similar to: Dynamic Port Forwarding - Connection reset by peer problem

> Winton-- > > Excellent! Absolutely wonderful. > > I'm wondering which apps/encapsulators support 4A? This gets me > around > the DNS leakage problem quite nicely. > > Incidentally, we do need SOCKS5 support -- if for no other > reason, the > fact that there's *operating system* level support in OSX for SOCKS5 > redirection. So

On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Markus Friedl <mfriedl at gmail.com> wrote: > I have an ugly patch for that feature that requires protocol modification. Why does it require a protocol modification? Couldn't the client request regular forwarded-tcpip from the server then decode SOCKS entirely within the client? -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

My desire is to form a connection from my laptop running ubuntu to a SOCKS5 server listed on the Internet. I have read the Ubuntu man page on OpenSSH client program. The description indicates that I have to connect to given host name (assumed to be an ip address?) with optional username. I want the server receive my Internet traffic in SOCKS5 protocol and respond to my computer the requested

Hi All. The discussion about SOCKS5 support set me thinking about how you would test it, and I came up with the attached test. (Again, mostly code stolen from another test, this time forwarding.sh). It requires "connect" [1] but will skip the test if it's not found. -Daz. [1] http://www.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.html -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key

Le mercredi 18 janvier 2017 ? 8:55 +1100, Darren Tucker a ?crit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 07:42:50AM -0800, Ron Frederick wrote: Thank you for your answers. > [...] > > One thing that makes UDP over SOCKS more complicated for SSH is that > > SOCKS normally keeps the UDP packets it forwards as UDPl, just adding > > a small header to each packet. If you want to get the

Hi, has anybody seen a patch that provides socks version 5 support for the dynamic portforwarding feature? I?ve seen thats implemented in ssh.com?s ssh version, but found nothing about openssh. Only thing i found was a patch to provide socks4a. cu sleepi

Le mardi 17 janvier 2017 ? 9:20 +1100, Darren Tucker a ?crit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Romain Vimont <rom at rom1v.com> wrote: > [...] > > As a consequence, in particular, a SOCKS5 server started with "ssh -D" > > cannot proxify UDP packets. > > > > Are there deep reasons why OpenSSH does not implement them (security, or > >

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Ault, James R (CRD) wrote: > I was reading the changelog from version 2.9 that was recently released, and I coudln't help noticing > this item: > > from openssh changelog: > > - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2001/04/17 12:55:04 > [channels.c ssh.c] > undo socks5 and https support since they are not really used and >

On Jan 17, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Romain Vimont <rom at rom1v.com> wrote: > [..] >> So if I understand correctly, making "ssh -D" create a "full" SOCKS5 >> server, including UDP relay?, would require to add a new SSH request >> type (like "relay-udp")? >

Hello, Anyone know socks5 proxy in centOS? For linux I know "delegate" but can not locate rpm package. I am trying to make something like this: client->squid:3128->[socks proxy]:8118->[ssh socks5 proxy]:port- >sshd:22-> -- -- Publicidad http://www.pas-world.com

Hi, Currently, OpenSSH only accepts the SOCKS5 command "CONNECT": <https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/tree/channels.c#n1281> The RFC also specifies the commands "BIND" and "UDP ASSOCIATE": <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1928#section-4> As a consequence, in particular, a SOCKS5 server started with "ssh -D" cannot proxify UDP packets. Are

Hi all, This is a client side only implementation of reversed dynamic (SOCKS) TCP forwarding, which means it is compatible with any existing servers have 'remote forward' capability. To establish such forward, use "ssh -R [BIND_ADDRESS:]PORT ...". The server will listen on that port and address and accept SOCKS traffics. Hope this will be useful for you. There was an

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1383 Summary: Tons of "rcvd too much data win" messages since upgrading to 4.7p1 Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hi all. I was getting something working over socks5 and was trying to figure out why it kept using socks4. It wasn't, it was just a misleading debug message.... Patch applies to either OpenBSD or Portable. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience

On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:56:15PM +0000, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: >> If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote >> machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: >> ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine >> and

Hello list, I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even with configured (socks5) proxy which fails behind restrictive firewalls. Is there any "workaround"? Thanks in advance! Regards Uwe -------------- n?chster Teil -------------- Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt... URL:

I love SSH's ability to dynamically forward ports using SOCKS (either -D or DynamicForward) (ie "ssh -D 1081 private.mine.net"). But the thing that has caused me some pain, is that only SOCKS4 is supported. The SOCKS4 proxy specification does not permit hostnames, but only IP addresses. This isn't much of a problem if the target host is a public Internet host or otherwise DNS

Hello, I'm running Wine 0.9.10 on a Fedora Core 5 at work. I'd like to use the Socks5 proxy we've got with application run under Wine. The application I'm using in Wine works fine using direct connection to the internet but this application has no settings I can change to inform it of the socks proxy. So I'm using Sockscap32 2.38 from www.permeo.com . It works fine under

I have a linux server with 3 public IPs, and I use SSH tunnelling to connect to each of them. Let's call them: 1.1.1.1 (venet0:0), 1.1.1.2 (venet0:1), 1.1.1.3 (venet0:2). When I tunnel using 1.1.1.1, outgoing IP for the public is: 1.1.1.1. But when I tunnel using 1.1.1.2 or 1.1.1.3, the outgoing IP for the public is still 1.1.1.1. I've been googling for days, and tried relevant channels