similar to: [Bug 566] New: Snapshot does not contain any file

# iptables -m connlimit --help ......... connlimit v1.3.5 options: [!] --connlimit-above n match if the number of existing tcp connections is (not) above n --connlimit-mask n group hosts using mask ----------------------------------------- The library seems to exist also: /lib64/iptables/libipt_connlimit.so However, creating a rule that uses connlimit fails: #$IPTABLES -A

Greetings folks, I've been researching the various iptables modules that are included with the stock CentOS4 distro; particularly the connlimit module. Is connlimit included by default? I thought it is since performing # iptables -m connlimit --help returns information on connlimit usage along with the general iptables help info: <SNIP> connlimit v1.2.11 options: [!]

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-04-28 08:25 ------- The misnomer is true. I

--3Y2Mr1SP1gWKl0+e Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="j9XQ5cF5hebrmXqw" Content-Disposition: inline --j9XQ5cF5hebrmXqw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.10 1.2.10 is (like most other 1.2.x releases) a maintainance release,

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 Summary: ip6tables connlimit - cannot set CIDR greater than 32 (includes fix) Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: laforge

--5uhzMJlTksuFv+PE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9A1A73/U17WN0PFw" Content-Disposition: inline --9A1A73/U17WN0PFw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.9 1.2.9 is (like most other 1.2.x releases) a maintainance release,

--va9XEZk9/dJ5GUjX Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="vM12nk/63StVgfqY" Content-Disposition: inline --vM12nk/63StVgfqY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.9rc1 Version 1.2.9rc1 is the first release candidate of the upcoming 1.2.9

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 beo@sgs.o.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |beo@sgs.o.se Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610 Summary: conntrack doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: urykhy at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 08:39 ------- what patches from patch-o-matic do you use? Do you know how to reproduce this behaviour? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

hi, i try use iptables connlimit, # iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 --connlimit-mask 24 -j DROP iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 where is problem ? thanks # rpm -qa | grep iptables iptables-1.3.5-4.el5 # uname -a Linux test 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Sat Jun 21 19:04:27 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=515 Summary: connlimit filter doesn't work in 1.3.5 version of iptables Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libiptc AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 11:00 ------- what kernel are you running? which patches (from patch-o-matic) did you apply? please give us some more information :) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618 Summary: connlimit doesn't work after upgrade to iptables 1.4.5 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Summary: Incorrection in connlimit's man page Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://svn.netfilter.org/cgi- bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/iptables/extensions/libipt_connlim it.man?rev=3816&view=markup

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 Summary: ipt_account reports: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2063 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bowles@ambisys.com Component|unknown |ip_tables (kernel) OS/Version|other

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 10:55 ------- This looks strange. The BUG in slab.c tells us that there is a GFP_ATOMIC missing. This means that we are allocating kernel memory from softirq context with only GFP_KERNEL. If I understand your backtrace correctly, what happens is: - you are

--KMIs29sPfC/9Gbii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good news, Everyone! (TM) The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter patch-o-matic suite: patch-o-matic-20030107 This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20 the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux