similar to: Python-Markdown 2.0 Release Candidate

I'd like to announce a beta release of the Fenced-Code-Blocks Extension for Python-Markdown. <http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/Available_Extensions> The latest code for Python-Markdown and packaged extensions are now available on Gitorious. <http://gitorious.org/projects/python-markdown> The same syntax is used as the just released PHP Markdown Extra 1.2. I

On 10/6/07, Lou Quillio <public at quillio.com> wrote: [snip] > Wish there were an 'Extra' for Python. > There is. Sort of. Python-Markdown has an extension interface [1]. There's a number already available and its fairly easy to write your own. I've slowly been adding many of php extra's features [2]. Unfortunately, some things are still hard, but were working to

I am happy to announce the release of Python-Markdown 2.0 final. We have versions for Python 2.3-2.6 and Python 3.0! See the release notes here: https://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=674043&group_id=153041 Download from PyPI here: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Markdown/2.0 -- ---- \X/ /-\ `/ |_ /-\ |\| Waylan Limberg

I like to use markdown's reference links with the implicit name syntax. It allows keeping a table of links seperate from the referencing link. However, what I don't like is that I have no way of (optionally) including the table of links in the markdown's output. For instance, in the example: I get 10 times more traffic from [Google][] than from [Yahoo][] or [MSN][]. [google]:

Python-markdown currently replaces all straight quotes (`"`) with the html entity (`&quot;`). Someone recently complained about this in a [bug report][]. As it turns out the quote was the symptom that brought the real problem to light[^1]. In any event, the reporter pointed out that markdown.pl does not replace straight quotes with the html entity. I know John Gruber has mentioned before

I just received a report [1] that the footnote output we use in Python-Markdown (an exact copy of PHP Markdown Extra [3]) is not valid HTML [3]. If you notice he's using HTML5. At least the footnote syntax does valid on XHTML1 or HTML4. Anyway, any suggestions on how the various footnote implementations want to move forward with this? [1]: https://github.com/waylan/Python-Markdown/issues/129

I wrote myself a script to convert Open Document files to Markdown. Being able to do "odt2txt.py mydoc.odt | less" is the main motivation, but it also works for doing command line conversion of odt to html by combining odt2txt with any of the Markdown implementations. If anyone uses OpenOffice and wants to check it out: http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/odt2txt.php

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote: > > "Safe mode" you say? Yeah, well, I didn't paint that bike shed. > > PHP Markdown also has a no-markup mode which would filter script tags > and any other HTML tags. But this doesn't prevent anyone from > inserting their own script on the page. Do you know you can

Last night I released version 2.3 of Python Markdown (see the release notes [1] for all the details). In addition to various other improvements, a new **experimental** extension was included that added a syntax for generating rST-style admonitions [2]. For a summary of the syntax, see the documentation [3]. A broader sample of the output can be seen on this page [4]. The source text can be found

Hi, I'm getting what I believe to be a bug. If I put the following in markdown: 1. This is a numbered list 2. Blah 9. This is another list item 10. Ok, weird bug here 11. It's really bothering me And when I run it through markdown.pl 1.01 I get out the following: <ol> <li>This is a numbered list</li> <li>Blah</li> <li>This is another

Hi, everyone, I have one conflict problem when I try to install Centos YUM on RHEL 4_X 86_64. Uname -a shows: Linux PT3 2.6.9-42.0.0.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Sun Oct 15 15:13:57 PDT 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Yum -version shows: Repository update is listed more than once in the configuration Repository base is listed more than once in the configuration Repository contrib is listed

Hello all, I'm announcing python-markdown2 -- another Python implementation of Markdown. (MIT license.) http://code.google.com/p/python-markdown2/ It should be a drop-in replacement for [markdown.py](http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/). It fixes some issues that I ran into with markdown.py [^1]. I believe that it is faster than markdown.py [^2] and on par or a little

Hi folks, Yesterday I raised an issue about inconsistent preservation of whitespace<http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/Tickets/000087>in Python-Markdown. >>> import markdown >>> md = markdown.Markdown() >>> md.convert('Added `>>> ` to signify user input.') u'<p>Added

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:54 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Yes, I tried, but it fails with > > ../src/util/virfile.c:42:11: fatal error: libutil.h: No such file or > > directory > > You'd have to delete the build dir and re-run meson so that it > auto-detects again. > > OK, that issue seems gone, but ninja reports lots of

> Anyway, a spec for Markdown Extra would contain a spec for Markdown as > well, wouldn't it? I think the whole enterprise would be a lot more valuable, if we produce a combined spec, which would be self-contained, and call it Markdown 2.0. I don't think we necessarily need a formal grammar. What we need is to create a document, starting with "Markdown Syntax" perhaps,

In my work I do some scientific and mathematical writing, and like most people in academia I use LaTeX. I trade a lot of email with colleagues which contains mathematical notation. We all do a lot of LaTeX, so we tend to just drop LaTeX math notation into plaintext; expressions such as `\{ x \mid x^2 \in S \}` are easy to type, and in simple cases fairly easy to read. More complex

> I just received a report [1] that the footnote output we use in > Python-Markdown (an exact copy of PHP Markdown Extra [3]) is not valid > HTML [3]. If you notice he's using HTML5. At least the footnote syntax > does valid on XHTML1 or HTML4. Anyway, any suggestions on how the > various footnote implementations want to move forward with this? > > [1]:

We recently received the following bug report for the python-markdown implementation: > The "&" are escaped in URLs. > > An example: > [Link](http://www.site.com/?param1=value1&param2=value1) > > Should output: > <a href="http://www.site.com/?param1=value1&param2=value1">Link</a> > > Currently outputs: > <a

Hello, I've published a Ruby gem that lets you create slide shows and author slides in plain text using a wiki-style markup language that's easy-to-write and easy-to-read. Yes, that's Markdown. (Textile is supported too ;-) You can find two samples online in Markdown: o http://slideshow.rubyforge.org/svn/samples/rest.text o

Bear with me, this is CentOS related. :) I have a python CGI that's behaving weirldy on Whitebox systems that've been switched over to CentOS 4 (ages ago, no other problems to speak of aside from this one). I've broken the problem down to a minimal test case... 1. Create a small database # sqlite3 /tmp/testcase.db 'CREATE TABLE testtable ( date date primary key unique, name