similar to: samsung sata disk pb

Can someone please explain what's wrong here. And how to solve it. I run CentOS-4.1 MSI K8N Neo Platinum Athlon 3000 Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 S-ATA disc [root at amd64 kai]# /sbin/hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 2808 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1402.81 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads:

The file are there: http://thdei.info/results.zip and http://thdei.info/mos_6_MOS-USA_Test-114_20060605-042551cut-PESQ.png because, last time I put them in attachment and the mail was waiting for approvement and I never see it anmore . ________________________________ From: Deillon Thomas-WTD008 Sent: 05 June 2006 14:32 To: 'asterisk-users@lists.digium.com' Subject: Quality of Asterisk

> Hello Everyone, > > Since rebooting my Centos 6.10 Openvz server "daisy" yesterday, I am > getting horrible system performance.? /var/log/messages is full of > HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for /dev/sdb.? The latest entries look like this: > > Apr 22 08:51:32 daisy kernel: [141224.655699] CT: 1005: stopped > Apr 22 08:55:04 daisy ata_id[21513]: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY

Correct, 3ware 9670SE SATA-II Raid PCIe [root at daisy dev]# lspci 00:00.0 Memory controller: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3) 00:01.1 SMBus: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB controller: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) 00:02.1 USB controller: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB

At the present moment, my guest is running inside qemu and host is kvm intel, running Ubuntu 14.04, kernel is 4.3.0 stable. From within the guest, when I run "hdparm -i /dev/sdb" on the guest, I get: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument as the error,but on the host, I will get the full harddisk/SSD info. Can I know how to resolve this so that the output is the same for both

>> Hello Everyone, >> >> Since rebooting my Centos 6.10 Openvz server "daisy" yesterday, I am >> getting horrible system performance.? /var/log/messages is full of >> HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for /dev/sdb.? The latest entries look like >> this: >> >> Apr 22 08:51:32 daisy kernel: [141224.655699] CT: 1005: stopped >> Apr 22 08:55:04

Dear All, I have succesfully managed to have my kerberos configured n working without error when i say kinit Administrator and after entering password it works fine my krb5.conf -------------- [logging] default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log [libdefaults] default_realm = BALADIA.LOCAL dns_lookup_kdc = false

Hello Everyone, Since rebooting my Centos 6.10 Openvz server "daisy" yesterday, I am getting horrible system performance.? /var/log/messages is full of HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for /dev/sdb.? The latest entries look like this: Apr 22 08:51:32 daisy kernel: [141224.655699] CT: 1005: stopped Apr 22 08:55:04 daisy ata_id[21513]: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for '/dev/sdb' Apr 22

Dear All, this i feel is a little out of topic but really apprecite if someone can help i am tryin to authenicate my Centos 5.2 box to windows 2003 ADS server .. but am not able to do so . i get the following error when i run kinit kinit(v5): Improper format of Kerberos configuration file while initializing Kerberos 5 library i have the following packages installed on my linux box [root at

Dear All, I have been using -- shorewall-4.0.14-1 on Centos 5.2 and its been working just great. i would like to monitor shorewall traffic ( i mean the allowed and dropped traffic passing through my firewall )with a browser from any location apprecite if someone could help me or advice me which software or add on utility would do the above. really apprecite thanks nd regards simon

For the inspection of the docs group: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/IdentifyHardDisk Phil

Hi there: As suggested in the docs, I am forwarding a bug report. I have just converted two partitions to ext3 from ext2 without reformatting on my home box. All is not well, however. Here's the specs AMD K6/2-3D 500 Mhz, 64MB SDRAM, 100 Mhz bus Via Apollo P5MPV3 chipset, 100 Mhz bus Opti Mad 16 931 soundcard Video= AGP S3 Trio, w/8MB RAM, PS/2 mouse. Realtek 8029 pci bus network card.

Move all the dependencies with the same name in all the distributions to a single list at the end. There should be no change to the package list used to build the p2v ISO. --- p2v/dependencies.m4 | 72 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/p2v/dependencies.m4 b/p2v/dependencies.m4 index 21541b4..e590f57 100644 ---

In my haste for help, I stupidly hit reply and changed the subject which I thought was enough for a new message, not giving much thought for the threading, etc. So apologies for the hijack, although I would think it fairly obvious that it wasn't deliberate or obvious to me... or a big deal really. My mail doesn't thread. Some further info for those actually interested in helping, I forgot

After booting into Linux 2.6.18-8.1.3.el5xen #> hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 10512 MB in 1.98 seconds = 5306.82 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 210 MB in 3.02 seconds = 69.58 MB/sec Then I start a domu with the command: #>xm create <domainname> This domain uses file based Virtual block devices. And now the hard drive performance goes down

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: >> DBAN is obsolete. NIST 800-88 for some time now says to use secure erase >> or enhanced security erase or crypto erase if supported. >> >> Other options do not erase data in remapped sectors. > > dban doesn't? What F/OSS does "secure erase"? And does it do

Hi all, When I ran the experiments to compare an application''s execution time in both a domU (named cctest1) and a native Linux machine (named ccn10), I noticed the application executes faster in domU. The host of the domU (named ccn9) and ccn10 are two nodes of a cluster and they have same hardware configurations. domU (cctest1) is created by exporting loopback files from dom0 on

Hdparm didn?t get far: [root at r1k1 ~] # hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: Alarm clock [root at r1k1 ~] # On 2016-05-25, 2:44 PM, "Kelly Lesperance" <klesperance at blackberry.com> wrote: >The HBA is an HP H220. > >We haven?t really benchmarked individual drives ? all 12 drives are utilized in one RAID-10 array, I?m unsure how we would test

I believe I've posted before about one of the speed issues we were having, of backups taking many, many hours that should *not* take that long. My manager and I finally nailed it down to the h/d itself. Identical boxes, and he tried a backup of one system which took under two hours, while the same regular one rand nearly six. I'd been googling on and off for weeks, and this morning, ran

I need to disable the spin-down on an external USB drive because it spins down spontaneously while in use. The drive forgets the spindown-disable state across power outage so I need to reissue the hdparm command with each boot or hotplug. Where should I put the hdparm command to do this?