similar to: validates_peresence_of

Hi all, i''m trying to email multiple people based on certain criteria. i do a search like @stacks = Group.find(:all, :conditions => ["component_id = ?", 2]) this populates stack to contain multiple groups with component_id =2. How do i populate @recipients to contain all possible @stack.email. Let me clearify. Each stack has its own email, and i need to include each

>Comment By: Luis Lavena (luislavena) > Date: 2007-05-04 23:37 > describe "An Asset" do > before(:each) do > @asset = Asset.new > end > > it { @asset.should have_one(:attachment) } > it { @asset.should have_present(:something) } > end Food for thought on these. I like have_one a lot. It speaks to me as a Rails developer and I think it speaks to

Does any one know how to comment out code in a controller (.rb file) Thanks, Yng -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all, I just begun with RoR and going through the Agile development w Rails depot example ATM. I did everything according to the book (i believe), and after 3 hours of googling, reading docs, making sure i did everything correctly i can not make the validate_presence_of() to work - at least not as it looks in the book. My Product model looks like: class Product < ActiveRecord::Base

Is it possible to change error messages for Validation helpers? I am writing an app against a existing database (so no control over column names), but when there is validation error (e.g. with validate_presence_of) I would like to customize the field name. For example for telephone whose field name is PhoneNumber I would like to chnage it to "Telephone Number cannot be empty" rather

hello, i am writing a simple user login system. when registering a user account, i have two field: password password_confirmation which are validated using validates_presence_of validates_confirmation_of and these are then used to generate a password hash which is stored in my database when i want to update the record (without changing the password and entering new values for password and

I could be going mad and missing something really obvious here but I''m getting an unexpected result from the following. The schema: create_table :services, :force => true do |t| t.column :id, :primary_key t.column :name, :string, :ilmit => 5, :null => false t.column :port, :integer, :null => false t.column :status, :string end The model: class Service <

Hi all, I''m trying to validate a data field. I''ve added ''validate_presence_of :name'' to the record model, but when I try to create a record i get an error complaining that it can''t find data from another table that also is updated on that page. Let me explain further, On my ''record'' update page, I have data from another table

I am using rails edge. I am using gem "rspec-rails", "= 2.0.0.beta. 19" . I have following code at spec/models/user_spec.rb require ''spec_helper'' describe User do it { should validate_presence_of(:email) } it { should validate_presence_of(:name) } end Here is my gemfile group :development, :test do gem ''factory_girl_rails'',

I have a rather complex object with a number of attributes. For a variety of reasons, I would like one view to create the object with only a couple of fields completed, then a second and third view to finish all the fields. I would like the model to validate_presence_of all these fields, since eventually I need them all there, and I would like each page to validate its portion of the fields that

Hi, guys, I''m learning to use Rails, and, while reading the "Rails: Up And Running" book, I tried to make an insertion validation, using the following code: class Photo < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :filename end It simply didn''t work, the validation does nothing and an insertion with an empty field returns TRUE. What''s wrong?

Last night a friend of mine started ranting about validates_presence_of :boolean_field returning not valid when the boolean field is false. I checked the rails issues and this seems to be a pretty common concern about the naming of ''presence'' . Instead of changing the behaviour of the presence validator, I was wondering if maybe the answer to avoid such misconceptions could be

I have a model that contains a :boolean field. In my view, I have a simple select of Yes or No, which equates to true or false, respectively. If I choose yes and save, everything works great. If I choose no, my model fails validation as I have this set as a required field using validates_presence_of. I have checked the log and it''s definitely set to false, why would this fail validation?

i''m using gem Remarkable activerecord for association. i''ve installed remarkable and remarkable activerecrod both gem. i''ve added both gem in my Gemfile. i''ve added "remarkable_activerecord" as required in spec_helper.rb. describe Authentication do FactoryGirl.build(:authentication).should belong_to(:user)

Hi, If I set the p.adjust="none", does it meant that the output p values from the pairwise.t.test will be the same as those from individual t.tests (set var.equal=T, alternative="t")? I actually got different p values from the two tests. See below. Is it supposed to be this way? Thanks Johnny > x [1] 61.6 52.7 61.3 65.2 62.8 63.7 64.8 58.7 44.9 57.0 64.3 55.1 50.0 41.0

I''m trying to assign a parent foreign key value using collection_select from my child "new" form. The problem I''m having is if I do not make a selection, I get the following error instead of the Rails validates_presence_of error: You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occurred while evaluating

I can''t seem to figure out how to validate a few fields some1 please help me out model--------- class Record < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :sw, :flex end controller------------ class RecordController < A;;icationController def new @record = Rrecord.new @product = Product.find(params[''product_id'']) end def create

hypothetical question for all you BDD experts: I want to make sure that a :list action always returns widgets in alphabetical order. There''s at least 2 ways of doing this: it "should fetch items in alphabetical order" do Widget.should_receive(:find).with(:order => "name ASC") get :list end it "should fetch items in alphabetical order" do [:red,

If I have belongs_to :user Do I need to have validates_presence_of :user_id ? Does Rails validate the presence of :user_id automatically if I have belongs_to :user? In other words, does Rails prevent against creating orphan records that belong to non-existent users? Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m trying to ''destroy'' a particular record of a table >From the controller side, i''ve found a list of possible records that i want deleted. ie. @chart = Chart.find(:all, :conditions => ["record_id = ?", param[''id''] ] ''id'' is passed into the controller and @chart is all the possible records that have