. --- builder/builder.ml | 6 ----- customize/customize_main.ml | 5 ---- dib/dib.ml | 6 ----- fish/fish.c | 5 ++-- fish/guestfish.pod | 2 +- fuse/guestmount.c | 5 ++--

Also turns the --selinux option of guestfish, guestmount and virt-rescue into a no-op -- it didn't work before so this is effectively no change. --- builder/builder.ml | 6 ----- customize/customize_main.ml | 5 ---- dib/dib.ml | 6 ----- fish/fish.c | 5 ++-- fish/guestfish.pod | 2 +- fuse/guestmount.c | 5 ++--

What does the method query_all_workers() do? There is no documentation on what this method returns (1.0.1 version). Orion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20080118/9f9b8112/attachment.html

Dear R-help, I'm very sorry to ask 2 questions in a week. I am using the package 'crr' and it does exactly what I need it to when I use the dataset a. However, when I use dataset b I get the following error message: Error in drop(.Call("La_dgesv", a, as.matrix(b), tol, PACKAGE = "base")) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number =

Hi, I run the "Unit testing", Then The "Actionview::Testcase" is failed. i.e i am getting the error as below, 1) Error: test_tablename(ActionView::TestCase): TypeError: wrong argument type Class (expected Module) /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/helpers.rb:76:in `include''

We can use the setfiles(8) command to relabel the guest filesystem, even though we don't have a policy loaded nor SELinux enabled in the appliance kernel. This also deprecates or removes the old and broken SELinux support. This patch isn't quite complete - I would like to add some tests to the new API. I'm posting here to garner early feedback. Rich.

Dear R users: I have been trying to figure out how to include string variables in a for loop to run multiple random forests with little success. The current code returns the following error: Error in trafo(data = data, numeric_trafo = numeric_trafo, factor_trafo = factor_trafo, : data class character is not supported In addition: Warning message: In storage.mode(RET@predict_trafo) <-

v1 -> v2: - Add simple test of the setfiles API. - Use SELinux_relabel module in virt-v2v (instead of touch /.autorelabel). - Small fixes. Rich.

I''m going to be removing hole extents in the near future so I wanted to make a sanity test for btrfs_get_extent to make sure I don''t break anything in the meantime. This patch just puts btrfs_get_extent through its paces by giving it a completely unreasonable mapping to look at and make sure it is giving us back maps that make sense. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik

I am trying to use rgenoud and snow with an external model and file I/O. Unlike the typical application of rgenoud and snow, I need to run an external executable and do pre- and post-processing of input and output files for each parameter set generated by genoud(). I'm hoping that someone can suggest improvements to my approach and a work-around for file I/O problems I've encountered when

This converts more of the tests (basically everything under tests/) to use the test harness, revealing some problems which have subsequently been fixed. Rich.

Seeing a build problem after updating my git tree: $ git remote -v origin git://git.samba.org/samba.git (fetch) origin git://git.samba.org/samba.git (push) $ git pull $ ./configure ... $ make clean WAF_MAKE=1 python ./buildtools/bin/waf build ./buildtools/wafsamba/samba_utils.py:397: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead