similar to: Rails+Mongrel+Lighthttpd: Ruby-Sendfile Problem

Hi, On the api doc it is written that if lighttpd is installed, rails will use it as its web server instead of WebBrick. I have installed lighthttpd and verified it works (for example on the default port 80) but when lauching script/server, it still uses WebBrick. I wondering if I need to edit /etc/lighttpd/lighthttpd.conf myself or configure something else. Any idea? Thanks Oscar

I''ve been banging my head against the following for about 8 hours now, and have exhausted my web research options: /usr/home/matthew.feadler/rails/avclfc/public/dispatch.fcgi:21:in `require'': no such file to load -- /usr/home/matthew.feadler/rails/avclfc/public/../config/environment (LoadError) from /usr/home/matthew.feadler/rails/avclfc/public/dispatch.fcgi:21

Hello, I am trying to select the following headers from a data frame but when I try and run the command it executes halfway through and give me an error at V188 and V359. Temp <- data.frame(V4, V5, V6, V7, V8, V9, V10, V11, V12, V13, V14, V15, V16, V17, V18, V19, V20, V21, V22, V23, V24, V25, V26, V27, V28, V29, V30, V31, V32, V33, V34, V35, V36, V37, V38, V39, V40, V41, V42, V43, V44, V45,

I see that lighttpd 1.3.14 supports SCGI. lighttpd 1.3.14 - 2005-06-15 18:10 Changes ------- * added SCGI support via mod_scgi * added hash-based and round-robin load balancing to mod_proxy * fixed range requests larger than 2Gb * fixed compilation on Solaris * fixed endless loops in mod_fastcgi, mod_cgi and mod_proxy * fixed handling of URIs for ''+'' and

Hi, I am just ran into the problem that I cannot access helper methods from within a form_for scope. I do have something like the following: <% form_for :potential_buyer, @potential_buyer, :url => { :action => "register" } do |f| %> <%= render(:partial => ''register_form'', :locals => { :f => f } ) %> <% end %> ----- I cannot

There's another nice Windows program in the pipeline: Feurio 2.0 (www.feurio.de) will have OggVorbis and MonkeyAudio support. Feurio is a all-in-one solution for CD ripping/burning specialized on audio CD. Feurio supports high speed, high-quality on-the-fly ripping and encoding, and on-the-fly decoding/burning, too. Feurio supports allmost all available CD writers, and there is a

In the following deployment of web app on ONE pc-based server,running linux,which can support the most amount of concurrent users as well as the shortest latency? 1 apache+mongrel 2 apache+mongrel_cluster 3 lighthttpd+mongrel 4 lighthttpd+mongrel_cluster 5 lighthttpd+fastcgi Thanks charlie -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all, I've read a bit about fastcgi, and wondered if it might be an interesting solution for e.g. running php in a user-switched environment or running ruby-on-rails etc. But I wonder why nobody (searched on Google) seems to use CentOS with mod_fastcgi for Apache 2.x. And I also wonder why people actually using Apache 2.x and ruby-on-rails with CentOS did run a lighthttpd-fastcgi

Jeremy, I found your old message with this title. I struck the same thing, where the current drive wasn''t the same as the drive I wanted to serve (some) files from. So here''s the patch to add to lib/mongrel/handlers.rb contains class DirHandler. I added two things, first to initialize: def initialize(path, listing_allowed=true, index_html="index.html")

i wrote a little camping app which serves the css, js and images statically using the Static class example i found on the camping wiki. everything works perfectly on my mac. once on windows the static files don''t get served. a 404 is returned. i have tried running the app using camping, webrick and mongrel, all give the same 404 response. here is an example value of X-Sendfile. I have

I have found a package called sendfile that let you send files over network. It installs a prog called sendfile to send and a daemon called sendfiled, called on demand by inetd. I''d like to know if this package is security safe C.Leroy Source can be found at URL: ftp://ftp2.ibp.fr/pub/linux/sunsite/Incoming/sendfile-1.5.tar.gz

Aloha. The current CVS snapshot and 1.0-test14 will not build on Solaris 8 because it does not provide a sendfile() funtion. It just has sendfilev(). Solaris 9 has sendfile(), though. Using the old sendfile-util.c from 1.0-test1 and setting HAVE_SOLARIS_SENDFILEV instead of HAVE_LINUX_SENDFILE in config.h works. Greetings, Andy.

Forwarding this to the main samba list, as this is coming up there. -----Forwarded Message----- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> To: Joern Heusipp <debian-reportbug@cre.inka.de>, 267766@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#267766: samba: incredible slow reads - may be a sendfile problem? Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:28:41 -0700 severity 267766 important thanks I am downgrading this bug

Mates, I'm trying to learn a little more. I have 3.0.7 running on Mandrake 7.2. I could see all the shares, but couldn't access the files "sendfile failed". I set use sendfile = No and all is well. I have a separate system Suse 9.0 pro with use sendfile = yes and I have no problems. What is the difference??? -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. RANKIN * BERTIN, PLLC 510 Ochiltree

I have seen some folks on the list with what seems to be a similar issue as I have. I work in a large FX shop and this has been a problem for us since the 3.0.7 upgrade. If anyone has a known to work config, could you share your set up info please? Jerry what kernel, and other system bits versions do you test on? The system has a 2.4.21 kernel with xfs filesystems. It is a redhat 9 machine on

Why in smbd/reply.c does send_file_readX only use sendfile if write cache size is 0? <snip> if (chain_size ==0 && (CVAL(inbuf,smb_vwv0) == 0xFF) && lp_use_sendfile( SNUM(conn)) && (lp_write_cache_size(SNUM(conn)) == 0) ) { </snip> While its true send_file_readX works regardless of the state of oplocks (which is cool!) the smb.conf.5

Hello Experts: I understand from the samba code (3.0.25) that we use sendfile during client's Read operation. Is there a reason for not using the same for write operation? Is it to do with header processing etc. Thanks for your feedback!

Hi all, sendfile() could be enabled in NGINX(https://www.sobyte.net/post/2022-08/nginx-send/). It could improves the performance since it could optimize to transfer data to user space. Up to now, sendfile() isn?t supported in OpenSSH yet. Will it be supported in the future? Best Regards Haojian

A new TRAC entry with patch has been added (initially for Camping) to allow X-SendFile on Windows to use DirHandler to send files on drives other than the current drive, if the DirHandler base path is "/" (which is the way Camping uses DirHandler). As it was, "/" gets expanded to "C:/", and then you can''t serve files on any other drive, which I needed to do

I''m using Camping (though I suspect this applies to RoR just as well, and if you have an RoR specific answer I''d be happy to hear it, I may switch) to do a number of things for an internal application, one of which is transferring large files (~2GB each) between machines over the network. I thought the easy route would just be to make an app that when given the filename, serves