similar to: can''t run on Windows

Hi Kevin/All, I''m a rails/ruby noob. Have put a rails app in production on Windows :-) We have put our java apps in production using SUSE. If you can throw some light On "SUSE is gorgeous but slow" -- it will help us. Is only ruby/rails slow on Suse OR is it considered to be generally slow distro for all apps ? If slow for most apps, how much Performance hit is that ?

Has anyone had any success with the mongrel_secure_download gem? I keep getting "connection reset" errors. -- Cheers, Kevin

Hi Luis, answers in CAPS. -----Original Message----- From: Luis Lavena [mailto:luislavena at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 5:39 PM To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org Subject: [Mongrel] no log/mongrel.log file on win32, looking for suggestions... Hello Mongrels around the world! Been thinking a way to unify the issue I described in the subject. For those who aren''t

Hello Mongrels around the world! Been thinking a way to unify the issue I described in the subject. For those who aren''t aware, mongrel (actually, mongrel_rails) only generate the log file if daemonize was used (-d) That means no log file under windows, due his lack of fork/daemonization capabilities. Now, users that need to run mongrel on windows cannot report and fill the empty

Has anyone had troubles from Mongrel > 1.0.1? Just curious, because the last time I tried to run Merb it gave me some Mongrel error about the wrong number of arguments, or something like that. I can post the exact message tonight when I get home. -- Cheers, Kevin Williams http://kevwil.com/ http://www.almostserio.us/ http://kevwil.jaiku.com/

Hello Windows Users! I have finally got my new computer with it''s win32 build working and have just done the first pre-release for 0.3.13 that has win32 support. *** All win32 users should try to grab the pre-release and tell me if it works. *** You can install it with: $ gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ >From EITHER win32 or any other platform

I have a fresh installation of Ruby, Rails and Mongrel. Unfortunately the server doesn''t start. Any ideas ? => Booting Mongrel (use ''script/server webrick'' to force WEBrick) => Rails application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server ** Starting Mongrel listening at 0.0.0.0:3000 ** Starting Rails with

Please forgive me if this is a stupid question. If it has been answered already, please point me to the answer, as my searching has been fruitless. How can I programatically handle 404s and 500s when using Mongrel? I''ve read about using a proxy server config (.htaccess for example) to render an ErrorDocument rather than whatever comes from Rails, but I need something different. I would

To follow up this bug report: When you run mongrel_rails without the daemonize option -d on *nix, it also don''t generate log/mongrel.log file! Because win32 cannot Process.fork like *nix, should it start logging to logfile after showing Ctrl+C option? Suggestions are welcome on how to reply to this "feature". -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are

All, Mongrel 1.1.3 Rails 2.0.2 Ruby 1.8.6 Windows XP SP2 When I issue the command "ruby script/server" from any of my Rails projects on v. 2.0.2, I get a Windows dialog with the error: "The application has failed to start because MSVCR80.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem." I''ve gone through the process of attempting to introduce

On 10/13/07, Raj Prakash <spamraj at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am having the exact same problem described by Jonah Fox here: > > http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-May/003647.html > > I was wondering if you have found a solution yet. It is not the session > issue. > Are you sure about the session storage? have you tried changing it? On XP

I''m following merb trunk. This morning I updated my gems, sync''d merb source and installed the merb gem from source. I don''t know if I did something wrong, or if a new gem messed things up, or if there was a merb change which broke something. Now I get this error: Request: REQUEST_URI: / (2007-11-05 20:27:04) Params: {"action"=>"index",

64bit Intel 8 CPU server Windows 2003 Server Service set to run as LocalSystem, doesn''t work as user account either The error we see is: "Service failed to start in a timely..." Which I have seen in the past email trails as working The app works from mongrel_rails start and from mongrel_service console -N servicename -p 3000 -c c:\rails_apps\appname -e production We upgraded

Is mongrel stable enough to be used in a production environment? Is it stable? If so, which version is recommended? Thanks, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20060407/8d3ad7b4/attachment.htm

I''ve liked the scgi runner ever since it came out. I like the way it''scontrolled, the way it''s clusterable, and the fact that it runs onwin32 platforms so easily. Now it''s May 2006, and the scgi runner hasn''t changed since October,and now we have mongrel. I keep seeing hints of clustering in mongrel,as well. I just downloaded the win32 installer for

Today I return to Ruby after 12 months. I find I have several installations, including Ruby 1.9!? Decided to rationlise things a bit before starting to learn Ruby again from scratch. Rails is hot stuff and I find I also had an old version of InstantRails (this is an XP machine... calm down now, it''s all I''ve got (well not quite, but I''ll come to that later)).

Hello Mongrels, Mongrel 1.1 is out with fullblown JRuby support, some reorganization, and some bugfixes. Also, Mongrel_cluster has been updated to 1.0.4. Go subscribe to the all-new news feed, because we probably won''t announce to the list anymore: http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/rss.xml Thanks Evan, and the Mongrel Team -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

Hello Guys, Been testing fastthread (known on previous releases as optimized_locking) for soon to be released 0.3.18 mswin32 gems (official ones). Attached to this message is the ruby script I used for the test results shown on graphics [1] and [2] The idea of the script is simulate what Mongrel do with threads creating a simple workload for testing Ruby VM stability. [1] refers to normal,

Hello Mongrel Users! This is my first post! Is there an expected release date for the fixed version of mongrel_service that will resolve the missing service::start command? I would love to use the much improved features of the new mongrel_service, but I haven''t been able to yet. I haven''t figured out how to follow Zed''s advice on a previous thread to just use the

On 8/11/06, Matthew Bass <pelargir at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, Luis. I''ve been following your Mongrel thread here: > http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2006-May/000210.html > > I''m also running Win2K and have been trying to get Mongrel running as a > service, without much luck. I tried running daemon_test.rb like you said and > was able to get