similar to: CentOS4 pam_tally2 config

All, (Sorry if this is a repost, I tried without being a subscriber and saw nothing after a day, so I'm trying again after subscribing). I think this is a problem with how sshd uses PAM. Basic scenario: - sshd is configured to use PAM with pam_tally2 - Multiple clients try connecting within a small time frame - Some of the clients fail to authenticate The problem is that the tally is

Hi All, I prepared a Centos 6.8 Minimal server, as part of hardening i added PAM rules under system-auth and password-auth to lock the user account for 30 minutes after 3 failed login attempts. ############system-auth############### auth required pam_tally2.so deny=3 unlock_time=1800 auth required pam_env.so auth sufficient pam_unix.so auth requisite

WAY Off topic here, but if anyone's in the Augusta, Georgia area and wants to work as a web developer(css, html, flash, php, photoshop and the other usual goodies), we've got a job opening. If you like abuse, long hours, low pay, and lots of stress, we have the perfect job for you. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell

For those of you who are going to do the update from the centos5 beta to centos 5 proper despite the warnings, this is a(n incomplete) list of instructions for how to accomplish this 1. Get yourself into runlevel 3 (telinit 3 from terminal) as the dbus update will die if you're in X. 2. Setenforce 0 # turn off selinux as there have been some unconfirmed reports that it will interfere with the

Does anybody use tripwire on centos 5? Has anybody checked that: http://www.linickx.com/archives/281/tripwire-2411-rpm-for-centos-redhat-rhel-4 on centos5? M. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi guys, So, I've been a long-term user of LLVM, and currently me and my students are actively using LLVM in several projects of ours. At this point, I would greatly appreciate if you could add SMACK static checker, which relies on LLVM, to the list of LLVM projects. SMACK is an open-source static checker built on top of LLVM, and we are hoping to get more collaborators and contributors this

On Feb 6, 2013, at 7:22 AM, "Criswell, John T" <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > > We can add a link to the SMACK project on the LLVM User's page at http://llvm.org/Users.html at any time. Bill, does your comment refer to the release notes, or something else? > Just to the release notes. At least, that's when we do blurbs. :) -bw > In any

Hello, I have configured a Nagios server to be part of a Windows 2003 domain. The Linux server is RedHat 5.3 with winbind version 3.0.22. The configuration is using kerberos and pam with winbind to support Windows user and local account. Everything is working fine until we test the active directory failover. The system is still accessible through domain account but it's very slow and the

Dear All, We can add a link to the SMACK project on the LLVM User's page at http://llvm.org/Users.html at any time. Bill, does your comment refer to the release notes, or something else? In any event, if the SMACK project has a web site, I can add the URL to the User's page. Is the Github URL what you want to use, or is there a web page with more information that we should link to

Thanks Bill! So should I email you again in 5 months? -- http://www.zvonimir.info On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Zvonimir, > > We normally list projects that use LLVM when we do a release. The next release will be 3.3, which will probably start up in 5 months or so. > > -bw > > On Feb 3, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Zvonimir

Hi Zvonimir, We normally list projects that use LLVM when we do a release. The next release will be 3.3, which will probably start up in 5 months or so. -bw On Feb 3, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Zvonimir Rakamaric <zvonimir at cs.utah.edu> wrote: > Hi guys, > > So, I've been a long-term user of LLVM, and currently me and my > students are actively using LLVM in several projects of

Dear Alexey, Yes I am sure that the llvm, clang and compiler-rt are synced to the same version. I downloaded them all from git http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#git-mirror I think I need compiler-rt for my project but I'll verify it again to see if I can proceed without it. You are correct that compiler-rt is compiled with the just built clang. The complete command that gives an error

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Pranav Garg <pranav.garg2107 at gmail.com>wrote: > Dear Alexey, > > Yes I am sure that the llvm, clang and compiler-rt are synced to the same > version. I downloaded them all from git > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#git-mirror > I think I need compiler-rt for my project but I'll verify it again to see > if I can proceed

yes I think that is correct. I wrote a simple program to print if sizeof(uintptr_t) != sizeof(unsigned char *) and when I compile with gcc -m64 and execute it on a 64-bit host (that is different from the 32-bit laptop on which I originally compiled the program), it says the sizes are not equal. Thanks Pranav On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:

Hi, Our tool SMACK (https://github.com/smackers/smack/) relies on installing LLMV from APT packages that used to be provided here: http://llvm.org/apt/ This link has been down for several weeks at this point (I think). Do you have a rough estimate for when you will bring this back? Our users are having trouble installing SMACK due to the above problem, and so I am wondering if we should look

Hi, So, SMACK is a software verifier based around LLVM, and you can find more info (PDF, title, abstract) about our recent publication here: http://soarlab.org/2014/05/smack-decoupling-source-language-details-from-verifier-implementations/ I would appreciate if you could add it to your list of LLVM-based publications. Thanks! Best, -- Zvonimir -- http://zvonimir.info http://soarlab.org/

Hi Pranav, On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Pranav Garg <pranav.garg2107 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I see that ENABLE_WERROR is being set to off (the default value) in the > config.log in the llvm build. However on grepping for WERROR in the > compiler-rt folder I get the following output: > > pranav at pranav:~/smack-project/llvm-3.4/src/projects/compiler-rt$ grep

Hi, I am trying to build llvm along with clang and compiler-rt. When I run make, I am getting the following compilation error (I tried compiling llvm-3.2, which is what I need for my project, but also tried llvm-3.3 and the current llvm source from the git repository). ... COMPILE: clang_linux/full-x86_64/x86_64:

Hi, I see that ENABLE_WERROR is being set to off (the default value) in the config.log in the llvm build. However on grepping for WERROR in the compiler-rt folder I get the following output: pranav at pranav:~/smack-project/llvm-3.4/src/projects/compiler-rt$ grep -Rin WERROR * lib/asan/tests/CMakeLists.txt:38: -Werror lib/asan/asan_malloc_mac.cc:253:// This function is currently unused, and we

On 25/06/16 21:48, mj wrote: > > > On 06/25/2016 06:32 PM, Mark Foley wrote: >> I think I've read something on this before, but I can't seem to find it. > As far as we know, this is impossible. :-( > > It a feature we would also VERY much like to see, for exactly the same > reason. > > MJ > never actually tried this, but couldn't you use pam_tally