similar to: Improving Testing Infrastructure using an abstraction driven Framework - GSOC

Hello, I apologize if this isn't the right place to post about the Google Summer of Code; if so, I would appreciate guidance toward the correct list. If this is the correct list, I would appreciate answers to the message below. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Jawaad Ahmad <jawaadahmad32 at webster.edu> To: djm at openssh.com Subject: OpenSSH GSoC Project Date: Thu, 19 Mar

Dear openssh developers and users, I'm new to the list, and my apologies if this question has been asked before. I've tried to look for answers and haven't succeeded, which is why I'm asking. Here's the situation: I'm connect to a dual-stacked host with A and AAAA records. The IPv6 connectivity to the host is broken. When connecting to the host directly from my client

On 04/04/2012 07:08 AM, Charles Davis wrote: > Hi, > > Here's one of my proposals for GSoC 2012. What do you think? > > Chip > > Project Title: Table-Driven Decompilation > > Abstract: > Over the years, the LLVM family has grown to include nearly every type of build tool in existence. One of the few missing is a decompiler. LLVM's TableGen tool could

On 4/4/2012 12:08 AM, Charles Davis wrote: > Proposal: > Since its humble beginnings in 2001, LLVM has grown from a simple compiler toolkit to an entire family of build tools. Currently, it includes an assembler, a disassembler, a JIT, a C compiler, a debugger, an archiver, various tools for analyzing object files, and even a linker. In fact, just about the only tool missing from this set

I finally submitted my student proposal. I'm waiting for Daniel's comments or who may have some interest. http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/landir/t127048637762 -- Lucas da Costa Silva @landir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hey guys,hi.:) I've finished implementing the PL2 scheme . The bounds I have implemented for it are as good as I could, given the nature of the scheme and my mathematical skills.However,tight bounds for other named DFR schemes will be easier to implement because their forumlas are quite simpler compared to PL2 . Will send in a pull request in a couple of days once I'm done with the tests

> > > No we will always have control over where the parent calls the functions that we are recompiling. As explained in the example below > > Original Code > > Binary for A: Binary for B: > > ... ... > ... ... > br B ... > ... ... >

> > > Then we would always have the location of the br B instruction in A, as it is pushed onto the stack or saved in link register when A calls B. > Right, unless you wanted to go with direct calls in the JIT. I don't know that inspecting a running program's stack for return values while compiling on a separate thread is sane :) That said, the adaptive compilation

On Apr 3, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Xin Tong Utoronto wrote: > Another way to do the patching is to first atomically inserted a self-loop jump -2 atomically (jump -2 takes 2 bytes and 2 bytes writing is atomic on x86 ) into the old branch address on x86 such that it stops all threads reaching this point. copy in the new compiled function address. and then re-patch the jump -2 with the correct

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>wrote: > > > > > > No we will always have control over where the parent calls the functions > that we are recompiling. As explained in the example below > > > > Original Code > > > > Binary for A: Binary for B: > > > > ... ...

On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Then we would always have the location of the br B instruction in A, as it is pushed onto the stack or saved in link register when A calls B. >>> >> >> Right, unless you wanted to go with

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Then we would always have the location of the br B instruction in A, as > it is pushed

Hello, I am currently working on LLVM as a placement student for a year and would love to continue to do so after my placement ends. GSoc seems like an excellent opportunity for this. After looking at the open projects page, I would like to propose working on improving coverage reports. http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#coverage Is this project ideal for GSoc and if so, will there be a mentor

I would like to see: (1) LLVM testsuite run every night for all targets, target variants and operating systems, for example by using an emulator to emulate targets for which the hardware is not available. The gcc project has a compile farm which might be usable for this, but we would need to ask them if it is ok. (2) Likewise for the gcc testsuite, with results emailed to the nightly test

hi all, As a part of GSoC 2008 project, I am improving the llvm nightly tester. Now I am in the process of understanding the nightly tester source[1] together with its documentation[2](of course which I am planning to improve). I will ask any thing that need to clarify from the list. Thanks! -Rajika [1] - http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/nightly-test-server/trunk/ [2] -

Hi Everyone, I?m a student in Peking University, China, my name is Xiaobing Liu, I?m interest in Spelling correction project. I think Xapian?s Spelling correction is based on edit distance with trusted dictionary. I have some questions about the spelling correction algorithm. 1. The Spelling correction algorithm depends on which dictionary, the dictionary in inverted index or other

On Apr 3, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > <snip conversation about call patching> It seems to me that there's a general feature here that LLVM is lacking, that would be useful in a number of JIT-compilation contexts, namely the ability to mark certain instructions (direct calls, perhaps branches too) as back-patchable. The thing that stands out to me is that

Hi, Here's one of my proposals for GSoC 2012. What do you think? Chip Project Title: Table-Driven Decompilation Abstract: Over the years, the LLVM family has grown to include nearly every type of build tool in existence. One of the few missing is a decompiler. LLVM's TableGen tool could potentially accelerate development of such a tool; most backends already have the information needed

> Just my two cents. From time to time I'm testing LLVM via > compiling & running such big beasts as Qt and Mozilla. Also, > at 2.0 time I tried to compile & test bunch of software from > KDE and many others. I tried to compile the 3D game engine "darkplaces" with llvm-gcc 4.2, but the produced binary didn't work. However, I didn't find out how debug

While on the subject of the testsuite, some random thoughts: - show how test results changed from one week and one month ago, and compared to the last release, rather than just comparing with the previous run as now. Good for spotting trends. - fix the testsuite so that buildlogs are really available: I occasionally see that a nightly tester failed the build, and in the message it gives a url