similar to: updated zilstat

We cannot run the zilstat utility (from http://www.richardelling.com/Home/scripts-and-programs-1/zilstat) on an Solaris 10 u9 / x86 installed according SUNWCreq (which is a core install) while it works fine on a similar config but installed with all packages (SUNWCXall) So we know it works in this environment but it seems we miss an essential package here. That causes the dtrace: failed to

We are looking into the possibility of adding a dedicated ZIL and/or L2ARC devices to our pool. We are looking into getting 4 ? 32GB Intel X25-E SSD drives. Would this be a good solution to slow write speeds? We are currently sharing out different slices of the pool to windows servers using comstar and fibrechannel. We are currently getting around 300MB/sec performance with 70-100% disk busy.

On the intro page (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/intro/) it states that "ZFS has ''adaptive endianness'' to cope with different byte order on different platforms". However in the PDF (ZFS: The Last Word in File Systems) on page 3 it states "Not portable between platforms (e.g. x86 to/from SPARC)" So is it or isn''t it? Thanks, John. This

Please check whether you have latest '' MPT '' patch installed on your server ? If not , please install MPT patch . It will fix the issue . Regards, Gowrisankar . On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, <zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org>wrote: > Send zfs-discuss mailing list submissions to > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe

Today, Compellant announced their zNAS addition to their unified storage line. zNAS uses ZFS behind the scenes. http://www.compellent.com/Community/Blog/Posts/2010/4/Compellent-zNAS.aspx Congrats Compellant! -- richard ZFS storage and performance consulting at http://www.RichardElling.com ZFS training on deduplication, NexentaStor, and NAS performance Las Vegas, April 29-30, 2010

On 9/4/07 4:34 PM, "Richard Elling" <Richard.Elling at Sun.COM> wrote: > Hi Andy, > my comments below... > note that I didn''t see zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org in the CC for the > original... > > Andy Lubel wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I have been asked to implement a zfs based solution using storedge 6130 and >> im chasing my own

FYI, Seagate has announced a new enterprise SSD. The specs appear to be competitive: + 2.5" form factor + 5 year warranty + power loss protection + 0.44% annual failure rate (AFR) (2M hours MTBF, IMHO too low :-) + UER 1e-16 (new), 1e-15 (5 years) + 30,000/25,000 4 KB read IOPS (peak/aligned zero offset) + 30,000/10,500 4 KB write IOPS (peak/aligned zero offset)

So, does anyone know if I can run ZFS on my iPhone? ;-) -- richard

I''ve blogged about the trade-offs for space, performance, and MTTDL (RAS) for ZFS and RAID in general. http://blogs.sun.com/relling/entry/zfs_raid_recommendations_space_performance Enjoy. -- richard

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Damjan Perenic<damjan.perenic at guest.arnes.si> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Richard > Elling<richard.elling at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:39 AM, Ed Spencer wrote: >> >>> I suspect that if we ''rsync'' one of these filesystems to a second >>> server/pool ?that we would

I''m working with a Cyrus IMAP server running on a T2000 box under Solaris 10 10/09 with current patches. Mailboxes reside on six ZFS filesystems, each containing about 200 gigabytes of data. These are part of a single zpool built on four Iscsi devices from our Netapp filer. One of these ZFS filesystems contains a number of global and per-user databases in addition to one sixth of the

If you''ve been hiding under a rock, not checking your email, then you might not have heard about the Next Big Whopper Event for ZFS Fans: ZFS Day! The agenda is now set and the teams are preparing to descend towards San Francisco''s Moscone Center vortex for a full day of ZFS. I''d love to see y''all there in person, but if you can''t make it, be sure to

Hi, My customer says: ------------------------------------ Application has NFS directories with millions of files in a directory, and this can''t changed. We are having issues with the EMC appliance and RPC timeouts on the NFS lookup. I am looking doing is moving one of the major NFS exports to as Sun 25k using VCS to cluster a ZFS RAIDZ that is then NFS exported. For performance I

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Richard Elling <Richard.Elling at sun.com> wrote: > Philip Brown wrote: >> I''ve recently started down the road of production use for zfs, and am hitting my head on some paradigm shifts. I''d like to clarify whether my understanding is correct, and/or whether there are better ways of doing things. >> I have one question for

You could always use 40-gigabit between the two storage systems which would speed things dramatically, or back to back 56-gigabit IB. ---------------------------------------- From: zfs-discuss-request@opensolaris.org Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:01 PM To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 Send zfs-discuss mailing list submissions to

The time has come to review the current Contributor and Core contributor grants for ZFS. Since all of the ZFS core contributors grants are set to expire on 02-24-2009 we need to renew the members that are still contributing at core contributor levels. We should also add some new members to both Contributor and Core contributor levels. First the current list of Core contributors: Bill

ZFS fans, Recalling our conversation about hot-plug and hot-swap terminology and use, I afraid to say that CR 6483250 has been closed as will-not-fix. No explaination was given. If you feel strongly about this, please open another CR and pile on. *Change Request ID*: 6483250 *Synopsis*: X2100 release notes inconsistent with Sun terminology, confuses customers Status: 11-Closed Substatus: Will

apparently if you don''t order a J4200 with drives, you just get filler sleds that won''t accept a hard drive. (had to look at a parts breakdown on sunsolve to figure this out -- the docs should simply make this clear.) it looks like the sled that will accept a drive is part #570-1182. anyone know how i could order 12 of these?

Hi folks, Myself and a colleague are currently involved in a prototyping exercise to evaluate ZFS against our current filesystem. We are looking at the best way to arrange the disks in a 3510 storage array. We have been testing with the 12 disks on the 3510 exported as "nraid" logical devices. We then configured a single ZFS pool on top of this, using two raid-z arrays. We are getting

Is there any way to increase the ZFS performance? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org