similar to: Pin in the Map - "tinyurl for maps" rails app

Hi all, Is LondonOnRails going to meet up again? I''m keen to come along to the next meeting when it takes place, or help organise such a meet if help is needed. Chris

I really would like to know how people are using the Story and Example runner to write their software.It would be great to get some direction on it, because I think I''m missing some points. Taking the outside-in approach in thought: At first we write a high-level customer-facing story, this story fails. Then we start using mocks at object level to use them as a design tool, and so we

Hi all, I''m chewing through writing some functional tests for an app at the moment, and it occurs to me that open_session could be used to help write single-controller tests as well as the integration ones. Used as described here[1]; it''s an extremely useful idiom. Any thoughts? Should it be moved, or generally made available, or am I missing the point here? Regards Chris [1]

hi, for example, I have an string "q1 q2 q3". how can I encode it in rails to produce the result like "q1%20q2%20q3". Thanks! Best Regards, Zhenjian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060717/3824f992/attachment.html

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100758 Bug ID: 100758 Summary: Kernel Oops when starting X nv50_dma_push Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee:

Hi, I''m new to Rails and Ruby and can''t access methods/columns from an ActiveRecord object that is a "piggy-back" row as described by David here: http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000235.html Via Console I can create the piggyback object but reading attributes gives "TypeError: cannot convert String into Integer" (this is in Console and the browser).

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50830 Bug #: 50830 Summary: GeForce 8500 GT Connectors Reversed Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hi, I use Sarge's dovecot for a pop3 mail collection server. IMAP is not used at all. It works well, but I would like to know why one of the accounts also keeps a copy of all e-mail copies in the cur/ folder? Thanks a lot, Wally -- Wally Winchester wally_winchester at fastmail.fm -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be

On 29 November 2016 at 17:38, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > I see, but I looked over your proposed implementation from earlier in the > thread, and if I'm not mistaken I see this: That's a different suggestion. > That said, what did you think about my other proposal of the complicated UDL > with macro? > > #define LIT(x) x_string_ref_literal >

Well, apparently clang has clang::StringLiteral in clang/AST/Expr.h So, our options are either: Allow this name clash (obviously the namespaces don't clash, only the names) and deal with it when it's an issue (which will be limited to clang, and even then not very often), or choose a different name. Thoughts? On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:53 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>

On 24 November 2016 at 15:04, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> Creating constexpr StringRefs isn't trivial as strlen isn't portably >> constexpr and std::char_traits<char>::length is only constexpr in >> C++17. > > Why don't we just create our own traits class that has a constexpr length, and then we can switch over to the standard one when

OK - good to know. (not sure we're talking about pessimizing it - just not adding a new/possible optimization, to be clear) Just out of curiosity - are there particular reasons you prefer or need to ship an MSVC built version, rather than a bootstrapped Clang? On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > So I wouldn't personally worry too

On 28 November 2016 at 20:51, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The basic idea here is that you introduce a StringLiteral class and anywhere > you want to use a global constructor, you make sure to declare a constexpr > array instead of a normal array, and you make it of type StringLiteral. I prefer constexpr llvm_strlen() over StringLiteral because

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:03 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Well, apparently clang has clang::StringLiteral in clang/AST/Expr.h > > So, our options are either: Allow this name clash (obviously the > namespaces don't clash, only the names) and deal with it when it's an issue > (which will be limited to clang, and even then not

I can. I'll whip something up today On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:18 AM Malcolm Parsons <malcolm.parsons at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 December 2016 at 17:12, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > +1 from me for the StringLiteral proposal from a few messages back. > > Zachary, do you want to commit StringLiteral? > > -- > Malcolm Parsons >

char buffer[100]; And it also allows LIT(buffer) to compile, whereas the UDL doesn't. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:54 AM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:52 AM, Malcolm Parsons <malcolm.parsons at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On 29 November 2016 at 17:38, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > >>

Hi all, There is a desire to be able to create constexpr StringRefs to avoid static initializers for global tables of/containing StringRefs. Creating constexpr StringRefs isn't trivial as strlen isn't portably constexpr and std::char_traits<char>::length is only constexpr in C++17. Alp Toker tried to create constexpr StringRefs for strings literals by subclassing StringRef:

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:10 AM Mueller-Roemer, Johannes Sebastian via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What about going for > > template<unsigned N> > constexpr StringRef(const char (&Str)[N]) > > and avoiding strlen entirely for string literals? > You'd at least want an assert in there (that N - 1 == strlen(Str)) in case a StringRef is

On 2 December 2016 at 17:12, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > +1 from me for the StringLiteral proposal from a few messages back. Zachary, do you want to commit StringLiteral? -- Malcolm Parsons

On 28 November 2016 at 19:30, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > This thread started with: "There is a desire to be able to create constexpr > StringRefs to avoid static initializers for global tables of/containing > StringRefs.” > > I don’t have more information, but maybe Malcolm can elaborate? I was restating your motivation from