similar to: zfs root, jumpstart and flash archives

Using build 70, I followed the zfsboot instructions at http:// www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsboot-manual/ to the letter. I tried first with a mirror zfsroot, when I try to boot to zfsboot the screen is flooded with "init(1M) exited on fatal signal 9" Than I tried with a simple zfs pool (not mirrored) and it just reboots right away. If I try to setup grub

Hi, I was just wondering if ZFS root is likely to be an install option any time soon, either in SXCR or the June Solaris update? The mechanism at Tabriz''s blog seem to work well, but it''d be nice to get it out of the box. -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/

> Matthew Ahrens wrote: > > Ross Newell wrote: > >> What are this issues preventing the root directory being stored on > >> raidz? > >> I''m talking specifically about root, and not boot which I can see > >> would be > >> difficult. > >> > >> Would it be something an amateur programmer could address in a > >>

hi all Try to learn how UFS root to ZFS root liveUG work. I download the vbox image of s10u8, it come up as UFS root. add a new disks (16GB) create zpool rpool run lucreate -n zfsroot -p rpool run luactivate zfsroot run lustatus it do show zfsroot will be active in next boot init 6 but it come up with UFS root, lustatus show ufsroot active zpool rpool is mounted but not used by boot Is this a

Anyone have idea how to create ZFS pool and volumes during jumstart instalation ? (I''m using JumpStart Enterprise Toolkit) kloczek

Ref: http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_bootable_datasets_happily_rumbling Ref: http://mediacast.sun.com/share/timf/zfs-actual-root-install.sh This is my errata for Tim Foster''s zfs root install script: 1/ Correct mode for /tmp should be 1777. 2/ The zfs boot install should allow you to have /usr on a separate zpool: a/ We need to create /zfsroot/usr/lib in the root partition and

Machine is running x86 snv_94 after recent upgrade from opensolaris 2008.05. ZFS and zpool reported no troubles except suggesting upgrade for from ver.10 to ver.11. seemed like a good idea at the time. system up for several days after that point then took down for some unrelated maintenance. now will not boot the opensol, drops to grub prompt, no menus. zfs was mirrored on two disks c6d0s0 and

I''ve upgraded my system from ufs to zfs (root pool). By default, it creates a zvol for dump and swap. It''s a 4GB Ultra-45 and every late night/morning I run a job which takes around 2GB of memory. With a zvol swap, the system becomes unusable and the Sun Ray client often goes into "26B". So I removed the zvol swap and now I have a standard swap partition. The

I wanted to send out status on the effort to make a version of Solaris install available that supports zfs as a root file system. I''ve got a version of it ready for distribution, but I''d like to test it on the Build 62 community release before I make it available. Without the build 62 community release, I have to test it on a build 61 image, updated with some build 62 packages.

With the release of the Nevada build 90 binaries, it is now possible to install SXCE directly onto a ZFS root filesystem, and also put ZFS swap onto a ZFS filesystem without worrying about having it deadlock. ZFS now also supports crash dumps! To install SXCE to a ZFS root, simply use the text-based installer, after choosing "Solaris Express" from the boot menu on the DVD. DVD download

I am afraid a search does not get much on this subject, hence this post. Is there a plan for a Nevada build to include zfs root/boot on Sparc architecture? When? This message posted from opensolaris.org

I searched thru all the postings about RJS, and I didn''t find one person who complained of problems specific to IE, but that''s what I''ve got. My environment is: Rails 1.0 + RJS Plugin Updated Javascripts to Scriptaculous 1.5.3 (for evalScripts support) Monkeypatched in_place_editor to support evalScripts I have just started using RJS, and I have two .rjs templates.

hi, guys, my first post. i'm scouring the web site, but don't seem to be able to find a compatibility mapping for older versions of samba. i need to upgrade to the latest sparc version which is compatible with solaris 8...all my searches are bringing up the solaris 9 code. can someone point me in the right direction? thanks (and apologies in advance if it is easy to find and i'm

Back in October/November 2007 when I asked about Sparc zfs boot and root capabilities, I got a reply indicating late December 2007 for a possible release. I was wondering what is the status right now, will this feature make it into build 79? This message posted from opensolaris.org

This patch is dependant on the previously submitted storage admin patch.

I''ve upgraded to Rails 1.1.2, and I''m trying to push this change through to our build server (Linux/Oracle) and we are getting some errors in the unit tests using Oracle. Looking at the data in the tests reveals a precision problem. Looking at the tables tells the whole story. My development database contains this table: SQL> describe dls_grids; Name

Hi all, Does anybody know how to include a partial (next to @content_for_layout) in a layout file? I''m looking for a something like @partial_for_include => ''filename'' in my layout files. So a linked .rhtml file gets picked up from within a layout file. All my layout files (4 at the moment) have a <div class="navright"> tag, so one change in the

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1051&aid=3960&group_id=256 I posted this bug yesterday. Seems to be confirmed, since someone else has the same problem on a different platform (Fedora 4 and Max OS X). So, if you are using Oracle, don''t be in a rush to upgrade to Rails 1.1 unless you have the time to figure this problem out for yourself. -- Lori Olson

I have database password in my database.yml as "passw0rd" however when I go to http://localhost:3000/rails/info/properties I get this error: private method `gsub'' called for 1:Fixnum But if I just use "password" for my password everything is ok. Any ideas? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, this series improves virt-dib, adding some upstream changes, and refactoring the handling of output formats. Thanks, Pino Toscano (6): dib: clear up "already provided" message dib: add --checksum dib: pass custom mkfs options after the filesystem type dib: refactor output formats handling dib: clarify "output:" lines in --machine-readable documentation dib: