Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches similar to: "[PATCH] [memdisk] Additional comments in memdisk.inc and postprocess.pl"
2009 Dec 07
3
[PATCH] memdisk: "safe hook" and mBFT
Two additions to MEMDISK to support OS drivers.
The "safe hook" structure ("Safe Master Boot Record INT 13h Hook Routines")
is a means for an OS driver to follow a chain of INT 13h hooks, examining
the hooks'' vendors and assuming responsibility for hook functionality along
the way. For MEMDISK, we guarantee an additional field which holds the
physical address for the
2020 Apr 15
1
Centos 7: cups-pdf Postprocessing prevented by selinux :(
Hi,
how can I make it so that printing to a cups PDF printer can successfully run
the postprocessing script I specified in /etc/cups/cups-pdf.conf?
It does work with 'sentenforce permissve', and after creating and installing
some selinux modules from audit.log entries, it still doesn't work, and there
doesn't seem to be anything else that might prevent the postprocessing
2016 Apr 28
4
[Bug 95190] New: Tomb Raider with PostProcessing enable and Depth of Field set to Ultra has white stuff in the foreground
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95190
Bug ID: 95190
Summary: Tomb Raider with PostProcessing enable and Depth of
Field set to Ultra has white stuff in the foreground
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
2015 Feb 19
3
[LLVMdev] [lld] Undefined symbols postprocessing
Joerg:
> I propose to add the ability to ignore undefined symbols during initial
> resolution, and then postprocess only those undefines for the second time
> after the pass manager execution.
Do you want to do that before or after dead code elimination?
I think dead code elimination should be performed after all possible object code modifications done by lld. Therefore, it should be
2015 Feb 19
4
[LLVMdev] [lld] Undefined symbols postprocessing
+ Nick
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran wrote:
> On 2/19/2015 3:58 AM, Denis Protivensky wrote:
>> Joerg:
>>> I propose to add the ability to ignore undefined symbols during initial
>>> resolution, and then postprocess only those undefines for the second
>>> time
>>> after the pass manager execution.
>> Do you want to do that before or
2015 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Undefined symbols postprocessing
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Denis Protivensky
<dprotivensky at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> Shankar,
>
> Okay, I guessed the correct interface.
> But what about the moment at which the function is called?
> If it's called from Resolver::resolve(), it doesn't make any difference to
> me as I cannot determine the need of specific symbols at that time.
>
> -
2015 Feb 18
6
[LLVMdev] [lld] Undefined symbols postprocessing
Hi everyone,
In lld, I need to conditionally add symbols (like GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE)
during
static linking because they may be used by relocations (R_ARM_TLS_IE32) or
by some other stuff like STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols.
The problem is that now symbols are added in a declarative way by
specifying in ExecutableWriter::addDefaultAtoms() override.
At that stage, there's no way to determine if
2015 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Undefined symbols postprocessing
Okay, I understood that you're proposing to add all undefined symbols during the resolution step, and not try to collect extra symbols during execution and then check if some undefines left (as I originally planned).
This sounds reasonable as in any case we must have all undefines resolved in order to continue the linking process.
Concerning the implementation, why not to add this virtual
2006 Mar 10
2
unload memdisk+FreeDOS => local boot
Sensei H. Peter Anvin,
I have successfully modified/enhanced memdisk so that one can chainload a
local operating system after running diskless FreeDOS.
I would like your advice regarding the appropriate interface for invoking
this functionality.
In addition, I would like to know what steps to take so that you feel
comfortable considering including this in the standard syslinux
distribution.