similar to: MacOS ssh implementations slow

I've been using the macports version of dovecot, which is 1.1.11, on MacOS 10.5.6 $ /opt/local/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail imap Fatal: kevent(EV_ADD, 0) failed: Operation not supported This version is configured --with-ioloop=kqueue The problem seems to be known, if not understood: http://lists.apple.com/archives/Darwin-userlevel/2008/Dec/msg00010.html However, if I use

My system never issues the "dovecot start" command. I do, however, run /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap on port 9xxx. I talk to the server through port 9xxx and through the preauth tunnel. Is this arrangement OK? Are there some things that will only work if "dovecot" is invoked? Thanks, -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development

Dovecot seems to be warning about every volume it's ever seen in the past. Is this normal? Can I make it stop? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 12/4/12 12:33:38.148 PM dovecot[2658]: master: Warning: /Volumes/fs is no longer mounted. See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Mountpoints 12/4/12 12:33:38.148 PM dovecot[2658]: master: Warning: /Volumes/dave is no

Just wanted to make sure this issue was registered separately from the overall confusion I'm exploring in another thread, even though I mention this there too. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost

I just discovered that dovecot supports copying messages via hard-linking. I have a huge mailbox hierarchy of existing messages that I'd prefer to store that way. Is there a simple way to transform non-hard-linked storage to hard-linked? TIA, -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com

I don't know if this was supposed to have changed with dovecot2, but http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS shows fts = squat solr so, since I have the lucene plugin?"fts = lucene" works by itself?I tried fts = squat lucene but: $ doveadm index '*' doveadm(dave): Error: fts: Failed to initialize backend 'squat lucene': Unknown backend So, is that syntax

According to the IMAP spec if I do a search for "TO isocpp.org" it should find all the messages whose To: field contains the string "isocpp.org", but dovecot is returning me an empty list. However, a search for "TO tm at isocpp.org" produces a long list of messages. This behavior is present if I *even load* the lucene fts plugin. Note that lucene isn't in use

Considering two crashing bugs, which have got no response (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3587525&group_id=80013&atid=558446 and https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3592291&group_id=80013&atid=558446) and the lack of activity in its Git repository, I am inclined to think that CLucene's current release series (e.g. 2.3.3.4) should be

Subject says all. Timo, would you write something up where the world will find it? Also, it would be great if doveadm fts was covered in the doveadm manpage. Thanks, -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost

Is this intentional? Closing the connection without warning doesn't seem like the best response... --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- % printf "1 select \"INBOX\"\n2 search body quack\n3 logout\n" | /opt/local/libexec/dovecot/imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY

I noticed that occasionally searching in my huge archive mailbox can be really slow, so I tried doveadm index on it and it seemed to do a lot of work, which seemed strange given, for example, that dovecot-lda says it keeps Dovecot index files up-to-date. Then I thought, "maybe these are different files than the search indices." If so, that's not entirely clear from the docs and

It looks like something is going very wrong here. Any advice? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ doveadm -vvvD index '*' doveadm(dave): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot doveadm(dave): Debug: Module loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib20_fts_plugin.so doveadm(dave): Debug: Module loaded:

I just found this in my logs. Any idea? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 12/4/12 12:33:43.831 PM dovecot[2660]: indexer-worker(dave): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name)) 12/4/12 12:33:43.831 PM dovecot[2660]: indexer-worker(dave): Error: Raw backtrace: 2

For over a year now, I've been trying to acquire the ability to review the thread history of a message in my INBOX while still deleting messages as soon as I believe I'm done with them. Suddenly I'm gratified to see that several approaches have been right under my nose all along! One is the INTHREAD imap extension, which I see is implemented by dovecot. Another (related) is

On Oct 7, 2011, at 1:29 AM, John Wiegley wrote: >>>>>> Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: > >> If we had a larger set of volunteers that could help qualify releases AND >> buildbots to continuously test the new release criteria, then we are willing >> to expand this criteria. We haven't had a lot of volunteers step up in this >> area

>>>>> Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: > If we had a larger set of volunteers that could help qualify releases AND > buildbots to continuously test the new release criteria, then we are willing > to expand this criteria. We haven't had a lot of volunteers step up in this > area though. Just to note, BoostPro has already expressed a willing to run

What host triple should I be using to specifically target x86_64 / Win64? I notice there is no Win64 in the OSType enum, but there is Win32. And yet I know llvm can target Win64, right? -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com

On 5/18/2011 1:47 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On May 17, 2011, at 2:50 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: >> On 5/17/2011 2:58 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> On May 14, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: >>> >>>> Just a heads up that the llvm build appears to be broken on cygwin. I >>>> haven't investigated, but here's the failures:

Hello, I'm trying to find clues on what may have changed for GSSAPI (Kerberos) authentication between OpenSSH 5.1p1 and 5.2p1. We have been using GSSAPI authentication for ssh for about 18 months with no problem with the OpenSSH build that is bundled with the FreeBSD operating system. All of those machines have OpenSSH 5.1p1. Last week I upgraded one of the servers to FreeBSD 8.0-BETA1

On 5/17/2011 2:58 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On May 14, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: > >> Just a heads up that the llvm build appears to be broken on cygwin. I >> haven't investigated, but here's the failures: >> >> llvm[3]: Compiling X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp for Release+Asserts build >>