similar to: ssh -vvv doesn't show the username anywhere

I am getting this error after installing puppet with gem $ gem install puppet Fetching: facter-1.6.14.gem (100%) Fetching: puppet-3.0.1.gem (100%) Successfully installed facter-1.6.14 Successfully installed puppet-3.0.1 2 gems installed Installing ri documentation for facter-1.6.14... Installing ri documentation for puppet-3.0.1... Installing RDoc documentation for facter-1.6.14... Installing

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote: > >> A STATEFUL firewall with ?ip any any? can and will still block asymmetric >> communications due to the firewall keeping track of state (hence tha name >> stateful firewall). >> >>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan <at> ochtman.nl> writes: > > > > As far as I understand, this change is wanted because the LLVM > > infrastructure derives no value from knowing the types, and there's a > > cost in terms of code spent to support all of it.

Hi there, Sorry, I don't have the thread history to reply to since I normally read llvmdev through the archives, but wanted to give my .02 of feedback anyway. As far as I understand, this change is wanted because the LLVM infrastructure derives no value from knowing the types, and there's a cost in terms of code spent to support all of it. I've been creating a frontend that mostly

Hi how do I tell with user type to use userdel with -r short of using exec type? i have a user account called `foo'' so i created a test puppet file local to the system called test.pp # cat test.pp user {"foo": ensure => absent, managehome => true, } when I apply it on solaris or linux the userdel does not use the `-r'' switch

How do I find out why df -k is taking soo long to respond only sometimes? -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

In my puppet client I have puppet.conf defined puppet server as mypuppet server = mypuppet.example.net Not sure why the puppet client puppet-test is still sending these noises to the syslog Jun 10 13:36:23 puppet-test puppetd[10863]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Could not find server : getaddrinfo: node name or service name not known Jun 10 13:36:23 puppet-test puppetd[10863]: [ID 702911

Hi All, Is there a ubuntu repository managed by puppetlabs? I am using lucid and latest puppet package it offers is 0.25.4. I could of course just download source, or a deb from debian or newer ubuntu, or get it using gem. But would be nice if there is a PPA available for lucid, cuz it would work nicely with routine upgrade. puppetdashboard worked nicely with the puppet labs ppa deb

A STATEFUL firewall with ?ip any any? can and will still block asymmetric communications due to the firewall keeping track of state (hence tha name stateful firewall). Tcpdump on your servers /other/ NICs and you?ll see the tftp traffic leaving your server on some other NIC (probably on with the default route). The upstream firewall will then block the tftp response if it never saw the tftp

Hi I looked at few emails related to this subject. And still not sure how to solve the loop detect problem for my case iqbala at improvise:/etc/asterisk$ cat sip.conf [general] context=line1 [phone] type=friend context=phone1 secret=g00dpazzwerd bindport=5060 host=192.168.1.106 dtmfmode=rfc2833 [line] type=friend context=line1 secret=anothers33cret bindport=5061 host=192.168.1.106

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:16 PM Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > It is not respoding to A server which is sending the tftp read request > RRQ. > > > > I do see the RRQ packets coming from A to S, but S never responds back > from > > a different port Y to A

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > One project I'd like to complete pretty soon is to go through the build > instructions, for mingw32, and see if I can't somehow create a mingw64 > build.  I believe the 32-bit platform is dying by the hour so I'm rather > eager to have a mingw64 version of LLVM/Clang.  Also, I'd love

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > I think it makes sense to create a bug report. Looking at the code of > LLParser::ParseGetElementPtr, the error handling appears to be very > simplistic, so I don't think there's any fundamental reason for not > doing a better job there. Filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14965,

I have a tftpd server S running on centos 7 and managed by systemd It is not respoding to A server which is sending the tftp read request RRQ. I do see the RRQ packets coming from A to S, but S never responds back from a different port Y to A So this part is working fine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivial_File_Transfer_Protocol#/media/File:Tftp-rrq.svg But I do not see any attempts to

# cat iddmi.pp class iddmi { # define pkg variable $pkg = $hardwareisa ? { "sparc" => "Iddmi_SunOS_sparc.pkg", "i386" => "Iddmi_SunOS_i386.pkg", default => undef, } $ftpsystems = "ftp.example.net/download" # define path deafult for exec Exec { path =>

Hi I am failing to start apache2 with ruby enterprise edition and passenger 2.2.5 [Wed Sep 09 17:38:20 2009] [notice] Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu) mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8g Phusion_Passenger/2.2.5 configured -- resuming normal operations *** Exception LoadError in PhusionPassenger::Rack::ApplicationSpawner (no such file to load -- puppet) (process 16544): from

I do not see /dev/sd* for this USB Jun 27 17:53:54 host.example.net kernel: : usb 4-9: new high speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd Jun 27 17:53:54 host.example.net kernel: : usb 4-9: New USB device found, idVendor=0781, idProduct=5567 Jun 27 17:53:54 host.example.net kernel: : usb 4-9: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 Jun 27 17:53:54 host.example.net kernel: : usb

I downloaded the puppet-dashboard.git from http://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet-dashboard and did the installation in my ubuntu lucid puppet server following the steps in "Installation". Now I can run it fine using the WEBrick like this root@sys-ubuntu { ~/git/puppet-dashboard }$ ./script/server -e production => Booting WEBrick => Rails 2.3.5 application starting on

I am getting all these messages when run `passenger-status''. Do I need to worry about this? I am using passenger 2.2.2 with puppet 0.24.8 and apache2 on ubuntu 9.04. I installed it using the wiki http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingPassenger Thread ''Main thread'': in ''int Server::start()'' (ApplicationPoolServerExecutable.cpp:553)

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote: > Reading back through prior emails. . . TFTP client requests packets *are* > making it to the TFTP server. So it seems like something on the TFTP server > itself. > Right. I am not sure how to debug that > > Like previously mentioned server side > firewall/iptables/tcp-wrappers/selinux are