similar to: OpenSSH GSoC Project

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-06-04 23:28

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882 Summary: Scp cannot copy self-referring directories Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Red Cricket wrote: > I have had this in my .bashrc for years: > > alias scp='rsync -avzP' Similar, though I named it rcp because nobody has the real rcp installed any more, but sometimes I need scp to connect to systems that lack rsync. https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=shellsnippets/shellsnippets.git;a=blob;f=mksh/rcp;hb=HEAD >

Why is there an inconsistency with the option for the destionation port. ssh -p <port> ... scp -P <port> ... sftp -P <port> ... For scp it is neccessary to be "-P" ( Quote: " Note that this option is written with a capital 'P', because $B!](Bp is already reserved for preserving the times and modes of the file in rcp(1)." ). Also sftp uses already

Hello, For some time now, our users have been encountering a problem when using scp to overwrite files on our mass-storage system, which uses SGI's DMF product. I don't have any data as to whether or not any other HSMs would be similarly affected. The scenario is that a user is overwriting a file (via scp) that has previously been migrated to tape. The scp opens the file for writing, but

Why can the local and remote paths be sanitized? Regards, Uri > On Jul 31, 2020, at 19:57, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at gmail.com> wrote: > > ?I wanted to bring this up again due to: > https://github.com/cpandya2909/CVE-2020-15778/. This showcases a clear > issue with scp which it sounds like cannot be fixed without breaking scp. > This seems like it would lend some impetus

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=801 Summary: Improve usability of scp by adding a "make path" option Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 08:06 +0200, Markus Friedl wrote: > I had something in mind like this for years, but with slightly > different steps: > My naive approach would be to keep the scp user interface and switch > to the sftp protocol internally. We could add a -M [scp|sftp] option > to scp and select the internal protocol. Later we switch the default > from scp to sftp. > No

IF ssh is a replacement for rlogin,rsh etc I can accept it respecting rlogin=false as rlogin does and rsh does not, however scp is a replacement for rcp, and rcp does NOT use rlogin attribute, so the implementation is NOT standard as scp fails if rlogin=false, but rcp succeeds, as documented. thanks mark

I spent some time debugging a failing Scp that turned out to be caused by the remote shell producing messages on Standard Output that aren't part of the SCP protocol. Scp from a remote system works by running another Scp on the remote system. The remote Scp writes SCP protocol messages (and file data) to its Standard Output, which the local Scp sees as Standard Input. But it's

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 ------- Additional Comments From liug at mama.indstate.edu 2002-05-18 07:14 ------- I tried several different versions of openssh, and got the same problem with scp. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hi, Is there some know problem between the 'scp' client in OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 and F-Secure's SSH 2.4.0 server? The client is running on a Linux (2.2.17) box and server is running on Win2K. When I try to transfer files it asks me for the password (which I provide) then it hangs. Using 'scp -v' didn't provide any helpful info; it's as though the problem happened before

Hey, So, I would be looking at type A. Forgive me if my understanding of how OpenSSH operates is not reflective of reality. I am assuming that, the file transfer is happening somewhat logically, with a name being known, content written, blah blah. >From reading scp.c, it appears that, the client end at least knows the file name so I must assume the server end must be given it. I am hoping to

This bug (Debian bug number 111692) occurs with filenames that have the character 0x0a in them (newline). This is how one repeats it: ming.empire.pick.ucam.org:~/ssh-test/ # [01/09/10.00:15:50] $ : bash[592] ; cat > 'x x' This is a test. ming.empire.pick.ucam.org:~/ssh-test/ # [01/09/10.00:16:17] $ : bash[593] ; scp 'x x' dorothee:ssh-test/

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-01-31 23:01 ------- this is an installation error on the target host, see: scp: warning: Executing scp1 compatibility. scp: FATAL: Executing ssh1 in compatibility mode failed (Check that scp1 is in your PATH). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee

I was wondering why scp didn't have a restart-in-the-middle option when transferring a large file. Isn't that something that is supported by the underlying ssh protocol? Is there some other program that can give me this functionality ?

As of Sunday evening, OpenSSH has an interactive sftp client. It should be in the more recent snapshots. It would be appreciated if you could test new client and find all the bugs :) Please also have a read of the manpage and ensure that it matches what is implemented. I am working on fixing the ones that I know about, so please try to stay up to date with the snapshots. Thanks, Damien

Hi, I use rsync with ssh. My question is: how can rsync work only with ssh without scp o sftp? I have installed only rsync and ssh on my windows machine. Is the scp or sftp integrated within rsync? Why rsync need a shell? For login? Thanks in advance. Please respond to my email address too: mail@davideonline.it

Hi, A couple of days ago I realized that 'scp' on the client-side requires 'scp' on the server-side as well. client:scp -> server:sshd -> server:scp It this really the way it should be? IMHO it seems like a bad design. I usually create a Solaris-package with prngd, sshd, ssh-keygen and name it OpenSSH-3.x.x-serveronly but now I have to also include 'scp'. Is it

I have not been able to get scp(1) to download a file with a newline in its name. I know that scp(1) requires that remote filenames be escaped for the shell, but that leads to protocol errors. I am also unable to get sftp(1) to handle such files. It fails with an ?unterminated quoted argument? error, no matter how I try to quote the newline. Furthermore, the SFTP CLI is not well-suited to