similar to: -Infinity for Doule type column

Hi list. I''m using Ubuntu distro. for rails development. Today, to my disappoint, I''ve found that there''re certainly almost no mysql frontend which runs very well. (1) mysql-query-browser: Seems to be very nice. But, it quickly exits when I press ctrl+enter or modify a table structure. Something strange is happening here, but I can not figure out what it is. (2)

I'm running into problems trying to use the nls function to fit the some data. I'm invoking nls using nls(s~k/(a+r)^b, start=list(k=1, a=13, b=0.59)) but I get errors indicating that the step has been reduced below the minimum step size or an inifinity is generated in numericDeriv. I've tried to use a variety of starting values for a, b, k but get similar errors. Is there

Chris Lattner wrote: >Could you try compiling and running this program: > >--- >#include <limits> >#include <iostream> >int main() { > std::cerr << std::numeric_limits<float>::infinity() << "\n"; >} >--- > > Sure thing. It prints "0". Calling that inifinity is somewhat of a stretch, isn't it ? What on earth

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Finn S Andersen wrote: > Chris wrote in a followup: > > > Can you send the output of 'llc -o - foo.bc -debug -print-machineinstrs'? > > > Attached as "linscan". (But added the "-regalloc=linearscan" to provoke > the error). Yes, that's exactly what I meant... thanks for reading my mind! :) It looks like this is where

OK, details: I run RH8 (gcc 3.2.something), RH9 (gcc 3.2.2-5) and Fedora. Problems are the same across all setups. Hardware is Athlon 1600+ and half a giga RAM. Runs fail with an assertion when the linear scan allocator is enabled, but runs without problems otherwise. On RH9 (the system I have access to while generating this email) I have the following details: > 1) The LLVM assembly

Hi, Andras, Thanks for the comments. Yes, I am aware of those issues. I probably should have been more accurate on my usage of terms. Actually in my project, the unit collection is a mixture of diphones and words. However seems to me, these synthesizer specific issue is irrelevant to my question about speex. As you said, i merely use speex as storage methods. All I ask for is to get the

Ok, let me first explain why 5ms matters, even they are 0's, in my particular application. I am working on a speech synthesis system. The basic idea is concatenating pre-recorded phonemes or words into longer sentences. So any missing or extra samples, even it is as short as 5~10ms, cause very noticeable discontinuities. I want to use speex to compress/decompress those pre-recorded

[At the risk of educating you about something you might already know] Natural speech in most human languages gradually changes from one phoneme to the next. Concatenating phonemes together from a fixed, prerecorded, unflexible set would give rise to abrupt changes between them (both in phoneme quality and in pitch), and thus make the resulting speech hard to understand and/or uncomfortable

According to the AppDB, the Infinity Combat Prototype works perfectly. Unfortunately, when I try to run it, it freezes when it tries to load OpenAL. I've tried installing the OpenAL stuff linked to on the DB entry: no effect. Stderr shows nothing useful when running it and running it with WINEDEBUG=+openal32 shows nothing more.

Hi, I am trying to fit a sigmoid curve to some data with nls but I am getting into some trouble. Seems that the optimization method is getting down to some parameter estimates that make the equation unsolvable. This is an example: >growth<-data.frame(Time=c(5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27),BodyMass=c(45,85,125,210,300,485,570,700,830,940,1030,1120))

I have to calculate some formula like: gamma(x)/(gamma(x+y) and I observed that for relatively big values of x, R returns infinity and so cannot compute the formula. Is it possible to force R to give the real value of gamma(x) instead of Inf ? thanks

Hi r-users, How do we evaluate the summation of (1/m!) from 0 to infinity (for example). Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you.

Hello everyone, I am looking into time series data compression at the moment. The idea is to fit a curve on a time series of n points so that the maximum deviation on any of the points is not greater than a given threshold. In other words, none of the values that the curve takes at the points where the time series is defined, should be "further away" than a certain threshold from the

This doesn't seem to be happening on MacOS, neither in Terminal nor RStudio, (R 3.5.1, R-devel, R-patched). So probably Windows specific. -pd > On 7 Feb 2019, at 11:17 , David Byrne <david.byrne222 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Bug > Using read.table(file, encoding="UTF-8") to import a UTF-8 encoded > file containing the infinity symbol (' ? ') results in

sorry the integration was from -Inf to 1.96 The integrate function in R is not taking Inf (infinity). How do you use infinity in R. I was doing: integrate(dnorm,- Inf, 1.96) and I was getting Error: NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 2). Obviously this should be equal to pnorm(1.96)= 0.9750021. How do you get around the infinity problem in R?

There seems to be something odd with "?" on Windows (and not only with read.table) In native encoding (cp-1252 in my case), "?" gets converted to "8" x <- "?" Encoding(x) #> [1] "unknown" print(x) #> [1] "8" charToRaw(x) #> [1] 38 "?" is indeed "8" identical(x, "8") #> [1] TRUE Everything

I'd like to be able to modify axlab in (C) below so that 'Inf' is replaced by the infinity symbol. y <- rnorm(40) breaks <- c(-Inf, -1, 1, Inf) x <- cut(y, breaks=breaks) plot(unclass(x), y, xaxt="n", xlab="") ## A: The following gives the axis labels "(-Inf, 1]", etc. axis(1, at=1:3, labels=expression("(-Inf,-1]", "(-1,1]",

Hi, I am a non-expert user of R. I am essaying the fit of two different functions to my data, but I receive two different error messages. I suppose I have two different problems here... But, of which nature? In the first instance I did try with some different starting values for the parameters, but without success. If anyone could suggest a sensible way to proceed to solve these I would be

This seems like such an obvious idea that I''m having trouble believing I''m the first to think of it. Why not take ranges containing Float::INFINITY and translate them to the appropriate greater than or less than comparisons? Example: class Person scope :voters, -> { where(born_on: (-Float::INFINITY..18.years.ago)) } end This would generate something along the lines of

Tomas, > In my scenario, the conversion is invoked by RGui before returning the input to the main R loop, even before the input gets to the parser. In principle, we could change this particular conversion in RGui to avoid the substitution. Not sure whether I am missing something here, but I used RStudio for my examples (I should have said) and David's mentioned RStudio as well, so it does