Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Props to Mongrel/Zed"
2006 Jun 26
2
RailsConf DVD ?
Hi All,
I saw spurious mentions on a few blogs of a DVD being made available of
RailsConf presentations. However none seemed to have a who/what/when/where
attached to them, thus might just be pure speculation. Anyone know of an
official source/effort being made for a DVD?
Would be well keen for copy if one is to be made available....
Cheers
Rowan
---
http://raili.st/
-------------- next part
2006 Jul 10
10
Problem using Feedtools on my Rails project!
Hi
I''m trying to setup my app to use Feedtools amazing RSS powers, but it
fails miserably on the following line:
logger.debug("Description:#{FeedTools::Feed.open("http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot").items.first.description}")
The stack trace says:
wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
2006 Apr 03
12
scgi?? do i need it for ruby?
This might be obvious to everyone but it is something that i haven''t
been able to find an answer to. Do I need to have either
scgi/fastcgi/cgi running on either lighttpd/apache for ruby scripts to
work? If yes, why? I have installed the scgi server and i can get the
service to run, i have also installed the following mod_fastcgi/2.4.2
mod_ruby/1.2.4 Ruby/1.8.2(2004-12-25) mod_scgi,
2006 Mar 04
5
Correcting Bent Records: Mongrel is not SCGI
Hi,
I kept getting a very weird question about Mongrel
(http://mongrel.rubyforge.org) and SCGI that I think really needs to be
cleared up:
** Mongrel is not SCGI and will never need, use, require, or interact with
SCGI (unless someone wants to write the handler for it). **
For some reason people have been under the impression that Mongrel actually
uses or interacts with my other project SCGI
2005 Oct 17
12
SCGI Rails Runner 0.4.1 (getting closer)
Hi All,
Alright, this release is getting closer. It''s nearly complete except
the docs on my site aren''t written yet. There is however a full README
with RDoc documentation and several packages including a gem release.
Please check out the latest release at:
* Announcement:
http://www.zedshaw.com/
* README and RDoc:
2005 Nov 15
11
Collecting thread: Too many open files (Rails+SCGI crash)
I have a problem with running Rails 0.13.1 with scgi_rails 0.4.3 and
Apache. After running for some time (more than a day), the SCGI
process stops with the following error (from scgi.log):
--
[ERR][24189] Collecting thread: Too many open files
[ERR][24189] /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/scgi_rails-0.4.3/lib/scgi.rb:188:in
`accept''
2006 Feb 23
5
Running apps in subdirectories using lighty/scgi
Hi,
So thanks to Zed I was able to get lighty/scgi and a Rails app running.
I know this might not be the best place to post this, but I guessed
there may be several others with similar experiences here.
So, the following step is to have several apps each in its on
subdirectory. I tried the following to no avail:
$HTTP["url"] =~ "^/tango/" {
server.document-root =
2006 Jan 11
10
Recommend server for developing RoR on win
Hi all,
can you recommend me which web server config to use for developing rails
on windows machine. I tried webrick, which is good but it''s annoying
because console window is in taskbar for every site running and it have
to be started manually. Apache with CGI is to slow and using FastCGI on
the other side brings me lot of problems, like randomly not working RoR
sites.
Any help is
2006 Jan 30
5
SCGI Rails Runner RubyForge Project
Hello Rails Folks,
This is just a quick announcement to let people know that SCGI Rails
Runner now has a RubyForge project at:
http://rubyforge.org/projects/scgi/
There''s already a few bug and feature requests there and I''ll be
quickly putting more docs online as well as a new release shortly.
The latest source is checked into subversion if you are interested in
2006 Feb 23
5
Help with SCGI please :(
Hi,
While learning Ruby and Rails, I decided I just as well learn Linux
along the way... It''s been fun, but I''m stuck at one of those
exasperating moments... I hope someone can help me :)
I installed Ruby 1.8.4 on Fedora Core 4, then Rails, then lighty, and
then SCGI.
I used yum to install lighty... and it already comes with mod_scgi.
I created my first application in
2006 Jan 31
11
Mongrel HTTP Library 0.2.0 (Fast And RubyForgified)
Hi Everyone,
I''m happy to announce the 0.2.0 release of Mongrel -- the fastest
HTTP 1.1 library Ruby has yet.
http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ -- ruby docs lame page.
http://rubyforge.org/projects/mongrel/ -- project page.
Special thanks to Tom Copland for setting up my RubyForge goodness,
and to Why for kicking in time to get the Camping examples up to snuff.
This release should
2005 Oct 19
35
Why you MUST use SCGI for Rails development
Hello happy Railers,
I used to develop with a local out-of-the-box Apache and load times were
pretty slow (like a few seconds each page). "Well, it''s the price to
pay for no compile / cache / etc..." I thought. Nonsense. Yesterday I
installed SCGI, and now I''ve got the best of both worlds: rails
development env uses my very latest modifications, while SCGI ensures I
2006 May 10
7
mongrel vs. scgi
I''ve liked the scgi runner ever since it came out. I like the way it''scontrolled, the way it''s clusterable, and the fact that it runs onwin32 platforms so easily.
Now it''s May 2006, and the scgi runner hasn''t changed since October,and now we have mongrel. I keep seeing hints of clustering in mongrel,as well. I just downloaded the win32 installer for
2005 Dec 28
11
some notes about rails, apache, fastcgi and windows
hello.
i''d like to share some feelings of mine after a couple of *weeks*
intermittent attempts to have rails applications working on windows
(XP) with fastcgi performances under apache (2.0).
i''d say the software stack i''m using now will be fairly common as more
and more new rails developers will join the bandwagon.
what is stunning me is the fact that, even if
2006 Mar 09
13
Apache or lighttp for Ror/2003server?
160,000 pages
99% static, only minor stuff done in rail (search, contact us, etc.)
windows server 2003
Ror 1.0
Currently 30K Hits /day on IIS.
Apache or Lighttp? Fast_CGI seems kinda slow with a 2003/Apache
configuration.
The only thing I''ll get rid of for sure is IIS.
-Cedric
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2005 Jun 18
9
lighthttpd mod_scgi
I see that lighttpd 1.3.14 supports SCGI.
lighttpd 1.3.14 - 2005-06-15 18:10
Changes
-------
* added SCGI support via mod_scgi
* added hash-based and round-robin load balancing to mod_proxy
* fixed range requests larger than 2Gb
* fixed compilation on Solaris
* fixed endless loops in mod_fastcgi, mod_cgi and mod_proxy
* fixed handling of URIs for ''+'' and
2005 Dec 01
12
Difficult process of restarting SCGI, Lighttpd, Apache, sessions
I''ve managed to get Rails working using Apache->Lighttpd->SCGI. Restarting everything is really
difficult. This appears to be the process:
- stop apache
- stop lighttpd
- stop scgi
- make sure scgi still isn''t running (it sometimes does) - if it is, kill it
- delete all session files (they often cause permission errors)
- start scgi
- start apache
- start lighttpd
- cross
2006 Jul 28
4
SCGI + Rails at System Startup
All of the documentation for scgi_ctrl says to run it from your Rails
app directory, and I can''t get it to run from a single command line like
you would in a system startup script.
I''ve tried:
scgi_ctrl -c /www/myapp/config/scgi.yaml start
...but that just errors out unless I run it from within the root of my
rails app (/www/myapp).
--
Posted via
2005 Dec 04
10
web server q -- playing nice w/ PHP
I have a webserver that''s happily running apache2 and PHP. I''d like to
deploy a site that I wrote using RoR on that same server but read that
there might be some conflicts with PHP and RoR trying to access the same
MySQL database.
How real are those conflicts? Could I mess up my running PHP site if I
install mod_ruby and try to use Apache2?
Would I be better off
2006 May 22
1
configuring apache with scgi
i had been trying for weeks to get fcgi to play right with apache. i
finally got it working, but it''s far from stable. it was recommended to
me that i should try using SCGI and that it is much easier to set up.
being new to this stuff though, i''m not sure if there''s a lack of
documentation or if there are some things that are just assumed and not
known by a noob