similar to: server is not imap4 compatible

I've been testing alpha4, and every once in a while my client (Thunderbird 1.5 RC1) tells me the dovecot isn't a valid IMAP4 server. This is usually (maybe always) when I first bring up the client up. If I just ask the client to get the mail again, it does so happily (without any errors). I must say I found dovecot as a pleasant surprise. We have been using UW. Which didn't

Hi Team, I need to develop Visual VoiceMail solution. In this solution I need a IMAP4 server, from which I can get a hit for each mail retrieval. Can anyone help me if dovecot can be used for this purpose. BR, Rajesh Bansal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named >> Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. > I have a partial implementation in my patch queue. I haven't worked on > it for a few months now due to other projects that took

I have two questions: 1. What method/tool (other than a MuA) can I use to test my Dovecot setup from Windows CLI when ssl is enabled? I have tried connecting to to the pop3/imap4 services from a Windows PC but here is what I get: [pop3] +OK Dovecot-2.0-sis ready. user wash at domain.co.ke -ERR Plaintext authentication disallowed on non-secure (SSL/TLS) connections. [imap4] OK [CAPABILITY

I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. -- Jes?s Cea Avi?n _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM Rajesh Bansal via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I need to develop Visual VoiceMail solution. In this solution I need a IMAP4 server, from which I can get a hit for each mail retrieval. Can anyone help me if dovecot can be used for this purpose. > That is rather vague. Do you want to do something like

Op 20-10-2019 om 22:33 schreef Jean-Daniel via dovecot: > > >> Le 20 oct. 2019 ? 22:24, Mauricio Tavares via dovecot >> <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> a ?crit : >> >> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM Rajesh Bansal via dovecot >> <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >>>

> On September 26, 2016 at 4:14 PM Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > > On 9/19/2016 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > >> On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: > >>> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension

If you use an Iphone (and your mobile proivder supports it) then you are using it ;-) just my 2 cents Am 21.10.2019 um 12:26 schrieb Stephan Bosch via dovecot: > > > Op 20-10-2019 om 22:33 schreef Jean-Daniel via dovecot: >> >> >>> Le 20 oct. 2019 ? 22:24, Mauricio Tavares via dovecot >>> <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at

Is Binary Content Extension (rfc3516) support planned? -- WBR, Anton Yuzhaninov

Hello, I am looking at PARTIAL responses using a dovecot version 2.2.5 and am running into an inconsistency with the RFC which I would like to ask about. The following section http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5267#section-4.4 lists client requests and server responses which I have tried running against a folder, specifying the ranges that fit the contents of the folder I have selected.

> Le 20 oct. 2019 ? 22:24, Mauricio Tavares via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> a ?crit : > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM Rajesh Bansal via dovecot > <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> >> >> I need to develop Visual VoiceMail solution. In this solution I need a IMAP4 server, from which I can get a hit for each

Thank you! Ok, so I can omit ssl=no and startssl=no, and this results in default settings for ssl which is 'off'? Or the defaults are 'on' anyway? Can I somehow specify ports on remote hosts that proxy will use to connect to? Like (just image): 'proxy host_imap=10.1.1.1:143 host_pop=10.1.1.1:110' or somehow? On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:33 PM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at

Seen that URL but port= is strange due to there is no protocol connection. So if I set port=12345 then what proto will I see there? Misleading setting this is why I mentioned (non-existing) per-proto port setting above. May I please ask for any example on how to pass port per proto? It is a bit fuzzy for me to figure it out but I do believe you used to use it somehow. On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at

auth process receives the protocol requested when performing authentication as variable %s (see https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables) You can use this to choose the value you return for port. Aki > On 17 September 2018 at 16:56 Alexander Chekalin <alexander.chekalin at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Seen that URL but port= is strange due to there is no protocol connection. > So

Hi, I try to set up dovecot as a proxy server, to proxy requests to several dovecot-based backend servers. I wand external clients who connects to this proxy Dovecot to use TLS (this is easy to set up) while want to have unsecured (plain IMAP/POP) connections to backends. You see, links to backends are over LAN so no TLS needed, and these backends are poor old machines (with old Docecots like

I've experienced with automatic client logout (probably after IDLE command sent by a client). I simply run any imap4 client and get this in mail.log: May 14 18:26:37 athlon dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<neptunix at tehexergo.ru>, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.0.3, lip=192.168.0.3, secured May 14 18:26:37 athlon dovecot: IMAP(neptunix at tehexergo.ru): Loading modules from directory:

Fellow dovecot users/contributors, I am building a POP3/IMAP4 proxy solution for an enterprise, where users can login with their common username and then they get single sign-on to all kinds of different applications in the backend. Some of these applications are SaaS apps like gmail. For gmail in particular, I want dovecot to solve the following issues for me: 1. be an IMAP4/POP3 proxy in

The port is determined with port=nnn setting. You can't return per-protocol port like that, you need to look at the protocol requested by user and return port based on that, or you can omit port to default into "standard port". not using ssl/starttls is default. > On 17 September 2018 at 16:35 Alexander Chekalin <alexander.chekalin at gmail.com> wrote: > > >

hello, i tried to use the "dovecot sasl" with postfix using pam as backend (actually pam_krb5) but it doesn't work. dovecot runs well as pop3 server authenticating with the pam_krb5 module with the config below, but it doesn't even connect with the kerberos server (a remote AD 2003) when it's called from postfix. --------dovecot.conf--------- protocols = pop3 pop3s imap