similar to: [Bridge] How can start

This command output should be modified " aligned " to fit the text processing tool to can understand what I mean please try to cut the interfaces column with any text processing tool "awk , cut or even python script" but make sure that you have some bridges with some interfaces -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello! Recently,I¡¯m doing a security project based upon ipv6.I have built up a bridge to support a transparent firewall.(my system is Fedora Core 2,kernel 2.6.5).In this system ,the version of the iptables is 1.2.7,which does not support ipv6(I have tried it).Thus,I download a new version and test it. The iptables functions in bridge mode,but the ipv6 doesn't work well.In the

I have read several articles for setting up a network bridge. My configuration is: WorkStation --> Switch0:VLAN1 --> Switch1:VLAN1 --> bridge --> Switch1:VLAN45 --> Laptop I am running CentOS 4.3 on the bridge #> brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.0030843e5aa2 no eth1

Hi, I am a beginner of bridge. I have a problem of using Fedora Core 2 to make a simple bridge. Here is my setup: The bridge computer is installed with Fedore Core 2 (with the SE Linux patch). As I know that kernel 2.6.5 is already support bridging by default, so I didn't recompile the kernel. Then I installed bridge-utils-0.9.6-1.i386. And no additional configuration is made. After

hi, = i have my wireless LAN card connected in USB port of linux machine at eth= 1, = = and another wireless LAN card connected to USB port of windows machine. = = the LAN card of windows has been plugged out. now, i want to access the = = internet sites on windows machine through the wireless LAN b/w the 2 = = machines. = I have successfully made a bridge

Hi @all, I have a strange problem. Here is the setup: I have a bridging linux box with 3 NICs (Intel e1000). 1 NIC (eth0) connected to the internet interface and the other both (eth1 and eth2) are each connected to a different switch in the bridged network. I setup bonding (bond0) with active failover for eth1 and eth2. Then I added eth0 and bond0 to br0 and brought it up with an ip. I am able

Hiyas, Is there a patch for the 2.4.x series to do ip6tables bridging of IPv6 packets? I was unable to go to 2.6 due to issues with large packets so still living in 2.4 land. If there are no patches, any ideas on what gets patched in IPv4 to allow this bridging? -Scott __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

I've got a 2.6.8 kernel with bridging enabled as a module, two nics (LNE100TX and RTL8139) and i've run the following commands with no errors modprobe -v bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 both interfaces have 0.0.0.0 as their addresses and brctl showmacs br0 shows the macs for both internal cards. However, bridging doesn't seem to be working at all.

Is it possible to bridge multiple "tap" interfaces in Linux? When two tap interfaces are bridged together they are unable to "see" each other but they can bridge to external Ethernet interfaces or the hosts IP attached on the bridge. I saw some mention in the mailing list archives on bridging two user space processes but it didn't seem to have any conclusion. I also

Hi, Sorry,after i install bridging 1.4, even after i setup a new bridge to link between wlan0 & eth 0 but it seem lost after pc restart, i have to reset after restart. am i doing wrong in installation or ... Hope get some advice from u all (expert) ===== Ô¸ÄúÓÀÔ¶ÐÒ¸££¬¿ìÀֺͰ²Ïê Happy & Healthy Always ! ^_^ ! ¸öÈËÍøÒ³ Homepage:http://planet.time.net.my/sunwaycity/ceyong ¸öÈË·ðѧÍøÒ³

Hi all, I have got one query on QoS in bridging in Linux My question is, when we define IP QoS ( using a tc command ) queuing discplines and classses, will these be applicable to bridged frames also ? I mean the packets that take IP path will be sent out according to QoS we defined, but the bridged/ swithced packets will also be sent according to this defined IP QoS classses ? My doubt is

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:13:33 +0100 ncrfgs <ncrfgs@tin.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the great 802.1d Ethernet Bridging support via > brctl along with Universal TUN/TAP devices created with > openvpn on a GNU system with a vanilla 2.6.8.1 Linux > kernel. > > > To start it: > > /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br${X} > /sbin/ifconfig brX

The ifreq structure to br_dev_do_ioctl() gives you the interface index (rq->ifr_ifindex) which is currently not being used. May be it can help.. -Kishore >>> David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> 05/19/04 10:30PM >>> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 15:36 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Hmm, since all the blue tooth devices have the same address. > Deleting the first

Hi, I have a PPPoE server running on a linux box that accepts multiple PPPoE sessions from clients. I'd like to bridge each of the sessions together so that it looks like just one interface. Below is a diagram: br0 | ------------------------------- | | | | ppp0 ppp1 eth3 ppp3 I've read that anything can be bridge as long as MTU is the same.

Using Kernel 2.4.25 and bridge-utils64, I still can not get bridging working on the Sparc64 platform. Is anyone interested in helping me figure out what's wrong? If so, what can I do? Would I have better luck using 2.6.X? Any comments would be greatly appreciated. <> Jim

The hardware checksumming flags need to be cleared when forwarding packets. Bridging just needs to forward what ever checksum is in the existing skbuff, it doesn't want or need the packet to be resummed. Without this fix, forwarding between smart/dumb interfaces causes an oops. diff -Nru a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c Mon Sep 8 09:29:44

Hello, I'm trying to use bridging in our servers and found a problem with dhcp. Some clients manage to get an IP from the server, using DHCPDISCOVER/DHCPREQUEST. However others use BOOTREQUEST and these don't seem to get an answer. The server sends a BOOTREPLY but the clients continue to send BOOTREQUEST for ever. There are also some (occasional) messages from the dhcp server like

Hello, I?m using the Linux Bridge on an Atmel Arm9 Plattform with the kernel 2.6.11rc3. The configuration is the following: LAN<--Arm9(Ethernet)--Bridge--Arm9(USB-Device)-->Notebook (USB-Host) or LAN<--Arm9(Ethernet)--Bridge--Arm9(USB-Host)-->Notebook (USB-Host) (with a Trust USB2.0 Host to Host cable) When I try to ping my Notebook from LAN and reverse, everything seems to be

Greetings all, I've setup a new gretap device as per Herbert Xu's new patches and it works as expected for smaller MTU. I'm wondering if gretap tunnels handle fragmentation at all or if this might be a bridge related issue. The same setup works quite well if I use vtun with a tap device however, so while this isn't entirely bridge-related, Maybe someone here might have

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -----= --------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Glacier Bkgrd.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2743 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/200408= 13/40d97dc7/GlacierBkgrd.jpg -------------- next part -------------- Spam detection software, running on the system