similar to: [Bug 577] New: cannot set spi/reqid numbers higher than 0x7fffffff (policy match)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[Bug 577] New: cannot set spi/reqid numbers higher than 0x7fffffff (policy match)"

2006 Nov 21
2
One bug in the SVN and rtp wrapper issue
Hi Jean-Marc and All, Two things need your confirmation/suggestion. 1) First, I think there is a bug in libspeex/lsp.c line 512. /* hard limit ak's to +/- 32767 */ if (a < -32767) a =32767; // This line should be changed to if (a < -32767) a = -32767; if (a > 32767) a = 32767; ak[j-1] = (short)a; 2) About the RTP wrapper for VoIP I'd like to use the
2006 Nov 21
2
Re: One bug in the SVN and rtp wrapper issue
In a word, I don't what's the standard of speex payload format. The file doc/rtp.txt is for what? Is it not for rtp payload? I find that rtp.txt is more detail that draft02.txt Which rtp docment should be followed? Anyone else has written the RTP wrapper already? Lianghu On 11/22/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) First, I think there is
2006 Nov 21
2
Re: One bug in the SVN and rtp wrapper issue
if the new draft in the manual is used. I don't find how to tell the decoder which mode(NB/WB/UWB) is used in the encoder. The RTP header don't contain the mode field and I don't find the mode information in the coded frame either. Does this mean we have to use NB decoder in all cases? Lianghu On 11/22/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > >
2009 Feb 16
0
ipsec net-to-net problem
I am trying to set up an ipsec net-to-net VPN and am having problems. Here is a diagram of the setup: LAN A --> Host A ----> Internet <---- Host B <-- LAN B LAN A = 10.10.2.0/24 LAN A gateway = 10.10.2.254 Host A internal = 10.10.2.254 Host A external = xx.xx.xx.xx Host B external (see below) Host B internal = 10.10.1.10 LAN B = 10.10.1.0/24 LAN B gateway = 10.10.1.252 (F5 Big
2017 Oct 11
1
How can I disable at-spi-bus-launcher
I have a laptop that hangs up on shutdown saying that at-spi-bus-launcher is still running. Since I have no use for at-spi-bus-launcher anyway, I would like to get rid of it, but attempting to remove the at-spi2-core rpm wants to remove 99% of my desktop as well. The only way that I can see to get rid of it is to make /usr/libexec/at-spi-bus-launcher non-executable, but that's a pretty
2007 Sep 03
3
Shorewall + IPSec: help debugging why gw1<->gw2 SA works, but loc<->gw2 traffic doesn't trigger SA
Dear list, I''m running Shorewall on a dedicated Fedora 7 box. Shorewall is working well as an office DSL router (dynamic IP) with loc and dmz zones. I am now trying to configure IPSec to connect a VPS, "casp", with a static IP to both the firewall and to the loc network behind it. The host to host SA works fine. However, pings from "loc" to "casp" can be
2019 May 16
2
CTDB node stucks in " ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not listening on TCP port 445"
Hi everybody, I just updated my ctdb node from Samba version 4.9.4-SerNet-Debian-11.stretch to Samba version 4.9.8-SerNet-Debian-13.stretch. After restarting the sernet-samba-ctdbd service the node doesn't come back and remains in state "UNHEALTHY". I can find that in the syslog: May 16 11:25:40 ctdb-lbn1 ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not listening on TCP port 445 May 16
2004 Aug 16
2
Re: [Shorewall-announce] Shorewall 2.1.4
Magnus Hyllander wrote: > > I guess what I''m wondering is, how does Shorewall (netfilter) know which > zone a certain road warrior belongs to? I''ve just completed getting dynamic zones working with ipsec again. A dynamic IPSEC zone is defined in /etc/shorewall/zones by following the short name (first column) with ":ipsec". The code is in CVS. There are a
2004 Aug 28
0
Shorewall 2.1.7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In this release: 1) Dynamic Ipsec Zones now work. 2) Output Traffic Accounting by user/group is supported (thanks to Tuomas Jormola). 3) The following negative test options are added in /etc/shorewall/ipsec and /etc/shorewall/masq: reqid!=<number> spi!=<number> proto!=esp|ah|ipcomp mode!=tunnel|transport
2005 Apr 27
5
26sec kame ipsec tunnel : packets leave unencrypted...
Hi everyone, First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking. My problem: I want to setup a tunnel for the following
2004 Dec 08
9
Kernel/iptables question
As suggested here: http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2004-October/015097.html I''ve run: adam@shrike:~$ /sbin/iptables -m policy --help iptables v1.2.11 Usage: iptables -[AD] chain rule-specification [options] iptables -[RI] chain rulenum rule-specification [options] iptables -D chain rulenum [options] --snip-- And: adam@shrike:~$ sudo
2006 Nov 21
0
Re: One bug in the SVN and rtp wrapper issue
> 1) First, I think there is a bug in libspeex/lsp.c line 512. > > /* hard limit ak's to +/- 32767 */ > if (a < -32767) a =32767; // This line should be changed to if > (a < -32767) a = -32767; > if (a > 32767) a = 32767; > ak[j-1] = (short)a; Oops. Thanks for pointing that out. It's fixed in svn. > 2) About the RTP wrapper for VoIP
2006 Nov 21
0
Re: One bug in the SVN and rtp wrapper issue
lianghu xu wrote: > In a word, I don't what's the standard of speex payload format. > The file doc/rtp.txt is for what? Is it not for rtp payload? > I find that rtp.txt is more detail that draft02.txt > > Which rtp docment should be followed? > Anyone else has written the RTP wrapper already? Oh, I see. doc/rtp.txt was a very, very early draft. See the manual for a
2006 Nov 21
0
Re: One bug in the SVN and rtp wrapper issue
There's a field in the SDP description for narrowband/wideband/ultrawideband. Jean-Marc lianghu xu wrote: > if the new draft in the manual is used. I don't find how to tell the > decoder which mode(NB/WB/UWB) is used > in the encoder. The RTP header don't contain the mode field and I don't > find the mode information in the > coded frame either. > >
2006 Oct 31
0
PSARC 2006/214 Crypto Framework random number API/SPI update
Author: mcpowers Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 96cccf53906cb9bb5a733b8ca426f5f511392252 Log message: PSARC 2006/214 Crypto Framework random number API/SPI update 6374503 C_SeedRandom is too slow causing poor performance with Apache/OpenSSL when using pkcs11 Files: update: usr/src/lib/pkcs11/libpkcs11/common/metaGeneral.c update: usr/src/lib/pkcs11/libpkcs11/common/metaGlobal.h
2017 Feb 20
1
Re: Fwd: nbdkit async
The concern is a client is blocked while processing a request. The nbdkit server design requires a thread per request being processed regardless of the number of connections or clients. We want to run 1000's of requests in parallel without needing a thread at nbdkit layer per request in flight. Our plugin layer is built around boost asio and a few threads in a worker pool running an io
2012 Oct 23
0
SPI using Nonparametric Approach
Dear r-users, Any such a way that we can compute SPI using kernel function (nonparametric approach) without assuming any parametric distributions? Any existing package for above method using R? Thank you for your help. Fayyad [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2014 Jul 03
0
ctdb split brain nodes doesn't see each other
Hi, I?ve setup a simple ctdb cluster. Actually copied the config file from an existing system. Thats what happens: Node 1, alone Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 10.0.0.1 OK (THIS NODE) pnn:1 10.0.0.2 DISCONNECTED|UNHEALTHY|INACTIVE Generation:1369816268 Size:1 hash:0 lmaster:0 Recovery mode:NORMAL (0) Recovery master:0 Node1, after start of ctdb on Node 2 Number of nodes:2 pnn:0
2014 Feb 26
0
CTDB Debug Help
Hello, I've got a two node CTDB/Samba cluster that I'm having trouble with trying to add back a node after having to do an OS reload on it. The servers are running CTDB 2.5.1 and Samba 4.1.4 on AIX 7.1 TL2. The Samba CTDB databases and Samba service work fine from the node that was not reloaded. The rebuilt node is failing to re-add itself to the cluster. I'm looking for
2008 Sep 08
1
correct lme syntax for this problem?
Hello all, I am about to send off a manuscript and, although I am fairly confident I have used the lme function correctly, I want to be 100% sure. Could some kind soul out there put my mind at ease? I am simply interested in whether a predictor (SPI) is related to height. However, there are five different populations, and each may differ in mean level of height as well as the relationship