similar to: [storage-discuss] ZFS iscsi snapshot - VSS compatible?

I am using a Solaris + ZFS environment to export a iSCSI block layer device and use the snapshot facility to take a snapshot of the ZFS volume. Is there an existing Volume Shadow Copy (VSS) implementation on Windows for this environment? Thanks S Joshi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

We have recently moved our VSS database from windows 2k to samba, initially all looked fine but have come accross a problem. Quite often VSS complains saying it can't write to "names - acess denied". The file its refering to is names.dat in data/ (for those that know VSS) I believe this to be some sort of locking issue. Sometimes getting all other clients to quite VSS solves the

Good day to all, I have been using samba for many months now. And I find it very useful. We have samba-2.2.1a running on a linux operating system. Perhaps before, I haven't had a problem running a samba service since only few user make access to our samba server. Now, many groups requested for a samba account for file sharing purposes. 1 particular group requested to host their visual source

Hello I have a bit of the strange problem. Our developers use MS VSS to check in/out files to or from Solaris drives mapped through samba. When they "set current working directory" to a mapped Solaris drives VSS doesn't recognize files named with uppercase letters converting them into lower case. As a result VSS denies permission to change these files. Looking at the same files in

Hi all, We are considering moving our VSS database from a Win2K server to a samba server. All clients are Win2K clients. I used the VSS tool "testlock.exe" to make sure the native lock mode can be used. The test was successful, and I saw that an SMBlock transaction was performed, and a reply_lockingX was replied. When I opened a VSS database on the samba server and started to use it -

Good Afternoon All. Please forgive me if this is an often-asked question, but ... We're trying to get the ability to have users in the same UNIX group be able to check-in and check-out files from a VSS repository. All users in a defined unix group should be able to copy, edit, and delete any file created by any other user in that group. As most of you probably already know, this works fine

Hello, I am using wine on RH9. I am running Visual Source Safe like thus wine --ssexp.exe THe VSS GUI starts OK. the Visual Source Safe database is on Windows Partition. This Windows Partition is mounted on my Linux like thus: mount -t nfs -o rw,nolock 192.168.0.77:/mnt/server/Share /mnt/vss I am able to launch a VSS session : I can successfully check out and check in files (I point my

With a wine about a month old, running in managed mode, when I ask Visual Source Safe for a revision history, the window doesn't appear, but vss's main window hangs as if it's waiting for me to close the history window. Not much to do at that point but kill Wine. (I also received the error err:tooltips:TOOLTIPS_Timer How did this happen? at about the same time, but that wasn't

Hi, I install a new 4 Port GBit Server with centos 6.3 and I'd like to use nic bonding. Searching for a good how to pinted to this page: http://www.how2centos.com/centos-6-channel-bonding/ My question: Is this the current, good way to bond the 4 ports? The other question: What should I set on the cisco switch for the Port-channel options? As far as I understand for performance and

Did you ever find a solution for using a linux working directory with VSS? Thanks, Charles

Hi Folks, Recently I took the patch Elias Penttil? wrote and 'forward-ported' it to rsync 3. For people who don't know what it does, it implements backup of open files on Windows with rsync. Because I think rsync 3 is more efficient and more current in comparison to rsync 2. I made a small readme-page with information about what I've done so far and the

On 09/11/2015 10:18 AM, Jérôme wrote: >> Yep, that about covers it. Note that the --quiesce step in snapshot >> creation requires qemu-guest-agent running in the guest, and that you >> trust interaction with your guest. > > Yes, I think I get this. I don't really figure out what these cases > could be. We're using Debian Jessie and I installed

On 12/10/2014 11:40 PM, Payes Anand wrote: > Hi, > Is it possible to freeze windows guests for a consistent storage level > snapshot. Yes, if you install qemu-guest-agent in the guest, and wire up your libvirt XML to have the guest-agent channel available. Once you have done that, use the --quiesce flag as part of creating your snapshots. > I was able to freeze Centos guests by

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Gordon Messmer wrote: >Breaking a RAID volume doesn't make filesystems consistent, While using LVM arranges for some filesystems to be consistent (it is not always possible), it does nothing to ensure application consistency which can be just as important. Linux doesn't have a widely deployed analog to Windows' VSS, which provides both though only for

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:03:27 +0100, Marc Roos wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Should I assume that the virsh domfsfreeze, does not require the > qemu-agent service in the guest? No. That's the official way how to drive the "guest-fsfreeze-freeze" agent command via libvirt, thus you must have the guest agent the same way as you used it before. Using qemu-agent-command is a

On 09/11/2015 06:45 AM, Jérôme wrote: > AFAIU, live backups using libvirt may be done thanks to blockcommit as > explained here on the wiki [2]. > > -> Considering our use case, is this the recommended way? Yes, using active block-commit is the ideal way to perform a live backup. > > Assuming yes, here is the plan. > > I wrote a script that does > > #

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: libvirt-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-users- > bounces at redhat.com] Namens Lentes, Bernd > Verzonden: dinsdag 1 december 2015 16:31 > Aan: libvirt-ML > Onderwerp: [libvirt-users] snapshot of running vm's > > Hi, > > i'd like to create snapshots of my running vm's. I have several hosts with >

Paul, > While testing iscsi targets exported from thumpers via 10GbE and > imported 10GbE on T2000s I am not seeing the throughput I expect, > and more importantly there is a tremendous amount of read IO > happending on a purely sequential write workload. (Note all systems > have Sun 10GbE cards and are running Nevada b65.) The read IO activity you are seeing is a direct

Hi Eric. Thank you so much for your quick and relieving answer. Le 2015-09-11 17:05, Eric Blake a écrit : > Yes, using active block-commit is the ideal way to perform a live backup. Great. > Yep, that about covers it. Note that the --quiesce step in snapshot > creation requires qemu-guest-agent running in the guest, and that you > trust interaction with your guest. Yes, I think

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Brent Jones<brent at servuhome.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM, James Lever<j at jamver.id.au> wrote: >> >> On 25/06/2009, at 4:38 PM, John Ryan wrote: >> >>> Can I ask the same question - does anyone know when the 113 build will >>> show up on pkg.opensolaris.org/dev ? >> >> On