similar to: bce and lagg revisited

Greetings- I'd like to configure multiple copper NICs on a server running CentOS 6.2 in a LAGG configuration for better throughput to the core switch. After quite a bit of searching, I'm not seeing anything of the sort. Is LAGG specific to the BSD world and the HP switches I'm running? Or, does it go by a different name? Bonding perhaps? If so, is bonding compatible with LAGG? --Tim

On 07/08/12 17:00, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:34:43 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Configure LAGG Interface? > To: centos at centos.org > Message-ID: <50201C53.2070300 at uni-x.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Am 06.08.2012 19:44, schrieb

Hi. I'm looking at a qlogic qle2462 hba for my dl360 g5. The thread http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable@freebsd.org/msg99497.html mentions a deadlock when system is loaded. Has this issue been resolved? Are there other PCI Express hba's which are known to work with freebsd stable and dl360 g5? -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is

i'm running on vmware system and HP proliant DL360 G5 servers on wmware, on boot i have the following message: ----------------------------- Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" [OK] ----------------------------- and on a HP proliant DL360 G5 server , on boot i have too the following message: ----------------------------- Applying

I am running NUT as part of FreeNAS 9.2.0. I have looked through the manuals, but I don't see how to address my issue. The box has 4 NIC's in a LACP LAGG group. It takes a while for LACP to finish, and NUT tries to start before packets are flowing. NUT will complain endlessly about communication errors and never establish SNMP communication with my APC UPS. If I stop NUT and restart

Hello All, Has anyone tried using a HP DL360 G5 with the Advanced iSCSI license? Cheers Tim _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello. Recently I've ran into problems with HP Proliant booting off the network with menu.c32. Configuration -- several identical servers: HP Proliant DL360 G5 HP Bios P58 12/26/2006 Bootblock 09/18/2006 HP SmartArray E200i Controller (128MB, v1.20) Broadcom NetXtreme II Ethernet Boot Agent v2.8.5 When localboot is chosen from menu.c32 menu I get standard "PXE-M0F Exiting ...",

Hello * this morning I tried to upgrade from pxelinux 3.11 to 3.84 and discovered that the localboot stuff does not work on HP DL360 G3 and G5. The latest syslinux Version I found with a working localboot is 3.36. pxelinux.cfg/default: default harddisk prompt 1 label harddisk localboot 0 implicit 0 timeout 250 This so simple, it should just work, shouldn't it? The

Hi, I''m trying to boot a HP dl360 G5 from via iSCSI from a solaris 10 u4 zfs device but it''s failing the login at boot: POST messages from the dl360: Starting iSCSI boot option rom initialization... Connecting.connected. Logging in...error - failing. Interestingly (and correctly) the authentication method is set to none. I''ve looked at a TCP capture and the box

Any tips on solving the following performance conundrum: Asterisk 1.8.12.2 running on HP DL360 G5 and G7s tcpdump running to capture UDP 5060/SIP signaling to .pcap files All calls are ultimately B2BUA client -> asterisk -> PSTN Media stays on Asterisk at all times AGI script has exit handler that connects and updates an external database upon BYE from either side. I know that if exit

Doug, Look at the list. It seems you and Nitesh Divecha may be having the same problem. Maybe you guys can confirm that you have the same issue and figure out what is in common, such as Asterisk version or whatever. Thanks, Steve Doug Reid wrote: > Hi Steve > > I have tried a constant ping and get no problem on that. I assume that the > registration would use UPD and ping would

Hello, I tried to use two ?ConnectTo? entries in my config. If both servers are up, anything is working as expected. But if one of the two servers is offline or not reachable I will not get a connection at all. Not even to the reachable server. I would like to have it fault tolerant, is this possible? Thanks, best regards, -- Florian Lagg - Florian Lagg - IT-Komplettl?sungen

Hi everybody I've a very big network problem with some server running CentOS with KVM and some linux-like VMs on the top of it. The vm's network is bridged with a physical dedicate NIC (an Intel PRO/1000) with 2.4.14-NAPI driver (but the problem persists with various versions of the driver) and the CentOS version is 6.4 (same problem with a 5.7 sever) with all the last updates.

Hi, I have some network problems with my DomUs (etch) on a debian etch running xen 3.0.3. The domain0 is a DL360 G5 with tg3 network card If i download something from outside my dom0 box to a domU, i get this network rate: ~865kbits ... and it must be ~ 10Mbits, i think. Doing some tests with iperf i get this: [ 4] local outside_server port 5001 connected with _domU_ port 54889 [ 4]

Howdy folks, this email is a follow-on to a 3-month-old thread about kernel page faults from the bce driver[0]. 0: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-March/072713.html Sorry to revive such an old thread, but a couple of bits of new information has come to light here that may be useful for others. The header splitting suggestion that Marius Strobl made[1] did fix the kernel

Hi, After changing cables,switches,ports, I came to the conclusion that bce is reporting input errors that are not there, or creating them. I checked this with 3 different boxes, all Dell-2950/Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2), and one of them, while running Solaris, reported 0 errors after a week, and freebsd after a few minutes its count was > 100. The errors appear under

Recently under amd64 and 9.1-STABLE I am seeing issues with the bce driver. Message is "Warning: bootcode thinks driver is absent". After this message, the box appears to be wedged. After rebooting, it got the same message during fsck. So we installed 9.2 pre-release using a snapshot iso from 7/13/13. Shortly after boot we got the same message. We are now in the process of

Hi, tuning my network fixing nic's speed and duplex (both on server and switch) i got this error with bce driver: # ifconfig bce0 bce0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=1bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4> ether 00:15:c5:fe:11:01 inet 192.168.1.13 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast

I'm experiencing some odd issues with Virtualbox running on 9-STABLE. where my network periodically disappears ? sometimes, it comes back again after a few minutes, other times I have to reboot the server ? This last time, the error on the screen states: bce1: bce_pulse(): Warning: boot code thinks driver is absent! (bc_state = 0x00004006) I had 20 regular 'jail' VPSs running on it

I missed that snmp-ups set pollfreq to 30 by default. I'd hope that it would set deadtime to an appropriate value as well than, no? Is there a way to query what the settings are or what the defaults are? I'm going to set POLLFREQ=30 and DEADTIME = 90 and see if that has any effect. I'll check for the logs. And if that doesn't get my anywhere I'll look at trying to simulate