similar to: [Bug 588] New: make ipv6 optional in iptables

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[Bug 588] New: make ipv6 optional in iptables"

2013 Aug 09
1
Why libnetfilter_queue is missing from CentOS, but available in, Fedora?
I am asking this on behalf of the HIPL developers; http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ https://launchpad.net/hipl They have been working on getting their code consistant to the new libnetfilter architecture. Finally have Fedora 18 and 19 available, but have hit a stumbling block with Centos 6. They tell me they are not finding libnetfilter_queue. Here is their message to me: On 08/08/2013 02:03 PM,
2006 Jan 03
3
ip_queue module issue
Hi All, I am adding ip_queue module for snort inline IDS. I am using snort2.4.0 And iptables-1.3.4. Userspace Queuing(queue target) is enabled. It is built-in and not built as a module. The output of /proc/net/ip_queue is shown below: cat /proc/net/ip_queue> Peer PID : 0 Copy mode : 0 Copy range : 0 Queue length : 0 Queue max. length : 1024 IPTABLES 1.3.4 is
2011 Nov 05
1
[LLVMdev] Patch to enable LLVM to build successfully with shared library support disabled
I checked out llvm/trunk today and found that it failed to build successfully on Linux when 'configure' was invoked with '--disable-shared' and CFLAGS included '-static'. The attached patch modifies a few Makefiles to prevent attempts to build shared libraries when ENABLE_SHARED is not set to 1. Apply the patch in the LLVM root directory with 'patch -p1 ...'
2008 Aug 13
1
support libipq?
I am thinking of trying centos (I am now using Fedora). Does centos support libipq? Thanks, Mike.
2009 Jun 08
1
problem compiling ctdb
Hello , I am trying to compile ctdb. I pull latest version 2-Jun-2009. During make it fails with error: Compiling utils/ipmux/ipmux.c In file included from /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h:10, from /usr/include/libipq.h:37, from utils/ipmux/ipmux.c:31: /usr/include/linux/if.h:59: error: redefinition of `struct ifmap' /usr/include/linux/if.h:77:
2010 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] [diff] let llvm-shlib build on OpenBSD
Hi, llvmdev! The diff attached takes the features of OpenBSD binutils into account (which needs --whole-archive) and makes build with ENABLE_SHARED successful. -------------- next part -------------- Index: tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile =================================================================== --- tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile (revision 117443) +++ tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile (working copy) @@
2010 Mar 12
1
[PATCH 3/3] libdrm: Move all noninstalled headers to noinst_HEADERS.
Cleanup make system so that all noninstalled headers are put to noinst_HEADERS. This quarentees that header will be present in tar ball but not installed with make install. CC: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Pauli Nieminen <suokkos at gmail.com> --- Makefile.am | 6 +++--- intel/Makefile.am | 10 ++++++---- nouveau/Makefile.am | 4 +++- 3 files changed,
2010 Aug 23
2
Slow domain resolution problem
Hi everyone, I've just joine the list as I am having an issue with our CentOS servers. The domain resolution is extremely slow from the application but doing an nslookup gives an immediate response. All the applications have the same issue, as do all the servers. I have been looking for the solution all over the web and all I have found are references to disabling ipv6. - By setting
2010 Sep 06
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: change build order (or location) of LLVMHello plugin
Good evening, Michael. 2010/9/5 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>: > Do you know what the exact problem is? It would be best to fix the > Makefile instead of moving it. And sense it is a transformation, the > build system is broken if you _have_ to move it. I am sorry, I don't understand what *the exact problem" is. I can describe facts; - Hello is the only
2005 Feb 16
5
Compiling sch_tbf.c in user space
Hi, I am new to kernel programming. My task is to route packets from different hosts through one single token bucket filter as we are trying to model a wireless scenario with many hosts communicating and sharing the same bandwidth.So the idea we came up with was to route packets from different hosts to user space using Netfilter and then send them through a common tbf implemented in user space in
2002 Nov 05
2
2.5.6 release
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote: > On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote: > > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August > > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there > > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for > >
2010 Oct 27
0
[LLVMdev] [diff] let llvm-shlib build on OpenBSD
Vladimir, It is as same as freebsd :) See also http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8434 I will commit them fused tomorrow, if no one objects. ...Takumi 2010/10/27 Vladimir Kirillov <proger at uaoug.org.ua>: > Hi, llvmdev! > > The diff attached takes the features of OpenBSD binutils into account > (which needs --whole-archive) and makes build with ENABLE_SHARED >
2010 Aug 05
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Capability of Win32.DLL with ENABLE_SHARED
Hi Takumi, > Any feedbacks are welcome. > Have fun! This seems to be pretty useful addition to LLVM on windows! And it seems the only painless way to make plugins working, yay! For me the patch looks pretty good. One minor thing: could you please rename SharedDir => SharedLibDir Thanks! -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg
2010 Aug 05
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Capability of Win32.DLL with ENABLE_SHARED
Anton, Thanks for your comment. 2nd patch attached. - s/SharedDir/SharedLibDir/g - move prefix=cyg sunk into if(cygwin or mingw) arigato gozaimasu...Takumi * Additional issues - You may build LLVMHello.dll but I don't modify lib/Transforms/Makefile. Because making LLVMHello.dll requires the library LLVM.dll, but it oughta be on the way to making libs at building
2016 Nov 18
2
Questions about the methods of compilation.
Hi, I have some questions about the compilation of the llvm. First, why the majority of the results of compilation are static library ( *.a files in the $(LLVM_HOME)/Release+Asserts/lib/), Why don't generate dynamic link library (.so files in the directory). The exception is the file libLTO.a and libLTO.so, why the library LTO were generated for static and dynamic both? How to control the
2011 Dec 13
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] utils/unittest: Consistency of gtest and gtest_main libs.
$(llvm-config --libs | tr " " "\n" | grep gtest) returns: -lgtest_main -lgtest instead of non-valid: -lLLVMgtest_main -lLLVMgtest It also fixes: $(ld): cannot find -lLLVMgtest $(ld): cannot find -lLLVMgtest_main --- unittests/Makefile.unittest | 2 +- utils/llvm-build/llvmbuild/componentinfo.py | 4 ++-- utils/llvm-build/llvmbuild/main.py |
2010 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Capability of Win32.DLL with ENABLE_SHARED
Good summer, all! This patch enables ENABLE_SHARED=1 to build DLL based LLVM toolchain. I have checked this on Cygwin-1.5, Cygwin-1.7, mingw(msysgit) and mingw-cross-fedora12. I can separate this patch into some parts; cleanups, adding definitions and adding rules. Any feedbacks are welcome. Have fun! ...Takumi * Pros - reduction of linking time of toolchain. - capability of -load
2007 Oct 12
1
Packet Interception
Hello! In the earlier mail I think I was not clear... Actually the following is my requirements: 1) our requirement is to capture all packets originating/destined to a particular machine. This also includes ping packets to same machine/localhost. i.e. at machine A we want to also capture packets originating from say machine A and destined to machine A (these propably do not go to data link
2005 May 03
2
using tc as a function call
i wrote a C++ program that executes "tc" using the std::system call. this fairly reduces the performance if many tc calls are required. i want to be able to rename tc''s main function to tc_main and pass argv and argc. has someone done something like this? please let me know how i can compile for netem. thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You
2007 Aug 07
1
pkgconfig fix for nut
Dear Stanislav, thanks for your patch. The problem with your "recommended" pkgconfigdir is that in many cases, it does not work. Namely, when ${prefix} is not one of the standard places such as /usr. As I understand it, the whole point of a tool like pkgconfig is to allow other software to automatically detect the install location of NUT, especially when that location is not one of