similar to: Restrict commands available in an SFTP session

Dear folks. I am using smbclient 4.2.10 version (the one packaged for OEL 6, samba4-client-4.2.10-15.el6.x86_64), and observing a weird behaviour of the tool. I've got a Linux local directorio, say /tmp/eraseme, with a couple of subdirectories in it, say a and b, each one containing a dummy file, say a/AM.xls and b/AT.xls If I run: smbclient -d 30 -l /var/log/samba -m SMB3 -W

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 ------- Additional Comments From jason at rndpkt.org 2002-03-28 15:26 ------- mget and mput are just "aliased" commands to get and put, I'm assuming for some kind of compatability. mget and mput expect the get and put parameters and DO NOT function like FTP-based mget and mput (i.e. mget file1 file2.. file#). I'd be happy

Dear fellows. Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V Version 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}" Try "help" to get a list of

A couple of notes about mget/mput in SFTP (5.1p1). 1. They aren't documented in the SFTP man page 2 They misbehave -- "mput a.txt b.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput *.txt b.txt" copies the first wildcard match to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt b.txt c.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt

A new update. Same behaviour with 4.6.16. Exact issue as Bug 1249. Many thanks. Kind regards. El lun., 24 ago. 2020 a las 12:23, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear folks. > > Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 > and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 > distribution is not the most up to date

Dear all. I would like to propose a possible way to make mget and mput behave more or less the same way, rather that just changing documentation. Please, bear in mind this is a poor attempt coming from a person with no C skills at all, so other than testing that only filtered files are transferred, I have not gone further. Hope at least to have been able not to corrupt any pointer, but I'm

Dear Andrew. You are right, I should have taken a deeper look into the standard output during compilation. I did just assume source4 was the one for Samba4. Anyway, besides the source confusion (really, even if I had found the right one, following the code would have been out of my reach), I don't seem to find how that is related with the documentation issue, or the mput/mask/recurse

Samba 2.0.7 running on Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.0A with latest tru64 patches. "mget *" works OK, "mput *" or something like "mput *.bat" fails with the error message "find: bad option -maxdepth". Several questions - Anyone else come across this one? Would dropping back to 2.0.6 fix the problem? Could it be an issue with 2.0.7 on Tru64 V5? Regards, Brian

Things consider problems with sftp software - sftp manually first time to accept the fingerprint and anytime software is updated on host. - no ascii mode only binary - no verbose or indication of bytes transfered (you would do an ls after sftp is done) - no mput or mget (this may be a show stopper) but could script could generate itself with all the filenames takes coding. Kenneth

HI , I setup vsftp yesterday as a local user only mode. No anonymous was enabled. I set up this vsftpd on my machine running CentOS 4.4. its ip is 192.168.101.25. so when I login as ftp://192.168.101.25/ via web browser, I am promted the username as password. After inputing username and password, I can login successfully. Then I can download everything as usual. But I can not upload any data ?

Dear Jeremy. Really appreciate you took your time to answer. I had already reviewed source4/client/client.c looking for mput (cmd_mput) command, but unluckily saying that my C programming skills are poor woud be really overrating them. I'm sorry to disagree for two reasons 1-. It works for mget, true that the source code is completely different. 2-. If taking a look into smbclient man

Hi All, I'm an Amiga user of samba. All is well with server and client except recursive mput within smbclient. It transfers nothing, and reports no errors. Can anyone help? My samba version is 1.9.16p9. More detail: I started with BIN: pointing to amitcp:samba/bin in which I placed sh, as recommended. I found without recurs set that mput #? (or mput *) reported that it could not find ls

Hi everybody, I failed to make Samba 3.0.0 /3.0.2a working from Windows side on the slightly different Slackware?s. Last try was the ?current? Slackware version(kernel 2.4.25) of some March 20?s with Samba 3.0.2a in it. Server: Asus P4P800-PIV?RAM 1.5(1)Gb- 3Com 3C940 integrated. Client(s): W2k SP3, Realtek 8139 NIC. Installed OK (binaries from a distribution?), user added OK after

Dear folks. Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 distribution is not the most up to date version I should test this on, as it also limits how easy is compiling most recent versions of Samba, but I assume though this is not a tricky test, and should work as documented in both 4.4 and 4.2

Dear Rowland. So sorry, I did not get the responses to this e-mail address, got them by the purest change googling again. I'm sorry to disagree with your approach: 1-. In my most recent updates you should have seen I am compiling Samba4 from source. Began with packaged distribution, but considering it might be a bug, I decided to test myself. 4 different versions, same behaviour. This means

Dear all. Confirmed: compilation of 4.12.6 produces same result, mput + recurse ignores mask for files. Will you please tell me if you need further details, or which steps I should follow? Should I file a bug? Many thanks. Best regards. El mar., 25 ago. 2020 a las 9:52, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear Andrew. > > You are right, I should have taken a deeper look

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 Summary: Undocumented mget and mput in sftp Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: sftp AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: Maldoror at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:15:48PM +0200, LPC DPG via samba wrote: > Dear fellows. > > Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V > Version 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient

I'm trying to get a recursive file listing with smbclient: smbclient //host/share -Uusername%password -c "ls -alFR" But I get an error: NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE listing \-alFR Evidently, smbclient thinks I'm asking for a file mask. Is there a way to get a recursive file listing on a samba share so I can pipe it to wc -l for a file count? Ideally, I'd like to: (This won't