similar to: Scaffold a Plural table w/ No Pluralization in environment

If I do: script/generate controller Photo I get a controller named photo_controller. OTOH, if I do: script/generate scaffold Photo I get a controller named photos_controller. (Note that the controller name is pluralized). I realize that I''m specifying the controller name explicitly in the first case, but it seems odd to me that the scaffold command generates a pluralized

I''ve been working through the "Rolling with Ruby on Rails" tutorial and have come up against something I''m hoping someone here can help me understand. In part two of the tutorial, Curt introduces the "ruby script\generate scaffold re -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I''m new to rails after having used perl for most of these things, and am trying to get my head around the generate script for a project playing around with. If I do: ./scripts/generate controller Device I get app/controllers/device_controller.rb where I can then add: scaffold :device However, if I want to actually generate the scaffolding so I can make some changes:

Hi there, I''m puzzled by this apparently simple query I can''t manage to reassemble using ez_where plugin. cond = Caboose::EZ::Condition.new :my_table do start_on < Time.now any {end_on > Time.now; end_on.nil?} end I keep getting the following result : >> cond.to_sql => ["my_table.start_on < ? AND (my_table.end_on > ?)", Tue May 23

...if that is possible My task is to find the longest streak of continuous days a user participated in a game. Instead of writing an sql function, I chose to use the R's rle function, to get the longest streaks and then update my db table with the results. The (attached) dataframe is something like this: day user_id 2008/11/01 2001 2008/11/01 2002 2008/11/01 2003

So, under Sqlite2, if I want to update a database''s schema, I have to dump the DB, modify the table''s structure, then go and modify EVERY insert statement. The insert statements look like (from memory): INSERT INTO my_table VALUES (''some_id'', ''some_val'', '''', '''', '''', ''some_other

Hello, I have a situation where the foreign key into a table doesn''t correspond to that table''s primary key: my_table ------------- id (pk) name ... other_table -------------- id (pk) my_table_name (fk references my_table(name)) ... I want to be able to say something like: class OtherTable < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :my_table, :foreign_key => { :my_table_name

Hi, I''m a complete newbie to this, I''m afraid. Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but I''ve had a look, and can''t find the answers I''m looking for, especially for using Rails 2.0. We have an existing database which we would need to connect Rails to, and the database structure is not what Rails would seem to expect. Firstly, tables are not

Hi, I have a many to many relationship incorporating the following tables: taxes --> taxes_tax_groups --> tax_groups I have a model named tax with the following declaration: has_and_belongs_to_many :tax_groups and I have a model named tax_group with the following declaration: has_and_belongs_to_many :taxes I am attempting to run the following unit test: require

Hi All the tutorials call their controllers ''TodoController''[1] or ''RecipeController''[2] (singular), but "script/generate scaffold Recipe" for example generates a ''RecipesController'' (in recipes_controller.rb) As I''m rather new to RoR I don''t know if that convention changed, I read something about it here:

All, It looks like rake db:schema:dump does not dump primary keys. I have some legacy table that don''t follow the convention ie pk = id and none of the primary keys for these tables are getting dumped... Seems strange as this should be readily available from the db. I am using MySQL. Is anybody else seeing that ? Incidentally how does one specify a primary key using

Adding a column to a table just places the column at the end, but I like to keep related columns together. Is there a way to specify where the column is added in a table with migrations? For example, in MySQL you can do: ALTER TABLE my_table ADD COLUMN new_column INT AFTER other_column I was hoping migrations would support something like this: add_column :my_table, :new_column, :integer,

On Thu, April 16, 2015 10:09 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:01 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> This morning I discovered this in my clamav report from one of our imap servers: >> /usr/share/nmap/scripts/irc-unrealircd-backdoor.nse: >> Unix.Trojan.MSShellcode-21 FOUND >> I have looked at this script and it appears to be

I have not found anything about this except the following from the DBI documentation : Bind variables: the interface is heavily biased towards queries, as opposed > to general > purpose database development. In particular we made no attempt to define > “bind > variables”; this is a mechanism by which the contents of R/S objects are > implicitly > moved to the database during SQL

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1226 Bug ID: 1226 Summary: Segmentation fault when printing a rule checking byte zero of NFT_PAYLOAD_LL_HEADER Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

I''m having trouble with rails and a table named ''dives''. It seems to work fine if I try it with another table name. I''ve generated the scaffold with the script and have not made any modifications to it. When I try to run the dives controller it starts looking for ''dife.rb'' and fives me ''uninitialized constant Dife''. Is this a

When I created a new project and a "equipment" model for an unknown reason to me rails tried to query the table "equipment" and not "equipments", does someone know why it did that ? So I added set_table_name "equipments" in the model class and it now works but I don''t really understand why it is required in the first place... -- Posted via

Hi- Say I have a db with following schema: MyTable: Id, name, user_id, date User: id, name, description I know that I want to add "belongs_to" in my "user" model but how can I enforce a proper constraint on the user_id in "MyTable"? Is this done using a has_one in the "MyTable" model? Thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You

Hi there ! I try to figure out how to do something like this in Rails : SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE name LIKE ''GOGONAM%'' My problem is the % and the quotes. >From now, I do like this : searched_name = params[:name]+''%'' user = MyTable.find(:all, :conditions => ["name LIKE ?", searched_name]) But is there a more gracefull way to do a LIKE

Yesterday, I opened a GitHub Issue<https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/7071> about moving Rails inflections to an initializer. The idea wasn''t received well, understandably, as generating a large initializer with new Rails apps is pretty unappealing. However, the core members seemed open to the discussion of alternatives continuing here. For those of you not in the know,