similar to: Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c2c6d8ced889948d7a52fbbb577ec2ff bind-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm 0c66970cb9b1b46e7f8210c638134ba7 bind-chroot-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c56c92553eb90170033acee5bb59452b bind-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.i386.rpm b29a740114dad7c05298c3d918d58d9f bind-chroot-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.i386.rpm

Hello, we have a mixed environment at work: CentOS + Win2003 servers. The Win2k3 part contains: AD, DNS (inlc. dyndns), DHCP, DFS, Exchange. The CentOS part: NIS passwords + also a DNS server. So currently we have to update the Linux DNS server zone infos by hand: I export a text file from Windows DNS server and then edit it around using vim. On the Windows side however it's easy for me to

Seeing upstream has an update for glibc http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0052.html I rebuilt the glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.src.rpm and it produced the following rpms :- glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-common-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-debuginfo-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-debuginfo-common-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm

Dear All, I have the following setup running perfectly OK for a long time CentOS release 5 (Final) sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 MailScanner 4.76.25 bind-9.3.4-6.0.3.P1.el5_2 now i jus setup a centos box running BackupPC for backing up my my above mail server using ssh as per the instructions in backup pc site i had to enable sshd so i did it and everthing works perfect and backup works great as per my

I had a 5.0 kickstart server which did "core" installs of CentOS (i.e.: "%packages --nobase"). I recently setup a 5.2 kickstart server. Using the same kickstart configs, I notice a few packages are always missing, notably: yum (!!), selinux-policy-targeted (even though I have "selinux --enforcing" in the kickstart, it always ends up with that package missing and

Hello fellow CentOS'ers- I've got a system running CentOS 5.0. The motherboard has two onboard SATA ports with two drives attached. I installed the system on a RAID1 setup. However, I'd like to add a hotspare disk to the array. Since there are no additional SATA ports, I've installed an additional controller. After partitioning, the additional drive was easily and successfully

In doing an update of centos 5.2 this morning, I observed that the old gecko-libs dependency issue caused yum update to fail because it was required by nspluginwrapper (x64_86), devhelp, yelm and firefox. Also, a firefox (x64_86) showed the red hat splash screen rather than centos. Manual installation of affected rpms using --nodeps (I don't advise this) did not apear to impair the

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0967 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0967.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 6501c1e582d31facd53dd63391f5e86f httpd-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.x86_64.rpm 31fb222701a58a20254d4db035fcd873 httpd-devel-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm

Greetings all- Over the years, I've become incredibly spoiled by 'packages.debian.org' which allows me to search for a package, view it's description, download it, see dependencies, see similar packages, etc... Does such a site or resource exist for CentOS? Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0967 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0967.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 2d0f8e04f56bbc5dcb3a0fb64a74e89a httpd-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm 4785cfd30d6cb160beb48199382fb241 httpd-devel-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi, I have a problem with a package I have developed in that functions do not get loaded due to older versions of the functions being in the .GlobalEnv? fetched from .Rdata files stored from previous saved workspaces. I need to be able to fix this somehow when I load the package. I do not want to mess up the search order to fix the problem. How I got myself into this mess is that I started

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0818 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0818.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 12ed57905be0034361f4357f7ebfb580 postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.i386.rpm 5f45b128714174964caf8b5633d9723f postfix-pflogsumm-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.i386.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0818 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0818.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: cfcd76e57b844ea28a53de43f9262cb4 postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm 7bebb4b9264b5ceac8c736c75a95155b postfix-pflogsumm-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm

Hi, I've seen that some packages use .packageName internally to infer their own name. Is that officially supported? I could not find it documented anywhere. There's utils::packageName(), which internally looks for .packageName. However, if the latter is not found, it may return NULL whereas an error would be more appropriate if a package name is expected. Using .packageName would give

Hi, i want to use Puppet to install all packages from a webserver (no repository) . Therefore I wrote following Script: class install_package { case "$operatingsystem" { SLES: { notify {"${operatingsystem} ${operatingsystemrelease} detected":} notify {"Installing $packagename now:":}

Greetings CentOS Team- Since the list tends to be filled with "things don't work" and "why did you do it this way" and "complaint X", I thought I'd make a small deviation... I have a production system running on a Dell Poweredge 2650 server. I simply ran 'yum update' and rebooted with no problems. Everything continues to work as rock solid as before.

Hi All, I am encountering the following error while performing check on the R package we built: R CMD check packagename_0.99.0.tar.gz During startup - Warning message: Setting LC_CTYPE failed, using "C" * using R Under development (unstable) (2013-05-14 r62742) * using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit) * using session charset: ASCII * checking for file

> Am 16.12.2018 um 00:07 schrieb Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > > On 12/15/18 1:05 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> Ultimately it would be very useful to have some kind of a tool that would generate a report from the rpms installed on a system and tell you exactly what depends on what else. Among other things you could use that report to remove stuff that's not