similar to: A quick refactoring for handlers and CGI

Just so you know, I''ve read the manual :) http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/choosing_deployment.html No php or ssl needed - that is me - simple. So I should be good to go but thought I''d ask. BTW, sorry about the stupid subject. Listening to BNL, you know ;) On 6/27/06, mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org <mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> wrote: > Send

It''s gotta be Rascal. There''s no fixing Victoria - that''s a re-write from the ground up. And Jake a recipe for disaster; Class Jake < Bat include Pig attr_accessor :one_eye . . end That pig ''ll never fly. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org < mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> Date:

This release of Mongrel features a CGIWrapper that actually works. The previous code was complete garbage so this one should fix the problems with sessions, cookies, and content-types people reported previously. There is also now a correctly built Win32 gem created by Luis Lavena. Luis joined the Mongrel project and will be working on the Win32 specific gear needed. His first thing is going to

Hi Everyone, This is a small release that fixes a little bug, some of the documentation, and adds the new RedirectHandler code and a @redirect@ call for the mongrel.conf files. It''s fresh so don''t rely on it. Everyone should upgrade with the usual *gem update* command (which tells you it''s "Upgrading...") and tell me how it works. This release fixes: * The

It''s time again for your monthly cgi.rb DOS vulnerability. This latest vulnerability is different from the one that cgi_multipart_eof_fix.gem fixed. This one is related to the boundary taken from the web client being used incorrectly. You can read about the vulnerability: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2006/12/04/another-dos-vulnerability-in-cgi-library The applicable PATCH is

>> Can I change my vote to http://samugliestdog.com/Sam162edited.jpg yikes! how''d that get past my firewall? +1 On 6/30/06, mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org <mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> wrote: > Send Mongrel-users mailing list submissions to > mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Alright folks, I put in a fix for camping and added the patch by Thomas Hurst for the accf_http deferred accept settings for FreeBSD. As usual, please test this release out and let me know if it has any additional problems. I''ll be working on win32 builds today and tomorrow with Luis. Install with: sudo gem install fastthread --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases sudo gem

Alright Mongrel people, thanks for contributing to the mayhem around popularity by making me the official King of the Internet. In case you all missed it, here''s my blog post on my first act as King: http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/2006-12-26.html Stay tuned for pedro. I want to make this reign very democratic and chaotic. (I wonder if the Nitro folks will help with pedro?) The whole

On 1/23/07, mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org < mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:48:21 -0800 > From: "Zed A. Shaw" <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> > Subject: [Mongrel] [ANN] Mongrel 1.0.1 Officially Released > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: <20070122214821.4804e941.zedshaw at zedshaw.com>

I don''t think there''s a way to do that other than using a proxy (ISAPI_REWRITE) or just a server-side redirect. I''d love to be proven wrong though. -----Original Message----- From: rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org [mailto:rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] On Behalf Of frazer horn Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:13 AM To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org Subject:

Hi All/Zed, win32 : Is there an Installer/setup for Mongrel along with rails(1.1.6 security patches included) ? Thank you, BR, ~A -----Original Message----- From: Zed Shaw [mailto:zedshaw at zedshaw.com] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:59 AM To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org Cc: ruby-talk ML; rails at lists.rubyonrails.org Subject: [Mongrel] [ANN] Mongrel 0.3.13.4 Pre-Release -- PID Files

This release of Mongrel is coming at you with lots of very little but important features and fixes. The big highlights are: * Initial beginning of the plugin support that will let people write their own handlers and other things for Mongrel. * Timeout now works again but couldn?t find an alternative to the buggy Timeout class. * SwitchTower friendly signal handling for

Okay, I got off my duff this week and have been finishing Mongrel support for IOWA. I now have two handlers that I need to test. One is similar to the Rails handler, passing request handling to IOWA threads in the same process, and the other allows one or more Mongrel processes to pass requests to one or more separate IOWA processes, with session affinity. Is there any set of standard sorts of

Hi Everyone, I have a small pre-release for Mongrel that will eventually be the 0.3.13.3 release, but it needs some quick testing before I make it official. There''s a bug for only some folks and I need to find out what''s causing it. The bug is that the object_id method gets the signature: def object_id(param) end Which is incredibly evil. Normally this does nothing to

Just a quick note for a few new features/fixes available on the Mongrel pre-release and a new document that covers nearly all the big features and configurations for Mongrel. First, the document is http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/howto.html and it covers: * All the start command options including the fresh -G option to generate a config for -C. * The format and usage of the MIME type file (-m

I''m proud to announce the official Mongrel certification program: http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/certified.html Move quick, seats are filling fast for the RubyConf courses. -- Zed A. Shaw http://www.zedshaw.com/ http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ http://www.lingr.com/room/3yXhqKbfPy8 -- Come get help.

Hi, Thanks Zed - this is very interesting. One item in particular caught my eye: Does anyone on this list have any comments or validation that Rails 1.2.1 is 2-4 times as slow as Rails 1.1.6? Topfunky provided a link that purports what looks like really horrible performance and memory characteristics for Rails 1.2.1, even v. 1.1.6:

Calling All Mongrel Minions! I wanna have some fun and would like this as a Christmas present. The site http://www.workingwithrails.com/ has this lame popularity system that''s kind of irking some of the main Ruby contributors. I think it''s kind of funny, but would like to demonstrate what an army of motivated people can do to these kinds of popularity contests. So, as a

Hi Everyone, Just want to get out another ping on the Mongrel pre-release saga. I''ve updated a bunch of the documentation to include documents people have donated and to beef up the FAQ for most of the questions people have asked over the past month. INSTALL gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ CHANGES * Fixed memory leak by switching to Sync rather

Zed, Very cool, finally got around to playing with StatusHandler and StatisticsHandler. One thing that was missing that I wanted was insight into _what_ the RailsHandler was working on, and what was queued up while it sat in single-threaded mode -- ie., the current list of requests. W/ the attached mongrel.conf, I hacked the RailsHandler to keep a hash of active requests, and spit that out