similar to: Rails and Mongrel

Hi, I use Mongrel to serve my Rails applications on my server, but how can I serve more than one application with one mongrel server? Thanks. -jec -- Best regards / Salutations. Jean-Eric Cuendet Senior developer / Technical support Riskpro Technologies SA Av. Louis-Ruchonnet 2 CH-1003 Lausanne Switzerland Direct : +41 21 637 0123 Principal : +41 21 637 0110 Fax : +41 21 637 0111

Hi mongrel-users, This is my first post, so I''m not sure if it''s been asked before, but I can''t find an answer anywhere. If I have one rails application running, one processor I''m running it on, and mongrel is multi-threaded, why should I have more than one mongrel running? Everyone seems to agree on 3-5 mongrels per rails app, but why? I must be

Hello, I''m running mongrel behind apache via proxypass. Every now and then, a spammer tries to proxy traffic through apache, and for some reason, apache forwards the request to mongrel, even though it''s not a site being hosted by me. At times this seems to cause mongrel to become unresponsive, and all requests to the site then fail with a proxy error until mongrel is

Hello Everyone, This is the official 0.3.13.3 release of Mongrel. Mongrel is now released under the *Ruby license* instead of the LGPL. I''m hoping this increases the adoption of Mongrel even further and hopefully I can start pushing to get Mongrel included in Ruby directly. INSTALL As usual, you install it with your friendly gem install method of choice: gem install mongrel Or

Hi all, Both the rails book (1st Ed) and the docs on the rails site (*and* the Mongrel FAQ) tell me that rails (& ActionPack /ActiveRecord) is not threadsafe. Since I need lots of worker threads in the app I''m working on (details at the end of this mail) this poses quite a problem for me. Is the lack of thread safety a conscious design decision (kind of understandable for rails

I don''t think there''s a way to do that other than using a proxy (ISAPI_REWRITE) or just a server-side redirect. I''d love to be proven wrong though. -----Original Message----- From: rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org [mailto:rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] On Behalf Of frazer horn Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:13 AM To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org Subject:

>From http://blog.codefront.net/2008/01/02/whats-new-on-edge-rails-the-pilot/ A native Mongrel handler has been introduced. This is so that it can be worked on independent of Mongrel?s release cycle (the Rails handler is currently in the Mongrel codebase). Jeremy Kemper (bitsweat) has already made a minor performance improvement by moving the mutex from the handler itself into the dispatcher.

Is it possible to have mongrel not advertise itself or at least its version in response headers ie. Server: Mongrel 0.3.13.4 Sorry if I missed this directive in the docs but I couldn''t find it anywhere. Thanks GW -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20061219/025d1383/attachment.html

Hi Zed or anyone that is also looking at Mongrel, Just want to report something that, although doesn''t crash mongrel, is rather annoying. I am running the latest Mongrel 0.3.13.3 - ruby version on cygwin (yeah, poor me). When I start mongrel_rails with ActiveRecord::Base.allow_concurrency = true in environment.rb, I see a lot of "Error sending file

Following errors are taken from monrgrel running in development mode. It complained routes.rb, no such file or directory and then sometimes i get application.rb, no such file or directory.Doesn''t seem correct to me. Though not so often, but even production servers throw these errors sometimes, and i have no special routes setup or something.Its pretty much default one, except few changes

I did some basic speed test on my rails application. I use Centrino 1.7GHz, WinXP. For simple test I used Apache ''ab -n 100 -c 10 http://url.... '' Running Mongrel 0.3.11 I got: development env. = 4.5 req./sec production env. = 11.5 req./sec Running Webrick I got: development env. = 5.7 req./sec production env. =25.9 req./sec Does anyone know why the webrick is still faster?

Hi All I am using version 0.3.13.3 and since there is no logging support for win32 application. I was wondering if it was possible to get any kind of logging at all. I have tried to these two options 1. Stream redirection using "mongrel_rails start -c C:/myspace/snapshot -p 4111 -t 70 -e production -P log/mongrel-1.pid > C:\temp\mongrel-1.log" The console print the output stream

Heya Folks- This is mainly for Zed and Mentalguy. I have been playing with the new release of rubygems 0.9.0.8 and I have a major problem with the requirement that fastthread needs to be required before thread. Just requiring rubygems and then requiring fastthread right after that will throw the error: ez _blog $ ruby require ''rubygems'' require

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Everyone, I''m happy to announce the 0.2.0 release of Mongrel -- the fastest HTTP 1.1 library Ruby has yet. http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ -- ruby docs lame page. http://rubyforge.org/projects/mongrel/ -- project page. Special thanks to Tom Copland for setting up my RubyForge goodness, and to Why for kicking in time to get the Camping examples up to snuff. This release should

Hey Everybody! I was wondering if/how Camping can process more than one request at once (i.e. not what Rails does). I''m fairly new to threads, and I bought a book, and read some of it, and dived into the Camping source... I found some thread stuff but I''m not... entirely sure. So I thought I would ask! RYan. http://yeahnah.org/

Hi Everyone, This is a small release that fixes a little bug, some of the documentation, and adds the new RedirectHandler code and a @redirect@ call for the mongrel.conf files. It''s fresh so don''t rely on it. Everyone should upgrade with the usual *gem update* command (which tells you it''s "Upgrading...") and tell me how it works. This release fixes: * The

Sometime my mongrel server threads..would simply stop responding to the requests...and in the logs i get following error: Tue Sep 05 03:56:40 IST 2006: ERROR: Transport endpoint is not connected - getpeername(2) Tue Sep 05 03:59:21 IST 2006: ERROR: Transport endpoint is not connected - getpeername(2) Tue Sep 05 03:59:21 IST 2006: ERROR: Transport endpoint is not connected - getpeername(2) Tue Sep

well, so File upload seems to be only working under mongrel. I have not tried it, but Camping crash extracting the request parameters on both CGI and FastCGI. I''m looking at rails code for inspiration, but it''s a bit outside of my knowledge..... not sure what to do with a FCGI::Stream object ..... this is what rails do for CGI, I''m not sure if it works the same for

I really like the idea of using Mongrel. But reading the FAQ, I noticed something that might be an issue. It stated: "Ruby on Rails is not thread safe so there is a synchronized block around the calls to Dispatcher.dispatch. This means that everything is threaded right before and right after Rails runs. While Rails is running there is only one controller in operation at a time." So