similar to: OpenBSD TFTPD remap rules

AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is passed and no network device is up yet. This addresses Debian bug

Hello Ron, On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:08:49PM +1030, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, > > which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also > > AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to > >

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, > which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also > AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to > connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to > start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is

Hi mailing list, I'm working on PXE booting a BartPE (=Windows XP) system from a server running hpa tftpd. In the initialization phase the files are requested from the boot server by TFTP, later the transfer is switched to SMB. Most of the problems during this tftp phase can be solved with the remapping feature quite nicely like: *converting filenames into absolute paths *convert

I''ve been poking around my system, and realized that having a tftp server would be handy. (I''m working with cisco routers, which have the capability to up and download configuration images via tftp.) However, I''m not content with the usual tftpd that comes with Linux. The whole "specify each directory you want" scheme is cock-eyed to me. I''d prefer

Hello, I'm trying to use a current Syslinux setup, that is working well for service linux based distros, to serve up recent Windows server installs. As I'm new here I'm reluctant to make any changes to the environment unless I've exhausted the current options. We are running Syslinux 3.71 on a Gentoo server and all the DHCP and tftpd are "working as they should". What

From: "Roy.Li" <rongqing.li at windriver.com> Add error check when write file, the caller can detect if the disk filled up (or had an i/o error) and return a NOSAPCE nak to the other side. Signed-off-by: Ming Liu <ming.liu at windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <rongqing.li at windriver.com> --- common/tftpsubs.c | 4 +++- tftpd/tftpd.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 2

I cannot seem to get the remap-file function of tftpd working right. I can sucessfully place files on the server but the remap feature is not working. I look in the logfile and it has an entry in there for tftpd. remap: input: startup-config Jan 13 21:47:50 proxy in.tftpd[25438]: remap: done Jan 13 21:47:50 proxy in.tftpd[25438]: RRQ from 192.168.0.12 filename startup-config I think that I

Hi, Without this patch, I get a "remap rules cannot be inverted" error message with any remap rule: --- tftp-hpa-0.40/tftpd/remap.c.old 2005-03-16 16:34:34.000000000 -0500 +++ tftp-hpa-0.40/tftpd/remap.c 2005-03-16 16:22:49.000000000 -0500 @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ int lineno = 0; int err = 0; + memset(this_rule, '\0', sizeof(struct rule)); while ( lineno++, fgets(line,

Hello, This about remapping in the HPA tftp server. A client does request for '/tftpboot/ncd4/foo' which should be 'ncd4/foo' I have created a remap file that looks now like this: r tftpboot/ncd4/modshmx/login.hmx ncd4/modshmx/login.hmx r tftpboot/ncd4/modshmx/setup.hmx ncd4/modshmx/setup.hmx r tftpboot/ncd4/modshmx/term.hmx ncd4/modshmx/term.hmx Because r

Hello, On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests in logfiles. On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', but nog logging. At least I can't find it them in /var/log/*/* Where does tftpd-hpa writes it's logging? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven

Hi, This is my current patch queue. The patches are independent, AFAIK, so feel free to cherry-pick or reject them independently. The bottom one was needed for a successful build here; the top one contains all the modifications you requested on IRC, and more. Meanwhile I hit one of the four stray TABs in tftpd.c, and decided to get rid of them. Comments welcome. --- Ferenc Wagner (5):

Hello, Peter and others! there are some issues regarding the tftp-hpa server: 1. Running as Windows service seems to require that the application does not detach (otherwise "net start" says smth. like "could not start, the service didn't report any errors"). The attached patch adds the option "-n", which can be used to have tftpd run in foreground.

Hello all, Tested on linux 2.6.18 (Centos5) and FreeBSD 7.0. You would execute it like below (which basically makes tftp reply back with same port is listening on ) tftpd --port-range 69:69 -4 -s /tftpboot/ --- tftp-hpa-0.49/tftpd/tftpd.c 2008-10-21 01:08:31.000000000 +0300 +++ tftp-hpa-0.49-tftpd-reuseport.c 2010-03-03 15:19:26.000000000 +0200 @@ -524,6 +524,11 @@ #ifndef __CYGWIN__

Hi, I have been running TFTPD server for 3 weeks and performed about 100 deployments. After that, TFTPD started throwing the follwing errotrs in /var/log/messages Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server tftpd[7146]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.allow: Too many open files Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server tftpd[7146]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.deny: Too many open files Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server

I configure the system of remote boot. Almost all was done. But one simple problem. tftp doesn't download pxelinux.0 from boot-server, in.tftpd is running at. Problem isn't in pxelinux.0, but in protocol itself. I've created test file "test" in /tftpboot and tried to download it but "Timeout occured". From /var/log/messages: Mar 27 16:32:27 dk in.tftpd[26576]:

> Correct. Like most UDP-based inetd services, tftpd is intended to be run in 'wait' mode. When the first request arrives, inetd starts the service but does not read the incoming packet (it can't, because it has no way to pass it along to the server). After that, inetd ignores that socket until the server exits. This isn't critical for tftp, but it does help to keep down the

Hi, I've been struggling with this problem for the last couple of hours and am nowhere near solving the problem. I am trying to run a tftp server in a chroot jail. Now perhaps I am being paranoid, but I would like to have it launched from within its own jail even if it supposedly does a chroot itself and runs with a parameterizable user. I downloaded the atftp-server package and tried

Hi, I have a question on tftpd on Slackware - I know this is an embedded Linux forum, but I think it still must be the appropriate place to ask. I have hpa-tftpd V0.40 on Slackware 9.1. No matter what I do, I can't get files transferred to the tftp server. I just get timeouts - no messages in /var/log/messages or in /var/log/syslog - just dealthly silence. This is the configuration line

I've got in.tftpd configured on a Fedora Linux server. The service is configured to boot printersm and sun sparcs. The printers boot fine, but there's a problem with the sparcs. When the sparc sends an initial request for a file, in.tftpd forks a process to handle it. If I do a "netstat -pan | grep tftp" I see that this forked process is listening on local address